Difference between revisions of "2008 IMO Problems/Problem 3"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
(still editing...) | (still editing...) | ||
− | The main idea is to take a gaussian prime <math>a+bi</math> and multiply it by a "twice | + | The main idea is to take a gaussian prime <math>a+bi</math> and multiply it by a "twice as small" <math>c+di</math> to get <math>n+i</math>. The rest is just making up the little details. |
For each sufficiently large prime <math>p</math> of the form <math>4k+1</math>, we shall find a corresponding <math>n</math> satisfying the required condition with the prime number in question being <math>p</math>. Since there exist infinitely many such primes and, for each of them, <math>n \ge \sqrt{p-1}</math>, we will have found infinitely many distinct <math>n</math> satisfying the problem. | For each sufficiently large prime <math>p</math> of the form <math>4k+1</math>, we shall find a corresponding <math>n</math> satisfying the required condition with the prime number in question being <math>p</math>. Since there exist infinitely many such primes and, for each of them, <math>n \ge \sqrt{p-1}</math>, we will have found infinitely many distinct <math>n</math> satisfying the problem. | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
− | If <math>c=\pm\frac{a}{2}</math>, then from (1), we get <math>a\2</math> and hence <math>a=2</math>. That means that <math>d=-\frac{b-1}{2}</math> and <math>n=\frac{b(b-1)}{2}-2</math>. Therefore, <math>b^2-b=2n+4>2n</math> and so <math>\left(b-\frac{1}{2}\right)^2>2n</math>, from where <math>b > \sqrt{2n}+\frac{1}{2}</math>. Finally, <math>p=b^2+2^2 > 2n+\sqrt{2n}</math> and the case <math>c=\pm\frac{a}{2}</math> is cleared. | + | If <math>c=\pm\frac{a}{2}</math>, then from (1), we get <math>a\\2</math> and hence <math>a=2</math>. That means that <math>d=-\frac{b-1}{2}</math> and <math>n=\frac{b(b-1)}{2}-2</math>. Therefore, <math>b^2-b=2n+4>2n</math> and so <math>\left(b-\frac{1}{2}\right)^2>2n</math>, from where <math>b > \sqrt{2n}+\frac{1}{2}</math>. Finally, <math>p=b^2+2^2 > 2n+\sqrt{2n}</math> and the case <math>c=\pm\frac{a}{2}</math> is cleared. |
We can safely assume now that | We can safely assume now that | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<cmath>|d| \le \frac{b-1}{2}.</cmath> | <cmath>|d| \le \frac{b-1}{2}.</cmath> | ||
<cmath>n^2+1 = (a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2) > p \left( \frac{(a-1)^2}{4}+\frac{(b-1)^2}{4} \right).</cmath> | <cmath>n^2+1 = (a^2+b^2)(c^2+d^2) > p \left( \frac{(a-1)^2}{4}+\frac{(b-1)^2}{4} \right).</cmath> | ||
+ | Before we proceed, we would like to show that <math>a+b-1 > \sqrt{p}</math>. Observe that the function <math>x+\sqrt{p-x^2}</math> reaches its minima on <math>x\in(0,\sqrt{p})</math> on the edges, so <math>a+b</math> given <math>a^2+b^2=p</math> is minimized for <math>a = 2</math>. |
Revision as of 22:32, 3 September 2008
(still editing...)
The main idea is to take a gaussian prime and multiply it by a "twice as small" to get . The rest is just making up the little details.
For each sufficiently large prime of the form , we shall find a corresponding satisfying the required condition with the prime number in question being . Since there exist infinitely many such primes and, for each of them, , we will have found infinitely many distinct satisfying the problem.
Take a prime of the form and consider its "sum-of-two squares" representation , which we know to exist for all such primes. As , assume without loss of generality that . If , then is our guy, and as long as (and hence ) is large enough. Let's see what happens when .
Since and are (obviously) co-prime, there must exist integers and such that In fact, if and are such numbers, then and work as well for any integer , so we can assume that .
Define and let's see what happens. Notice that .
If , then from (1), we get and hence . That means that and . Therefore, and so , from where . Finally, and the case is cleared.
We can safely assume now that As , we have and so so Before we proceed, we would like to show that . Observe that the function reaches its minima on on the edges, so given is minimized for .