Difference between revisions of "2021 AIME II Problems/Problem 9"
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) m |
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) (→Proof 1 (Euclidean Algorithm): Made the proof concise.) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Otherwise, let <math>a>b</math> without the loss of generality. Note that for all integers <math>p>q>0,</math> the Euclidean Algorithm states that <cmath>\gcd(p,q)=\gcd(p-q,q)=\cdots=\gcd(q,p\text{ mod }q).</cmath> We apply this result repeatedly to reduce the larger number: <cmath>\gcd\left(u^a-1,u^b-1\right)=\gcd\left(u^b-1,u^a-1-u^{a-b}\left(u^b-1\right)\right)=\gcd\left(u^b-1,u^{a-b}-1\right).</cmath> | Otherwise, let <math>a>b</math> without the loss of generality. Note that for all integers <math>p>q>0,</math> the Euclidean Algorithm states that <cmath>\gcd(p,q)=\gcd(p-q,q)=\cdots=\gcd(q,p\text{ mod }q).</cmath> We apply this result repeatedly to reduce the larger number: <cmath>\gcd\left(u^a-1,u^b-1\right)=\gcd\left(u^b-1,u^a-1-u^{a-b}\left(u^b-1\right)\right)=\gcd\left(u^b-1,u^{a-b}-1\right).</cmath> | ||
Continuing, we will get | Continuing, we will get | ||
− | < | + | <math></math>\begin{align*} |
\gcd\left(u^a-1,u^b-1\right)&=\cdots \\ | \gcd\left(u^a-1,u^b-1\right)&=\cdots \\ | ||
&=\gcd\left(u^b-1,u^{a-b}-1\right) \\ | &=\gcd\left(u^b-1,u^{a-b}-1\right) \\ | ||
&=\cdots \\ | &=\cdots \\ | ||
− | &=\gcd\left(u^ | + | &=\gcd\left(u^{\gcd(a,b)}-1,u^{\gcd(a,b)}-1\right) \\ |
− | &=u^ | + | &=u^{\gcd(a,b)}-1, |
− | \end{align*} | + | \end{align*} |
− | + | from which the proof is complete. | |
− | |||
− | |||
~MRENTHUSIASM | ~MRENTHUSIASM |
Revision as of 03:24, 1 April 2021
Contents
Problem
Find the number of ordered pairs such that and are positive integers in the set and the greatest common divisor of and is not .
Solution 1
We make use of the (olympiad number theory) lemma that .
Noting , we have (by difference of squares) It is now easy to calculate the answer (with casework on ) as .
~Lcz
Solution 2 (Generalized and Comprehensive)
Claim
If and are positive integers for which then
There are two proofs to this claim, as shown below.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Proof 1 (Euclidean Algorithm)
If then from which the claim is clearly true.
Otherwise, let without the loss of generality. Note that for all integers the Euclidean Algorithm states that We apply this result repeatedly to reduce the larger number: Continuing, we will get $$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)\begin{align*} \gcd\left(u^a-1,u^b-1\right)&=\cdots \\ &=\gcd\left(u^b-1,u^{a-b}-1\right) \\ &=\cdots \\ &=\gcd\left(u^{\gcd(a,b)}-1,u^{\gcd(a,b)}-1\right) \\ &=u^{\gcd(a,b)}-1, \end{align*} from which the proof is complete.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Proof 2
Solution in progress. A million thanks for not editing.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution
Solution in progress. A million thanks for not editing.
~MRENTHUSIASM
See Also
2021 AIME II (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 8 |
Followed by Problem 10 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.