Art of Problem Solving
AoPS Online
Math texts, online classes, and more
for students in grades 5-12.
Visit AoPS Online ‚
Books for Grades 5-12 Online Courses
Beast Academy
Engaging math books and online learning
for students ages 6-13.
Visit Beast Academy ‚
Books for Ages 6-13 Beast Academy Online
AoPS Academy
Small live classes for advanced math
and language arts learners in grades 2-12.
Visit AoPS Academy ‚
Find a Physical Campus Visit the Virtual Campus

Difference between revisions of "2000 AIME I Problems/Problem 4"

(→‎Solution 2 Length-chasing (Angle-chasing but for side lengths))
(→‎Solution 1)
Line 26: Line 26:
  
 
We can guess that <math>a_1 = 2</math>. (If we started with <math>a_1</math> odd, the resulting sides would not be integers and we would need to scale up by a factor of <math>2</math> to make them integers; if we started with <math>a_1 > 2</math> even, the resulting dimensions would not be relatively prime and we would need to scale down.) Then solving gives <math>a_9 = 36</math>, <math>a_6=25</math>, <math>a_8 = 33</math>, which gives us <math>l=61,w=69</math>.  These numbers are relatively prime, as desired. The perimeter is <math>2(61)+2(69)=\boxed{260}</math>.
 
We can guess that <math>a_1 = 2</math>. (If we started with <math>a_1</math> odd, the resulting sides would not be integers and we would need to scale up by a factor of <math>2</math> to make them integers; if we started with <math>a_1 > 2</math> even, the resulting dimensions would not be relatively prime and we would need to scale down.) Then solving gives <math>a_9 = 36</math>, <math>a_6=25</math>, <math>a_8 = 33</math>, which gives us <math>l=61,w=69</math>.  These numbers are relatively prime, as desired. The perimeter is <math>2(61)+2(69)=\boxed{260}</math>.
 +
 +
== Solution 1.2 (more detail) ==
 +
We can just list the equations:
 +
\begin{align*}
 +
s_3 &= s_1 + s_2 \\
 +
s_4 &= s_3 + s_1 \\
 +
s_5 &= s_4 + s_3 \\
 +
s_6 &= s_5 + s_4 \\
 +
s_7 &= s_5 + s_3 + s_2 \\
 +
s_8 &= s_7 + s_2 \\
 +
s_9 &= s_8 + s_2 - s_1 \\
 +
s_9 + s_8 &= s_7 + s_6 + s_5 \end{align*}We can then write each <math>s_i</math> in terms of <math>s_1</math> and <math>s_2</math>:
 +
\begin{align*}
 +
s_4 &= 2s_1 + s_2 \\
 +
s_5 &= 3s_1 +2s_2 \\
 +
s_6 &= 5s_1 + 3s_2 \\
 +
s_7 &= 4s_1 + 4s_2 \\
 +
s_8 &= 4s_1 + 5s_2 \\
 +
s_9 &= 3s_1 + 6s_2 \\
 +
\end{align*}Since <math>s_9 + s_8 = s_7 + s_6 + s_5 \implies (3s_1 + 6s_2) + (4s_1 + 5s_2) = (4s_1 + 4s_2) + (5s_1 + 3s_2) + (3s_1 + 2s_2),</math> <cmath>2s_2 = 5s_1 \implies \frac{2}{5}s_2 = s_1.</cmath>Since the side lengths of the rectangle are relatively prime, <math>s_1 = 2</math> and <math>s_2 = 5.</math> Therefore, <math>2(2s_9 + s_6 + s_8) = 30s_1 + 40s_2 = \boxed{260}.</math>
 +
~peelybonehead
  
 
==Solution 2 Length-chasing (Angle-chasing but for side lengths) ==
 
==Solution 2 Length-chasing (Angle-chasing but for side lengths) ==

Revision as of 01:45, 20 May 2023

Problem

The diagram shows a rectangle that has been dissected into nine non-overlapping squares. Given that the width and the height of the rectangle are relatively prime positive integers, find the perimeter of the rectangle.

[asy]draw((0,0)--(69,0)--(69,61)--(0,61)--(0,0));draw((36,0)--(36,36)--(0,36)); draw((36,33)--(69,33));draw((41,33)--(41,61));draw((25,36)--(25,61)); draw((34,36)--(34,45)--(25,45)); draw((36,36)--(36,38)--(34,38)); draw((36,38)--(41,38)); draw((34,45)--(41,45));[/asy]

Solution 1

Call the squares' side lengths from smallest to largest $a_1,\ldots,a_9$, and let $l,w$ represent the dimensions of the rectangle.

The picture shows that \begin{align*} a_1+a_2 &= a_3\\ a_1 + a_3 &= a_4\\ a_3 + a_4 &= a_5\\ a_4 + a_5 &= a_6\\ a_2 + a_3 + a_5 &= a_7\\ a_2 + a_7 &= a_8\\ a_1 + a_4 + a_6 &= a_9\\ a_6 + a_9 &= a_7 + a_8.\end{align*}

Expressing all terms 3 to 9 in terms of $a_1$ and $a_2$ and substituting their expanded forms into the previous equation will give the expression $5a_1 = 2a_2$.

We can guess that $a_1 = 2$. (If we started with $a_1$ odd, the resulting sides would not be integers and we would need to scale up by a factor of $2$ to make them integers; if we started with $a_1 > 2$ even, the resulting dimensions would not be relatively prime and we would need to scale down.) Then solving gives $a_9 = 36$, $a_6=25$, $a_8 = 33$, which gives us $l=61,w=69$. These numbers are relatively prime, as desired. The perimeter is $2(61)+2(69)=\boxed{260}$.

Solution 1.2 (more detail)

We can just list the equations: \begin{align*} s_3 &= s_1 + s_2 \\ s_4 &= s_3 + s_1 \\ s_5 &= s_4 + s_3 \\ s_6 &= s_5 + s_4 \\ s_7 &= s_5 + s_3 + s_2 \\ s_8 &= s_7 + s_2 \\ s_9 &= s_8 + s_2 - s_1 \\ s_9 + s_8 &= s_7 + s_6 + s_5 \end{align*}We can then write each $s_i$ in terms of $s_1$ and $s_2$: \begin{align*} s_4 &= 2s_1 + s_2 \\ s_5 &= 3s_1 +2s_2 \\ s_6 &= 5s_1 + 3s_2 \\ s_7 &= 4s_1 + 4s_2 \\ s_8 &= 4s_1 + 5s_2 \\ s_9 &= 3s_1 + 6s_2 \\ \end{align*}Since $s_9 + s_8 = s_7 + s_6 + s_5 \implies (3s_1 + 6s_2) + (4s_1 + 5s_2) = (4s_1 + 4s_2) + (5s_1 + 3s_2) + (3s_1 + 2s_2),$ \[2s_2 = 5s_1 \implies \frac{2}{5}s_2 = s_1.\]Since the side lengths of the rectangle are relatively prime, $s_1 = 2$ and $s_2 = 5.$ Therefore, $2(2s_9 + s_6 + s_8) = 30s_1 + 40s_2 = \boxed{260}.$ ~peelybonehead

Solution 2 Length-chasing (Angle-chasing but for side lengths)

We set the side length of the smallest square to 1, and set the side length of square $a_4$ in the previous question to a. We do some "side length chasing" and get $4a - 4 = 2a + 5$. Solving, we get $a = 4.5$ and the side lengths are $61$ and $69$. $2(61 + 69) = \boxed{260}$

See also

2000 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources)
Preceded by
Problem 3 		Followed by
Problem 5
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15
All AIME Problems and Solutions

The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions. AMC logo.png

Retrieved from "https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=2000_AIME_I_Problems/Problem_4&oldid=193290"