Difference between revisions of "User talk:Etmetalakret"
Etmetalakret (talk | contribs) |
Etmetalakret (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
AoPS Wiki users, ignore this page. I'm using my User Talk to explain proof writing to friends. | AoPS Wiki users, ignore this page. I'm using my User Talk to explain proof writing to friends. | ||
− | == Proof 1: Inequalities == | + | == Proof 1: The Pythagorean Theorem == |
+ | Prove the Pythagorean Theorem for a right triangle <math>\triangle ABC</math> such that <math>\angle BCA = 90^{\circ}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Explanation === | ||
+ | I showed this proof in AoPS one time. We let <math>\overline{BP}</math> be an altitude of <math>\triangle ABC</math> and hunt for triangle similarity. See the following diagram: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Examine the triangles <math>\triangle CBP</math> and <math>\triangle ABC</math>. They both share <math>\angle B</math> and a right angle, so AA Similarity guarantees that <math>\triangle CBP \sim \triangle ABC</math>. Similarly, <math>\triangle ACP \sim \triangle ABC</math>. We thus get the following ratios: <cmath>\frac{PB}{a} = \frac{a}{c} \textrm{ and } \frac{AP}{b} = \frac{b}{c}.</cmath> We can solve for <math>PB</math> and <math>AP</math> as follows: <cmath>PB = \frac{a^2}{c} \textrm{ and } AP = \frac{b^2}{c}.</cmath> But why is this useful? It's because <math>AP + PB = c</math>. Using this fact, we have that <cmath>c = AP + PB = \frac{a^2}{c} + \frac{b^2}{c}.</cmath> Multiplying this equation by <math>c</math> yields the desired <math>a^2 + b^2 = c^2</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | It's important to acknowledge that the above is not a well-written proof. Your goal in a proof is NOT to show how you found it; it's simply to ''illustrate why it's true''. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Bad Proof === | ||
+ | Note that <math>\angle PBC = \angle CBA = \angle B</math> and <math>\angle BPC = BCA = 90</math>. We thus have by AA Similarity that <math>\triangle CBP \sim \triangle ABC</math>. Similarly, <math>\triangle ACP \sim \triangle ABC</math>. Therefore, <math>\frac{PB}{a} = \frac{a}{c} \textrm{ and } \frac{AP}{b} = \frac{b}{c}.</math> We can solve for <math>PB</math> and <math>AP</math> as follows: <math>PB = \frac{a^2}{c} \textrm{ and } AP = \frac{b^2}{c}.</math> Then the following sequence of equations holds: <math>c = AP + PB = \frac{a^2}{c} + \frac{b^2}{c}.</math> Multiplying this equation by <math>c</math> yields the desired <math>a^2 + b^2 = c^2</math>. <math>\square</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Why is this proof bad?''' | ||
+ | * '''No Diagram''': You ALWAYS need a diagram in geometry proofs to help the grader remain oriented in dense notation. | ||
+ | * '''Terms have not been defined''': What are <math>a</math>, <math>b</math>, and <math>c</math>? What about <math>\angle B</math>? You can still use these these instead of writing out <math>BC</math>, <math>CA</math>, <math>AB</math>, and <math>\angle ABC</math>, but you need to define them. | ||
+ | * '''Not Enough Space''': GIVE THESE WALLS OF EQUATIONS THEIR OWN LINES! | ||
+ | * '''Degrees Not Specified''': The proof references <math>90^{\circ}</math>, not whatever <math>90</math> means. | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Good Proof === | ||
+ | Let <math>P</math> be the point on <math>\overline{AB}</math> such that <math>\angle BPC = 90^{\circ}</math>, as shown in the following diagram: | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that <math>\angle PBC = \angle CBA</math> and <math>\angle BPC = BCA = 90^{\circ}</math>. We thus have by AA Similarity that <math>\triangle CBP \sim \triangle ABC</math>. Similarly, <math>\triangle ACP \sim \triangle ABC</math>. Therefore, <cmath>\frac{PB}{BC} = \frac{CB}{BA} \textrm{ and } \frac{AP}{AC} = \frac{AC}{AB}.</cmath> We can solve for <math>PB</math> and <math>AP</math> as follows: <cmath>PB = \frac{BC^2}{AB} \textrm{ and } AP = \frac{CA^2}{AB}.</cmath> Then the following sequence of equations holds: <cmath>AB = AP + PB = \frac{BC^2}{AB} + \frac{CA^2}{AB} = \frac{BC^2 + CA^2}{AB}.</cmath> Multiplying this equation by <math>AB</math> yields the desired <math>BC^2 + CA^2 = AB^2</math>. <math>\square</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Proof 2: Inequalities == | ||
The well-known '''Trivial Inequality''' states that if <math>x</math> is a real number, then <math>x^2 \geq 0</math>. Prove that if <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> are nonnegative real numbers, then <cmath>\frac{x + y}{2} \geq \sqrt{xy}.</cmath> (Sidenote: this is a very different kind of inequality problem than you're used to. In school, we find ''when'' inequalities are true; here, we're showing it's ''always'' true.) | The well-known '''Trivial Inequality''' states that if <math>x</math> is a real number, then <math>x^2 \geq 0</math>. Prove that if <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> are nonnegative real numbers, then <cmath>\frac{x + y}{2} \geq \sqrt{xy}.</cmath> (Sidenote: this is a very different kind of inequality problem than you're used to. In school, we find ''when'' inequalities are true; here, we're showing it's ''always'' true.) | ||
Line 22: | Line 46: | ||
* '''Written Backwards''': We must always write proofs like: true result <math>\implies</math> desired result. However, the proof is written backwards so that the desired result <math>\implies</math> true result. The Trivial Inequality should be at the ''start'', not the end. | * '''Written Backwards''': We must always write proofs like: true result <math>\implies</math> desired result. However, the proof is written backwards so that the desired result <math>\implies</math> true result. The Trivial Inequality should be at the ''start'', not the end. | ||
* '''Informal Word Choice''': Please don't use the phrase "algebra autopilot" in a proof, and don't write sentences with no verbs (see the "Multiply the inequality by <math>2</math> and square it"). Also, don't use "I," although ''"we" is totally acceptable''. | * '''Informal Word Choice''': Please don't use the phrase "algebra autopilot" in a proof, and don't write sentences with no verbs (see the "Multiply the inequality by <math>2</math> and square it"). Also, don't use "I," although ''"we" is totally acceptable''. | ||
− | * '''Not Enough Space''': A little more space would make this proof easier to read. Important equations should | + | * '''Not Enough Space''': A little more space would make this proof easier to read. Important equations should have their own line. |
=== Good Proof === | === Good Proof === | ||
− | By the Trivial Inequality, we have that <cmath>(x - y)^2 \geq 0.</cmath> Factoring this inequality returns <math>x^2 - 2xy + y^2 \geq 0</math>. We add <math>4xy</math> to both sides and factor to get <math>(x + y)^2 \geq 4xy</math>. Note that because <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> are nonnegative, both sides are nonnegative; we may therefore take the square root of the inequality, which yields <cmath>x + y \geq 2 \sqrt{xy}.</cmath> Finally, dividing both sides by <math>2</math> gives | + | By the Trivial Inequality, we have that <cmath>(x - y)^2 \geq 0.</cmath> Factoring this inequality returns <math>x^2 - 2xy + y^2 \geq 0</math>. We add <math>4xy</math> to both sides and factor to get <math>(x + y)^2 \geq 4xy</math>. Note that because <math>x</math> and <math>y</math> are nonnegative, both sides are nonnegative; we may therefore take the square root of the inequality, which yields <cmath>x + y \geq 2 \sqrt{xy}.</cmath> Finally, dividing both sides by <math>2</math> gives <math>(x + y) / 2 \geq \sqrt{xy}</math>, which completes the proof. <math>\square</math> |
Revision as of 19:47, 1 April 2023
AoPS Wiki users, ignore this page. I'm using my User Talk to explain proof writing to friends.
Contents
Proof 1: The Pythagorean Theorem
Prove the Pythagorean Theorem for a right triangle such that .
Explanation
I showed this proof in AoPS one time. We let be an altitude of and hunt for triangle similarity. See the following diagram:
Examine the triangles and . They both share and a right angle, so AA Similarity guarantees that . Similarly, . We thus get the following ratios: We can solve for and as follows: But why is this useful? It's because . Using this fact, we have that Multiplying this equation by yields the desired .
It's important to acknowledge that the above is not a well-written proof. Your goal in a proof is NOT to show how you found it; it's simply to illustrate why it's true.
Bad Proof
Note that and . We thus have by AA Similarity that . Similarly, . Therefore, We can solve for and as follows: Then the following sequence of equations holds: Multiplying this equation by yields the desired .
Why is this proof bad?
- No Diagram: You ALWAYS need a diagram in geometry proofs to help the grader remain oriented in dense notation.
- Terms have not been defined: What are , , and ? What about ? You can still use these these instead of writing out , , , and , but you need to define them.
- Not Enough Space: GIVE THESE WALLS OF EQUATIONS THEIR OWN LINES!
- Degrees Not Specified: The proof references , not whatever means.
Good Proof
Let be the point on such that , as shown in the following diagram:
Note that and . We thus have by AA Similarity that . Similarly, . Therefore, We can solve for and as follows: Then the following sequence of equations holds: Multiplying this equation by yields the desired .
Proof 2: Inequalities
The well-known Trivial Inequality states that if is a real number, then . Prove that if and are nonnegative real numbers, then (Sidenote: this is a very different kind of inequality problem than you're used to. In school, we find when inequalities are true; here, we're showing it's always true.)
Explanation
I found the proof by working backwards; I started with the desired result, and connected it to something true. Here is the wall of equations on my page (sadly I can't get them aligned): Because the left-hand side of this equation is a perfect square, this is actually the Trivial Inequality in disguise. The desired inequality is therefore implied by a true result. Really understand and grasp how I derived this before you read the following proofs:
Bad Proof
I start out with Multiply the inequality by and square it, . Letting our algebra go on autopilot, and , so . This is true by Trivial Inequality, which completes the proof.
Why is this proof bad?
- Written Backwards: We must always write proofs like: true result desired result. However, the proof is written backwards so that the desired result true result. The Trivial Inequality should be at the start, not the end.
- Informal Word Choice: Please don't use the phrase "algebra autopilot" in a proof, and don't write sentences with no verbs (see the "Multiply the inequality by and square it"). Also, don't use "I," although "we" is totally acceptable.
- Not Enough Space: A little more space would make this proof easier to read. Important equations should have their own line.
Good Proof
By the Trivial Inequality, we have that Factoring this inequality returns . We add to both sides and factor to get . Note that because and are nonnegative, both sides are nonnegative; we may therefore take the square root of the inequality, which yields Finally, dividing both sides by gives , which completes the proof.