Difference between revisions of "Talk:MATHCOUNTS"
(aotd) |
(→Usernames: new section) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
I used MathCounts instead of MATHCOUNTS because the wiki has some issues with capitalization in internal links. Wikipedia authors choose MathCounts, so I felt it was likely that their choice was made with experience and consideration. We'll see how it turns out.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 13:41, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | I used MathCounts instead of MATHCOUNTS because the wiki has some issues with capitalization in internal links. Wikipedia authors choose MathCounts, so I felt it was likely that their choice was made with experience and consideration. We'll see how it turns out.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 13:41, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Usernames == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Don't you think, for the safety of the users at AOPS, that the past winners' username's shouldn't be mentioned? | ||
Revision as of 17:10, 29 May 2011
| AoPSWiki Article of the Day | ||
|
| ||
Wait I thought it was MATHCOUNTS
It is. Do you know how to change the name of articles? MathCounts looks better written however... Let ze admins decide!
-IntrepidMath
I think MATHCOUNTS looks better. Whatev
MathCounts is more prevalent on the forums.--IntrepidMath 13:08, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
I used MathCounts instead of MATHCOUNTS because the wiki has some issues with capitalization in internal links. Wikipedia authors choose MathCounts, so I felt it was likely that their choice was made with experience and consideration. We'll see how it turns out.--MCrawford 13:41, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
Usernames
Don't you think, for the safety of the users at AOPS, that the past winners' username's shouldn't be mentioned?
