Difference between revisions of "2005 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
(→Solution) |
m (→Solution) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
First of all, <math>|a_n|<n</math> | First of all, <math>|a_n|<n</math> | ||
Otherwise, <math>a_n = 0</math> mod <math>a_{a_n}</math> | Otherwise, <math>a_n = 0</math> mod <math>a_{a_n}</math> | ||
+ | |||
Claim: <math>a_{k+1}</math> is either the smallest positive number not in <math>{a_1, a_2, ..., a_k}</math> or the largest negative number not in this set. | Claim: <math>a_{k+1}</math> is either the smallest positive number not in <math>{a_1, a_2, ..., a_k}</math> or the largest negative number not in this set. | ||
− | Proof by induction: the induction hypothesis implies that <math>a_1, a_2, ..., a_k</math> are consecutive. Let m and M be the smallest and largest numbers in this consecutive set, respectively. It is clear that <math>a_{k+1}=m-1=M+1</math> mod <math>k+1</math>. But since <math>|a_n|<n</math>, <math>a_{k+1}=m-1</math> or <math>M+1</math> | + | **Proof by induction**: the induction hypothesis implies that <math>a_1, a_2, ..., a_k</math> are consecutive. Let m and M be the smallest and largest numbers in this consecutive set, respectively. It is clear that <math>a_{k+1}=m-1=M+1</math> mod <math>k+1</math>. But since <math>|a_n|<n</math>, <math>a_{k+1}=m-1</math> or <math>M+1</math> |
+ | |||
This proves that if <math>{a_n}</math> contains an infinite number of positive and negative numbers, it must contain each integer exactly once. | This proves that if <math>{a_n}</math> contains an infinite number of positive and negative numbers, it must contain each integer exactly once. |
Revision as of 00:11, 19 November 2023
Problem
Let be a sequence of integers with infinitely many positive and negative terms. Suppose that for every positive integer the numbers leave different remainders upon division by . Prove that every integer occurs exactly once in the sequence.
Solution
satisfies the conditions if and only if does. Therefore we can assume that
First of all, Otherwise, mod
Claim: is either the smallest positive number not in or the largest negative number not in this set.
- Proof by induction**: the induction hypothesis implies that are consecutive. Let m and M be the smallest and largest numbers in this consecutive set, respectively. It is clear that mod . But since , or
This proves that if contains an infinite number of positive and negative numbers, it must contain each integer exactly once.
See Also
2005 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |