Difference between revisions of "2001 IMO Shortlist Problems/A3"
Maths1234rc (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
Maths1234rc (talk | contribs) (→Solution 1) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
<cmath> (\lvert \sin t \rvert + \sqrt{n} \cos t)/k \le (1 + n)^{1/2}(\sin^2 t + \cos^2 t)^{1/2}/k = \sqrt{n+1}/k, </cmath> | <cmath> (\lvert \sin t \rvert + \sqrt{n} \cos t)/k \le (1 + n)^{1/2}(\sin^2 t + \cos^2 t)^{1/2}/k = \sqrt{n+1}/k, </cmath> | ||
with equality only when <math>(\lvert \sin t \rvert, \cos t) = (1/\sqrt{n^2+1}, n/\sqrt{n^2+1}</math>. Since <math>\left\lvert n/\sqrt{n^2+1} \right\rvert < 1</math>, our equality cases never coincide, so we have the desired strict inequality for <math>n+1</math>. Thus our inequality is true by induction. The problem statement therefore follows from setting <math>k=1</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | with equality only when <math>(\lvert \sin t \rvert, \cos t) = (1/\sqrt{n^2+1}, n/\sqrt{n^2+1}</math>. Since <math>\left\lvert n/\sqrt{n^2+1} \right\rvert < 1</math>, our equality cases never coincide, so we have the desired strict inequality for <math>n+1</math>. Thus our inequality is true by induction. The problem statement therefore follows from setting <math>k=1</math>. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
− | == Solution | + | == Solution 2 == |
+ | By the [[Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality]] | ||
<math>a_1+a_2+.....+a_k \leq \sqrt{n}.\sqrt{a_1^2+a_2^2+................+a_k^2}</math> | <math>a_1+a_2+.....+a_k \leq \sqrt{n}.\sqrt{a_1^2+a_2^2+................+a_k^2}</math> | ||
For all real numbers. <math>a_1,a_2,....</math> | For all real numbers. <math>a_1,a_2,....</math> |
Revision as of 05:32, 23 October 2023
Contents
Problem
Let be arbitrary real numbers. Prove the inequality
Solution
We prove the following general inequality, for arbitrary positive real : with equality only when .
We proceed by induction on . For , we have trivial equality. Now, suppose our inequality holds for . Then by inductive hypothesis, If we let , then we have with equality only if . By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality, with equality only when . Since , our equality cases never coincide, so we have the desired strict inequality for . Thus our inequality is true by induction. The problem statement therefore follows from setting .
Solution 2
By the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality For all real numbers. Hence it is only required to prove where
for ,
For k=1
Summing these inequalities, the right-hand side yields
Hence Proved by Maths1234RC.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.