Difference between revisions of "1992 AIME Problems/Problem 5"
m (→Solution) |
Mathkiddie (talk | contribs) (→Solution 2) |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
If <math>abc</math> is not divisible by <math>3</math> or <math>37</math>, then this is in lowest terms. Let us consider the other multiples: <math>333</math> multiples of <math>3</math>, <math>27</math> of <math>37</math>, and <math>9</math> of both <math>3</math> and <math>37</math>, so <math>999-333-27+9 = 648</math>, which is the amount that are neither. The <math>12</math> numbers that are multiples of <math>81</math> reduce to multiples of <math>3</math>. We have to count these since it will reduce to a multiple of <math>3</math> which we have removed from <math>999</math>, but, this cannot be removed since the numerator cannot cancel the <math>3</math>.There aren't any numbers which are multiples of <math>37^2</math>, so we can't get numerators which are multiples of <math>37</math>. Therefore <math>648 + 12 = \boxed{660}</math>. | If <math>abc</math> is not divisible by <math>3</math> or <math>37</math>, then this is in lowest terms. Let us consider the other multiples: <math>333</math> multiples of <math>3</math>, <math>27</math> of <math>37</math>, and <math>9</math> of both <math>3</math> and <math>37</math>, so <math>999-333-27+9 = 648</math>, which is the amount that are neither. The <math>12</math> numbers that are multiples of <math>81</math> reduce to multiples of <math>3</math>. We have to count these since it will reduce to a multiple of <math>3</math> which we have removed from <math>999</math>, but, this cannot be removed since the numerator cannot cancel the <math>3</math>.There aren't any numbers which are multiples of <math>37^2</math>, so we can't get numerators which are multiples of <math>37</math>. Therefore <math>648 + 12 = \boxed{660}</math>. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{{AIME box|year=1992|num-b=4|num-a=6}} | {{AIME box|year=1992|num-b=4|num-a=6}} |
Latest revision as of 19:45, 4 March 2024
Problem
Let be the set of all rational numbers , , that have a repeating decimal expansion in the form , where the digits , , and are not necessarily distinct. To write the elements of as fractions in lowest terms, how many different numerators are required?
Solution
We consider the method in which repeating decimals are normally converted to fractions with an example:
Thus, let
If is not divisible by or , then this is in lowest terms. Let us consider the other multiples: multiples of , of , and of both and , so , which is the amount that are neither. The numbers that are multiples of reduce to multiples of . We have to count these since it will reduce to a multiple of which we have removed from , but, this cannot be removed since the numerator cannot cancel the .There aren't any numbers which are multiples of , so we can't get numerators which are multiples of . Therefore .
1992 AIME (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 4 |
Followed by Problem 6 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.