Difference between revisions of "Talk:Combinatorics"
IntrepidMath (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
-Intrepid | -Intrepid | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Good question. What should it be so that it's most useful? I think writing a book is clearly too much. Writing basic explanations with links to specific topics (where a few example problems could be posted) seems reasonable. Then again, this is all going to evolve, so use your best judgment and change it when you feel you have better ideas.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 22:59, 17 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:59, 17 June 2006
How detailed do we want to get? Should this be a taster, a treatise, etc?
Just Curious.
-Intrepid
Good question. What should it be so that it's most useful? I think writing a book is clearly too much. Writing basic explanations with links to specific topics (where a few example problems could be posted) seems reasonable. Then again, this is all going to evolve, so use your best judgment and change it when you feel you have better ideas.--MCrawford 22:59, 17 June 2006 (EDT)
