Difference between revisions of "1995 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
(→Solution 8 (fast Titu's Lemma)) |
m (→Solution 5) |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
<cmath> (x + y + y + z + x + z) (\frac{x^2}{y+z} + \frac{y^2}{z+x} + \frac{z^2}{x+y}) \ge (x + y + z)^2 </cmath> | <cmath> (x + y + y + z + x + z) (\frac{x^2}{y+z} + \frac{y^2}{z+x} + \frac{z^2}{x+y}) \ge (x + y + z)^2 </cmath> | ||
by Cauchy-Schwarz, and so dividing by <math>2(x + y + z)</math> gives | by Cauchy-Schwarz, and so dividing by <math>2(x + y + z)</math> gives | ||
− | <cmath> \begin{align*}\frac{x^2}{y+z} + \frac{y^2}{z+x} + \frac{z^2}{x+y} &\ge \frac{(x + y + z)}{2} \\ &\ge \frac{3}{2} \end{align*} | + | <cmath> \begin{align*}\frac{x^2}{y+z} + \frac{y^2}{z+x} + \frac{z^2}{x+y} &\ge \frac{(x + y + z)}{2} \\ &\ge \frac{3}{2} \end{align*}</cmath> |
as desired. | as desired. | ||
Revision as of 04:29, 1 June 2024
Contents
Problem
(Nazar Agakhanov, Russia) Let be positive real numbers such that . Prove that
Solution
Solution 1
We make the substitution , , . Then Since and are similarly sorted sequences, it follows from the Rearrangement Inequality that By the Power Mean Inequality, Symmetric application of this argument yields Finally, AM-GM gives us as desired.
Solution 2
We make the same substitution as in the first solution. We note that in general, It follows that and are similarly sorted sequences. Then by Chebyshev's Inequality, By AM-GM, , and by Nesbitt's Inequality, The desired conclusion follows.
Solution 3
Without clever substitutions: By Cauchy-Schwarz, Dividing by gives by AM-GM.
Solution 3b
Without clever notation: By Cauchy-Schwarz,
Dividing by and noting that by AM-GM gives as desired.
Solution 4
After the setting and as so concluding
By Titu Lemma, Now by AM-GM we know that and which concludes to
Therefore we get
Hence our claim is proved ~~ Aritra12
Solution 5
Proceed as in Solution 1, to arrive at the equivalent inequality But we know that by AM-GM. Furthermore, by Cauchy-Schwarz, and so dividing by gives as desired.
Solution 6
Without clever substitutions, and only AM-GM!
Note that . The cyclic sum becomes . Note that by AM-GM, the cyclic sum is greater than or equal to . We now see that we have the three so we must be on the right path. We now only need to show that . Notice that by AM-GM, , , and . Thus, we see that , concluding that
Solution 7 from Brilliant Wiki (Muirheads) =
https://brilliant.org/wiki/muirhead-inequality/
Solution 8 (fast Titu's Lemma no substitutions)
Rewrite as .
Now applying Titu's lemma yields .
Now applying the AM-GM inequality on . The result now follows.
Note: , because . (Why? Because , and hence ).
~th1nq3r
Scroll all the way down
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.