Difference between revisions of "Limit"
I like pie (talk | contribs) m (→See also) |
(ugh, started to clean) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | The notion of '''limit''' is | + | The notion of '''limit''' is an important idea in [[topology]] that applies to [[calculus]], [[analysis]], and other fields of mathematics. It took several centuries to articulate this idea and to make it rigorous. |
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
− | |||
− | Let <math>A\ | + | Let <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> be [[metric space]]s, let <math>A'</math> be a [[subspace]] of <math>A</math>, and, let <math>f</math> be a function from <math>A'</math> to <math>B</math>. Let <math>c</math> be a [[limit point]] of <math>A'</math>. (This means that in the metric space <math>A</math>, there are elements of <math>A'</math> arbitrarily close to <math>c</math>.) Let <math>L</math> be an element of <math>B</math>. We say |
+ | <cmath> \lim_{x\to c} f(x) = L, </cmath> | ||
+ | (that is, the limit of <math>f(x)</math> as <math>x</math> goes to <math>c</math> equals <math>L</math>) if for every positive real <math>\epsilon</math> there exists a positive real <math>\delta</math> for which | ||
+ | <cmath> 0 < d_A(x,c) < \delta </cmath> | ||
+ | implies | ||
+ | <cmath> d_B(f(x),L) < \epsilon </cmath> | ||
+ | for all <math>x \in A'</math>. Here <math>d_A</math> and <math>d_B</math> are the [[distance function]]s of <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>, respectively. | ||
− | + | In analysis and calculus, usually <math>A</math> and <math>B</math> are both either the set of [[real number | real]]s <math>\mathbb{R}</math> or [[complex number]]s <math>\mathbb{C}</math>. In this case, the distance functions <math>d_A(a,b)</math> and <math>d_B(a,b)</math> are both simply <math>|a-b|</math>. We then obtain the following definition commonly found in calculus textbooks: | |
− | Let <math>f: | + | :Let <math>f</math> be a function whose [[domain]] is a sub-interval of the real numbers and whose [[codomain]] is the set of reals. For a real number <math>L</math>, |
+ | <cmath> \lim_{x\to c} f(x) =L </cmath> | ||
+ | :if for every <math>\espilon >0</math> there exists a <math>\delta>0</math> such that | ||
+ | <cmath> 0 < |x-c| < \delta \quad \text{implies} \quad |f(x) - L| < \epsilon . </cmath> | ||
− | + | However, most theorems on real limits apply to limits in general, with identical proofs. | |
− | + | == Uniqueness == | |
− | <math>\ | + | The notation <math>\lim_{x\to c}f(x) = L</math> would only be justifiable if <math>L</math> were unique. Fortunately, this is the case. |
− | <math> | + | Indeed, suppose that <math>L'</math> is also <math>\lim_{x\to c}f(x)</math>, and that <math>L \neq L'</math>. Since <math>d_B(L,L') >0</math>, we can pick a positive real <math>\epsilon < d_B(L,L')/2</math>. But for any <math>y \in L</math>, |
+ | <cmath> d_B(L,y) + d_B(L',y) \ge d_B(L,L'), </cmath> | ||
+ | so no <math>y</math> can simultaneously satisfy the conditions | ||
+ | <cmath> \begin{align*} | ||
+ | d_B(L,y) &< \epsilon < \frac{d_B(L,L')}{2} \\ | ||
+ | d_B(L',y) &< \epsilon < \frac{d_B(L,L')}{2} , | ||
+ | \end{align*} </cmath> | ||
+ | a contradiction. Therefore limits are unique, as we wanted. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Existence of Limits== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Limits do not always exist. For example <math>\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}\frac{1}{x}</math> does not exist, since, in fact, there exists no <math>\epsilon</math> for which there exists <math>\delta</math> satisfying the definition's conditions, since <math>\left|\frac{1}{x}\right|</math> grows arbitrarily large as <math>x</math> approaches 0. However, it is possible for <math> \lim_{x\rightarrow c} f(x)</math> not to exist even when <math>f</math> is defined at <math>c</math>. For example, consider the Dirichlet function, <math>D(x)</math>, defined to be 0 when <math>x</math> is irrational, and 1 when <math>x</math> is rational. Here, <math>\lim_{x\rightarrow c}D(x)</math> does not exist for any value of <math>c</math>. Alternatively, limits can exist where a function is not defined, as for the function <math>f(x)</math> defined to be 1, but only for nonzero reals. Here, <math>\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}f(x)=1</math>, since for <math>x</math> arbitrarily close to 0, <math>f(x)=1</math>. | ||
==Intuitive Meaning== | ==Intuitive Meaning== | ||
− | + | ||
+ | Many people new to calculus have difficulty understanding the limit's formal definition. We can instead offer the following informal explanation: a limit is the value to which the function grows close. For example, | ||
+ | <cmath> \lim_{x\to 2}x^2=4, </cmath> | ||
+ | because whenever <math>x</math> is close to 2, the function <math>f(x)=x^2</math> grows close to 4. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In this case, the limit of the function is equal to the value of the function. That is, <math>\lim_{x\rightarrow c} f(x) = f(c)</math>. This is because the function we chose was [[continuous]] at <math>c</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, not all functions have this property. For example, consider the function <math>f(x)</math> over the reals defined as follows: | ||
+ | <cmath> f(x) = \begin{cases} | ||
+ | 0 & \text{if } x\neq 0 , \\ | ||
+ | 1 & \text{if } x=0 . | ||
+ | \end{cases} </cmath> | ||
+ | Although the value of the function <math>f</math> at 0 is 1, the limit <math>\lim_{x\rightarrow 0}f(x)</math> is, in fact, zero. Intuitively, this is because no matter how close we get to zero, as long as we never actually reach zero, <math>f(x)</math> will always be close to (in fact equal to) zero. Note that if our definition required only that <math>|x-c|<\delta</math>, the limit of this function would not exist. | ||
==Left and Right Hand Limits== | ==Left and Right Hand Limits== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In this section, we consider limits of functions whose domain and range are both subsets of the set of reals. | ||
+ | |||
Left and right hand limits are the limits taken as a point is approached from the left and from the right, respectively. The left hand limit is denoted as <math>\lim_{x\to c^{-}} f(x)</math>, and the right hand limit is denoted as <math>\lim_{x\to c^{+}} f(x)</math>. | Left and right hand limits are the limits taken as a point is approached from the left and from the right, respectively. The left hand limit is denoted as <math>\lim_{x\to c^{-}} f(x)</math>, and the right hand limit is denoted as <math>\lim_{x\to c^{+}} f(x)</math>. | ||
If the left hand and right hand limits at a certain point differ, than the limit does not exist at that point. For example, if we consider the step function (the greatest integer function) <math>f(x) = \lfloor x \rfloor</math>, we have <math>\lim_{x\to 0^{+}} \lfloor x \rfloor = 0</math>, while <math>\lim_{x\to 0^{-}} \lfloor x \rfloor = -1</math>. | If the left hand and right hand limits at a certain point differ, than the limit does not exist at that point. For example, if we consider the step function (the greatest integer function) <math>f(x) = \lfloor x \rfloor</math>, we have <math>\lim_{x\to 0^{+}} \lfloor x \rfloor = 0</math>, while <math>\lim_{x\to 0^{-}} \lfloor x \rfloor = -1</math>. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
A limit exists if the left and right hand side limits exist, and are equal. | A limit exists if the left and right hand side limits exist, and are equal. | ||
==Sequential Criterion== | ==Sequential Criterion== | ||
− | |||
− | + | Let <math>A\subset\mathbb{R}</math>, Let <math>c</math> be a [[cluster point]] of <math>A</math>, Let <math>f:A\rightarrow\mathbb{R}</math> and let Let <math>L\in\mathbb{R}</math> | |
− | + | Then <math>\lim_{x\rightarrow c}f(x)=L</math> if for every [[sequence]] <math>\left\langle x_n \right\rangle</math> that converges to <math>c</math>, the sequence <math>\left\langle f(x_n) \right\rangle</math> converges to <math>L</math>. | |
− | + | ==Other Properties== | |
− | + | Let <math>f</math> and <math>g</math> be real functions. Then: | |
− | Let <math>f</math> and <math>g</math> be real functions. Then: | ||
*<math>\lim(f+g)(x)=\lim f(x)+\lim g(x)</math> | *<math>\lim(f+g)(x)=\lim f(x)+\lim g(x)</math> | ||
− | |||
*<math>\lim(f\cdot g)(x)=\lim f(x)\cdot\lim g(x)</math> | *<math>\lim(f\cdot g)(x)=\lim f(x)\cdot\lim g(x)</math> | ||
*<math>\lim\left(\frac{f}{g}\right)(x)=\frac{\lim f(x)}{\lim g(x)}</math> given that <math>\lim g(x)\ne 0</math>. | *<math>\lim\left(\frac{f}{g}\right)(x)=\frac{\lim f(x)}{\lim g(x)}</math> given that <math>\lim g(x)\ne 0</math>. | ||
− | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Line 55: | Line 82: | ||
*[[Neighbourhoods]] | *[[Neighbourhoods]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Topology]] | ||
+ | [[Category:Analysis]] | ||
[[Category:Calculus]] | [[Category:Calculus]] | ||
[[Category:Definition]] | [[Category:Definition]] |
Revision as of 16:24, 7 May 2008
The notion of limit is an important idea in topology that applies to calculus, analysis, and other fields of mathematics. It took several centuries to articulate this idea and to make it rigorous.
Contents
Definition
Let and be metric spaces, let be a subspace of , and, let be a function from to . Let be a limit point of . (This means that in the metric space , there are elements of arbitrarily close to .) Let be an element of . We say (that is, the limit of as goes to equals ) if for every positive real there exists a positive real for which implies for all . Here and are the distance functions of and , respectively.
In analysis and calculus, usually and are both either the set of reals or complex numbers . In this case, the distance functions and are both simply . We then obtain the following definition commonly found in calculus textbooks:
- Let be a function whose domain is a sub-interval of the real numbers and whose codomain is the set of reals. For a real number ,
- if for every $\espilon >0$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg) there exists a such that
However, most theorems on real limits apply to limits in general, with identical proofs.
Uniqueness
The notation would only be justifiable if were unique. Fortunately, this is the case.
Indeed, suppose that is also , and that . Since , we can pick a positive real . But for any , so no can simultaneously satisfy the conditions a contradiction. Therefore limits are unique, as we wanted.
Existence of Limits
Limits do not always exist. For example does not exist, since, in fact, there exists no for which there exists satisfying the definition's conditions, since grows arbitrarily large as approaches 0. However, it is possible for not to exist even when is defined at . For example, consider the Dirichlet function, , defined to be 0 when is irrational, and 1 when is rational. Here, does not exist for any value of . Alternatively, limits can exist where a function is not defined, as for the function defined to be 1, but only for nonzero reals. Here, , since for arbitrarily close to 0, .
Intuitive Meaning
Many people new to calculus have difficulty understanding the limit's formal definition. We can instead offer the following informal explanation: a limit is the value to which the function grows close. For example, because whenever is close to 2, the function grows close to 4.
In this case, the limit of the function is equal to the value of the function. That is, . This is because the function we chose was continuous at .
However, not all functions have this property. For example, consider the function over the reals defined as follows: Although the value of the function at 0 is 1, the limit is, in fact, zero. Intuitively, this is because no matter how close we get to zero, as long as we never actually reach zero, will always be close to (in fact equal to) zero. Note that if our definition required only that , the limit of this function would not exist.
Left and Right Hand Limits
In this section, we consider limits of functions whose domain and range are both subsets of the set of reals.
Left and right hand limits are the limits taken as a point is approached from the left and from the right, respectively. The left hand limit is denoted as , and the right hand limit is denoted as .
If the left hand and right hand limits at a certain point differ, than the limit does not exist at that point. For example, if we consider the step function (the greatest integer function) , we have , while .
A limit exists if the left and right hand side limits exist, and are equal.
Sequential Criterion
Let , Let be a cluster point of , Let and let Let
Then if for every sequence that converges to , the sequence converges to .
Other Properties
Let and be real functions. Then:
- given that .