Difference between revisions of "User talk:1=2"
(→Concerning the deletion of Table of contents) |
(→Concerning the deletion of Table of contents) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:I'm under the impression that [[User:joml88|joml88]] created that redirect, and better out-of-namespace redirect than dead-end redirect .. <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|Azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 18:33, 8 January 2008 (EST) | :I'm under the impression that [[User:joml88|joml88]] created that redirect, and better out-of-namespace redirect than dead-end redirect .. <font style="font-family:Georgia,sans-serif">[[User:Azjps|Azjps]] ([[User talk:Azjps|<font color="green">talk</font>]])</font> 18:33, 8 January 2008 (EST) | ||
::Actually, joml88 created it, it was deleted, then 1=2 recreated it. Also, I disagree with the second point. What if we were to create an article concerning the table of contents of a math article, or the LaTeX needed for it? It seems best to me to not let mainspace articles go redir to other spaces. [[User:Temperal|Temperal]]<span style="color:red"><small><sup>[[User Talk:Temperal|xy]]</sup></small></span> 22:34, 15 January 2008 (EST) | ::Actually, joml88 created it, it was deleted, then 1=2 recreated it. Also, I disagree with the second point. What if we were to create an article concerning the table of contents of a math article, or the LaTeX needed for it? It seems best to me to not let mainspace articles go redir to other spaces. [[User:Temperal|Temperal]]<span style="color:red"><small><sup>[[User Talk:Temperal|xy]]</sup></small></span> 22:34, 15 January 2008 (EST) | ||
− | :::Sorry if I did anything wrong, but articles were linking to a "Table of contents", and I saw something of a "Table of Contents", so I linked the articles to | + | :::Sorry if I did anything wrong, but articles were linking to a "Table of contents", and I saw something of a "Table of Contents", so I linked the articles to [[AoPSWiki:Table of Contents]]. [[User:1=2|1=2]] 13:42, 21 January 2008 (EST) |
== AMC 8 == | == AMC 8 == |
Revision as of 13:43, 21 January 2008
Hehe
You can sign your self and stuff by putting four tilde things like this: ~~~~ Or, you just click the button with a signature on it and it automatically puts it in. Nice work on the AMCs you've been doing. Temperalxy 18:13, 24 October 2007 (EDT)
Issues
Gazunteit!
Mock MC
Would you try out this Mock Mathcounts I wrote? It's mostly chapter and state level, I'm afraid, making it too easy for you, but you could find any mistakes I made...
It's actually only half of a MC, since Siddhant was supposed to write the other half, and he *cough* forgot. Thanks.
Temperalxy 14:56, 11 December 2007 (EST)
Do you want me to get answers and see if we agree, or find bad wordings, or what? -- 1=2 19:40, 11 December 2007 (EST)
Concerning the deletion of Table of contents
Please don't create out-of-namespace redirects. Thanks. Temperalxy 18:20, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- I'm under the impression that joml88 created that redirect, and better out-of-namespace redirect than dead-end redirect .. Azjps (talk) 18:33, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Actually, joml88 created it, it was deleted, then 1=2 recreated it. Also, I disagree with the second point. What if we were to create an article concerning the table of contents of a math article, or the LaTeX needed for it? It seems best to me to not let mainspace articles go redir to other spaces. Temperalxy 22:34, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- Sorry if I did anything wrong, but articles were linking to a "Table of contents", and I saw something of a "Table of Contents", so I linked the articles to AoPSWiki:Table of Contents. 1=2 13:42, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- Actually, joml88 created it, it was deleted, then 1=2 recreated it. Also, I disagree with the second point. What if we were to create an article concerning the table of contents of a math article, or the LaTeX needed for it? It seems best to me to not let mainspace articles go redir to other spaces. Temperalxy 22:34, 15 January 2008 (EST)
AMC 8
If there are solutions to the AMC 10 and 12, then why can't we make solutions for the AMC 8? --1=2 10:00, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- We can, but who's willing to make a post many years of trivial questions? They would get bored to death. If you want to, go for it. Temperalxy 22:34, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- Looking at the '07, I saw your point of view. But then, say to MysticTerminator, AMC 10 and 12 are trivial problems as well. :) --1=2 11:34, 16 January 2008 (EST)