Difference between revisions of "1992 OIM Problems/Problem 1"
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
Hence, <math>a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + \cdots + a_{1992}=6984</math> | Hence, <math>a_1 + a_2 + a_3 + \cdots + a_{1992}=6984</math> | ||
− | * Note. I actually competed at this event in Venezuela when I was in High School representing Puerto Rico. Although I did get the correct answer, I was only given 8 out of 10 points because I didn't prove that the pattern repeats every 20 numbers. I simply listed the calculations for the first 23 to 26 <math>a_n</math>'s and realized that the pattern repeated. Without proof I proceeded to calculate 20 times 99 plus the summation from <math>a_1</math> through <math> | + | * Note. I actually competed at this event in Venezuela when I was in High School representing Puerto Rico. Although I did get the correct answer, I was only given 8 out of 10 points because I didn't prove that the pattern repeats every 20 numbers. I simply listed the calculations for the first 23 to 26 <math>a_n</math>'s and realized that the pattern repeated. Without proof I proceeded to calculate 20 times 99 plus the summation from <math>a_1</math> through <math>a_{12}</math> and despite getting the correct numerical answer, I was not awarded the full points for not sufficient proof. At the competition showing that the pattern repeats every 20 by induction was not sufficient proof. I submitted such proof on this page. |
~Tomas Diaz. orders@tomasdiaz.com | ~Tomas Diaz. orders@tomasdiaz.com |
Revision as of 10:22, 15 December 2023
Problem
For each positive integer , let be the last digit of the number. . Calculate .
~translated into English by Tomas Diaz. ~orders@tomasdiaz.com
Solution
Let and be integers with , and
Since , then
Let
Since
then,
Now we calculate through :
Using the table above we calculate: ,
Hence,
Using the table above we calculate:
Therefore,
Hence,
- Note. I actually competed at this event in Venezuela when I was in High School representing Puerto Rico. Although I did get the correct answer, I was only given 8 out of 10 points because I didn't prove that the pattern repeats every 20 numbers. I simply listed the calculations for the first 23 to 26 's and realized that the pattern repeated. Without proof I proceeded to calculate 20 times 99 plus the summation from through and despite getting the correct numerical answer, I was not awarded the full points for not sufficient proof. At the competition showing that the pattern repeats every 20 by induction was not sufficient proof. I submitted such proof on this page.
~Tomas Diaz. orders@tomasdiaz.com
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.