Difference between revisions of "Homogeneous set"
(started article) |
(added some more) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If <math>G</math> operates on a set <math>S</math>, then each of the [[orbit]]s of <math>S</math> is homogenous under the induced operation of <math>G</math>. | If <math>G</math> operates on a set <math>S</math>, then each of the [[orbit]]s of <math>S</math> is homogenous under the induced operation of <math>G</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Structure of a group acting on its own cosets == | ||
Let <math>G</math> be a group, <math>H</math> a subgroup of <math>G</math>, and <math>N</math> the [[normalizer]] of <math>H</math>. Then <math>G</math> operates on the left on <math>G/H</math>, the set of left [[coset]]s of <math>G</math> modulo <math>H</math>; evidently, <math>G/H</math> is a homogenous <math>G</math>-set. Furthermore, <math>N</math> operates on <math>G/H</math> from the right, by the operation <math>n: gH \mapsto gHn = gnH</math>. The operation of <math>H</math> is trivial, so <math>N/H</math> operates likewise on <math>G/H</math> from the right. Let <math>\phi : (N/H)^0 \to \mathfrak{S}_{G/H}</math> be the [[homomorphism]] of the opposite group of <math>N/H</math> into the group of permutations on <math>G/H</math> represented by this operation. | Let <math>G</math> be a group, <math>H</math> a subgroup of <math>G</math>, and <math>N</math> the [[normalizer]] of <math>H</math>. Then <math>G</math> operates on the left on <math>G/H</math>, the set of left [[coset]]s of <math>G</math> modulo <math>H</math>; evidently, <math>G/H</math> is a homogenous <math>G</math>-set. Furthermore, <math>N</math> operates on <math>G/H</math> from the right, by the operation <math>n: gH \mapsto gHn = gnH</math>. The operation of <math>H</math> is trivial, so <math>N/H</math> operates likewise on <math>G/H</math> from the right. Let <math>\phi : (N/H)^0 \to \mathfrak{S}_{G/H}</math> be the [[homomorphism]] of the opposite group of <math>N/H</math> into the group of permutations on <math>G/H</math> represented by this operation. | ||
− | '''Proposition.''' The homomorphism <math>\phi</math> induces an isomorphism from <math>(N/H)^0</math> to the group of <math>G</math>-[[automorphism]]s on <math>G/H</math>. | + | '''Proposition 1.''' The homomorphism <math>\phi</math> induces an isomorphism from <math>(N/H)^0</math> to the group of <math>G</math>-[[automorphism]]s on <math>G/H</math>. |
''Proof.'' First, we prove that the image of <math>\phi</math> is a subset of the set of automorphisms on <math>G/H</math>. Evidently, each element of <math>N/H</math> is associated with a [[surjective]] [[endomorphism]]; also if | ''Proof.'' First, we prove that the image of <math>\phi</math> is a subset of the set of automorphisms on <math>G/H</math>. Evidently, each element of <math>N/H</math> is associated with a [[surjective]] [[endomorphism]]; also if | ||
Line 12: | Line 14: | ||
Next, we show that each automorphism <math>f</math> of <math>G/H</math> has an inverse image under <math>\phi</math>. Evidently, the [[stabilizer]] of <math>f(H)</math> is the same as the stabilizer of <math>H</math>, which is <math>H</math> itself. Suppose that <math>x</math> is an element of <math>G</math> such that <math>f(H) = xH</math>. If <math>k</math> is an element of the stabilizer of <math>xH</math>, then <math>x^{-1}kxH \subseteq H</math>, whence <math>x^{-1}kxH \subseteq H</math>, or <math>k \in xHx^{-1}</math>. Since every element of <math>xHx^{-1}</math> stabilizes <math>xH</math>, it follows that <math>xHx^{-1}</math> is the stabilizer of <math>xH = f(H)</math>. Therefore <math>xHx^{-1} = H</math>, so <math>x\in N</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | Next, we show that each automorphism <math>f</math> of <math>G/H</math> has an inverse image under <math>\phi</math>. Evidently, the [[stabilizer]] of <math>f(H)</math> is the same as the stabilizer of <math>H</math>, which is <math>H</math> itself. Suppose that <math>x</math> is an element of <math>G</math> such that <math>f(H) = xH</math>. If <math>k</math> is an element of the stabilizer of <math>xH</math>, then <math>x^{-1}kxH \subseteq H</math>, whence <math>x^{-1}kxH \subseteq H</math>, or <math>k \in xHx^{-1}</math>. Since every element of <math>xHx^{-1}</math> stabilizes <math>xH</math>, it follows that <math>xHx^{-1}</math> is the stabilizer of <math>xH = f(H)</math>. Therefore <math>xHx^{-1} = H</math>, so <math>x\in N</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>\phi : G \to \mathfrak{S}_{G/H}</math> the homomorphism corresponding to the action of <math>G</math> on <math>G/H</math>. An element <math>\alpha</math> of <math>G</math> is in the [[kernel]] of <math>\phi</math> if and only if it stabilizes every left coset modulo <math>H</math>; since the stabilizers of these cosets are the [[conjugate (group theory) | conjugates]] of <math>H</math> (proven in the article on [[stabilizer]]s), it follows that <math>\text{Ker}(\phi)</math> is the intersection of the conjugates of <math>H</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If <math>N</math> is a [[normal subgroup]] of <math>G</math> that is contained in <math>H</math>, then for all <math>\alpha \in G</math>, then <math>N = \alpha N \alpha^{-1} \subseteq \alpha H \alpha^{-1}</math>. Therefore | ||
+ | <cmath> N \subseteq \bigcap_{\alpha \in G} \alpha H \alpha^{-1} = \text{Ker}(\phi). </cmath> | ||
+ | Since <math>\text{Ker}(\phi)</math> is evidently a normal subgroup of <math>G</math>, it is thus the ''largest'' normal subgroup of <math>G</math> that <math>H</math> contains. | ||
== See also == | == See also == |
Revision as of 23:08, 21 May 2008
Let be a group acting on a set . If has only one orbit, then the operation of on is said to be transitive, and the -set is called homogeneous, or that is a homogeneous set under .
If operates on a set , then each of the orbits of is homogenous under the induced operation of .
Structure of a group acting on its own cosets
Let be a group, a subgroup of , and the normalizer of . Then operates on the left on , the set of left cosets of modulo ; evidently, is a homogenous -set. Furthermore, operates on from the right, by the operation . The operation of is trivial, so operates likewise on from the right. Let be the homomorphism of the opposite group of into the group of permutations on represented by this operation.
Proposition 1. The homomorphism induces an isomorphism from to the group of -automorphisms on .
Proof. First, we prove that the image of is a subset of the set of automorphisms on . Evidently, each element of is associated with a surjective endomorphism; also if it follows that , whence ; for , this means . Therefore each element of is associated with a unique automorphism of the -set .
Next, we show that each automorphism of has an inverse image under . Evidently, the stabilizer of is the same as the stabilizer of , which is itself. Suppose that is an element of such that . If is an element of the stabilizer of , then , whence , or . Since every element of stabilizes , it follows that is the stabilizer of . Therefore , so .
Let the homomorphism corresponding to the action of on . An element of is in the kernel of if and only if it stabilizes every left coset modulo ; since the stabilizers of these cosets are the conjugates of (proven in the article on stabilizers), it follows that is the intersection of the conjugates of .
If is a normal subgroup of that is contained in , then for all , then . Therefore Since is evidently a normal subgroup of , it is thus the largest normal subgroup of that contains.