Difference between revisions of "2023 AIME I Problems/Problem 7"
Mathboy100 (talk | contribs) |
m (→Solution 2) |
||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
<math>n</math> can either be <math>0</math> or <math>1</math> mod <math>2</math>. | <math>n</math> can either be <math>0</math> or <math>1</math> mod <math>2</math>. | ||
− | Case 1: <math>n | + | Case 1: <math>n \equiv 0 \pmod{2}</math> |
− | Then, <math>n | + | Then, <math>n \equiv 2 \pmod{4}</math>, which implies <math>n \equiv 1 \pmod{3}</math>. By CRT, <math>n \equiv 4 \pmod{6}</math>, and therefore <math>n \equiv 3 \pmod{5}</math>. Using CRT again, we obtain <math>n \equiv 58 \pmod{60}</math>, which gives <math>16</math> values for <math>n</math>. |
− | Case 2: <math>n | + | Case 2: <math>n \equiv 1 \pmod{2}</math> |
− | <math>n</math> is then <math>3 \pmod{4}</math>. If <math>n | + | <math>n</math> is then <math>3 \pmod{4}</math>. If <math>n \equiv 0 \pmod{3}</math>, then by CRT, <math>n \equiv 3 \pmod{6}</math>, a contradiction. Thus, <math>n \equiv 2 \pmod{3}</math>, which by CRT implies <math>n \equiv 5 \pmod{6}</math>. <math>n</math> can either be <math>0 \pmod{5}</math>, which implies that <math>n \equiv 35 \pmod{60}</math>, <math>17</math> cases; or <math>4 \pmod{5}</math>, which implies that <math>n \equiv 59 \pmod{60}</math>, <math>16</math> cases. |
<math>16 + 16 + 17 = \boxed{49}</math>. | <math>16 + 16 + 17 = \boxed{49}</math>. | ||
~mathboy100 | ~mathboy100 |
Revision as of 16:12, 8 February 2023
Problem
Call a positive integer extra-distinct if the remainders when is divided by and are distinct. Find the number of extra-distinct positive integers less than .
Solution
.
We have . This violates the condition that is extra-distinct. Therefore, this case has no solution.
.
We have . This violates the condition that is extra-distinct. Therefore, this case has no solution.
.
We have . This violates the condition that is extra-distinct. Therefore, this case has no solution.
.
The condition implies , .
Because is extra-distinct, for is a permutation of . Thus, .
However, conflicts . Therefore, this case has no solution.
.
The condition implies and .
Because is extra-distinct, for is a permutation of .
Because , we must have . Hence, .
Hence, . Hence, .
We have . Therefore, the number extra-distinct in this case is 16.
.
The condition implies and .
Because is extra-distinct, and are two distinct numbers in . Because and is odd, we have . Hence, or 4.
, , .
We have .
We have . Therefore, the number extra-distinct in this subcase is 17.
, , .
.
We have . Therefore, the number extra-distinct in this subcase is 16.
Putting all cases together, the total number of extra-distinct is .
~Steven Chen (Professor Chen Education Palace, www.professorchenedu.com)
Solution 2
can either be or mod .
Case 1:
Then, , which implies . By CRT, , and therefore . Using CRT again, we obtain , which gives values for .
Case 2:
is then . If , then by CRT, , a contradiction. Thus, , which by CRT implies . can either be , which implies that , cases; or , which implies that , cases.
.
~mathboy100