Difference between revisions of "Vieta's formulas"

m (Proof)
m (Proof)
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
== Proof ==
 
== Proof ==
Let all terms be defined as above. By the [[factor theorem]], <math>P(x) = a_n (x-r_1)(x-r_2) \cdots (x-r_n)</math>. When we expand this polynomial, each term is generated by <math>n</math> choices of whether to include <math>x</math> or <math>-r_{n-i}</math> from any factor <math>(x-r_{n-i})</math>. We will then prove Vieta’s formulas by expanding this polynomial and comparing the resulting coefficients with the original polynomial’s coefficients.  
+
Let all terms be defined as above. By the [[factor theorem]], <math>P(x) = a_n (x-r_1)(x-r_2) \cdots (x-r_n)</math>. When we expand this polynomial, each term is generated by the <math>n</math> choices of whether to include <math>x</math> or <math>-r_{n-i}</math> from any factor <math>(x-r_{n-i})</math>. We will then prove Vieta’s formulas by expanding this polynomial and comparing the resulting coefficients with the original polynomial’s coefficients.  
  
 
Consider all the expanded terms of <math>P(x)</math> with degree <math>n-j</math>; they are formed by choosing <math>j</math> of the negative roots, making the remaining <math>n-j</math> choices <math>x</math>, and finally multiplied by the constant <math>a_n</math>. We note that when we multiply <math>j</math> of the negative roots, we get <math>(-1)^j\cdot s_j</math>.
 
Consider all the expanded terms of <math>P(x)</math> with degree <math>n-j</math>; they are formed by choosing <math>j</math> of the negative roots, making the remaining <math>n-j</math> choices <math>x</math>, and finally multiplied by the constant <math>a_n</math>. We note that when we multiply <math>j</math> of the negative roots, we get <math>(-1)^j\cdot s_j</math>.

Revision as of 19:52, 6 November 2021

In algebra, Vieta's formulas are a set of results that relate the coefficients of a polynomial to its roots. In particular, it states that the elementary symmetric polynomials of its roots can be easily expressed as a ratio between two of the polynomial's coefficients.

It is among the most ubiquitous results to circumvent finding a polynomial's roots in competition math and sees widespread usage in all mathematics contests.

Statement

Let $P(x) = a_n x^n + a_{n-1}x^{n-1} + \cdots + a_1 x + a_0$ be any polynomial with complex coefficients with roots $r_1, r_2, \ldots , r_n$, and let $s_j$ be the $j$th elementary symmetric polynomial of the roots.

Vieta’s formulas then state that \[s_1 = r_1 + r_2 + \cdots + r_n = - \frac{a_{n-1}}{a_n}\] \[s_2 = r_1r_2 + r_1r_3 + \cdots + r_{n-1}r_n = \frac{a_{n-2}}{a_n}\] \[\vdots\] \[s_n = r_1r_2r_3 \cdots r_n = (-1)^n \frac{a_0}{a_n}.\] This can be compactly written as $s_j = (-1)^j \frac{a_{n-j}}{a_n}$ for some $j$ such that $0<j \leq n$

Proof

Let all terms be defined as above. By the factor theorem, $P(x) = a_n (x-r_1)(x-r_2) \cdots (x-r_n)$. When we expand this polynomial, each term is generated by the $n$ choices of whether to include $x$ or $-r_{n-i}$ from any factor $(x-r_{n-i})$. We will then prove Vieta’s formulas by expanding this polynomial and comparing the resulting coefficients with the original polynomial’s coefficients.

Consider all the expanded terms of $P(x)$ with degree $n-j$; they are formed by choosing $j$ of the negative roots, making the remaining $n-j$ choices $x$, and finally multiplied by the constant $a_n$. We note that when we multiply $j$ of the negative roots, we get $(-1)^j\cdot s_j$.

So in mathematical terms, when we expand $P(x)$, the coefficient of $x_{n-j}$ is equal to $(-1)^j a_n s_j$.

However, we defined the coefficient of $x^{n-j}$ to be $a_{n-j}$.

Thus, $(-1)^j a_n s_j = a_{n-j}$, or $s_j = (-1)^j \dfrac{a_{n-j}}{a_n}$, which completes the proof. $\Box$

Problems

Here are some problems that test knowledge of Vieta's formulas.

Introductory

Intermediate

See also