Difference between revisions of "2020 AIME I Problems/Problem 12"
m (→Solution 1) |
m (→Solution 1) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
− | Now, setting <math>n</math> by <math> | + | Now, setting <math>n = 4c</math> (necessitated by <math>149^n \equiv 2^n \pmod 5</math> in order to set up LTE), we see <cmath>v_5(149^{4c}-2^{4c}) = v_5(149^{4c}-16^{c})</cmath> and since <math>149^{4} \equiv 1 \pmod{25}</math> and <math>16^1 \equiv 16 \pmod{25}</math> then <math>v_5(149^{4c}-2^{4c})=1+v_5(c)</math> meaning that we have that by LTE, <math>5^4 | c</math> and <math>4 \cdot 5^4</math> divides <math>n</math>. |
Since <math>3^2</math>, <math>7^5</math> and <math>4\cdot 5^4</math> all divide <math>n</math>, the smallest value of <math>n</math> working is their LCM, also <math>3^2 \cdot 7^5 \cdot 4 \cdot 5^4 = 2^2 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 5^4 \cdot 7^5</math>. Thus the number of divisors is <math>(2+1)(2+1)(4+1)(5+1) = \boxed{270}</math>. | Since <math>3^2</math>, <math>7^5</math> and <math>4\cdot 5^4</math> all divide <math>n</math>, the smallest value of <math>n</math> working is their LCM, also <math>3^2 \cdot 7^5 \cdot 4 \cdot 5^4 = 2^2 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 5^4 \cdot 7^5</math>. Thus the number of divisors is <math>(2+1)(2+1)(4+1)(5+1) = \boxed{270}</math>. |
Revision as of 20:22, 4 March 2021
Contents
Problem
Let be the least positive integer for which
is divisible by
Find the number of positive integer divisors of
Solution 1
Lifting the Exponent shows that so thus,
divides
. It also shows that
so thus,
divides
.
Now, setting (necessitated by
in order to set up LTE), we see
and since
and
then
meaning that we have that by LTE,
and
divides
.
Since ,
and
all divide
, the smallest value of
working is their LCM, also
. Thus the number of divisors is
.
~kevinmathz
clarified by another user
Lol you can get by just Euler Totient.
~LLL2019
Solution 2 (Simpler, just basic mods and Fermat's theorem)
Note that for all ,
is divisible by
by difference of
th powers. That is
, so now we can clearly see that the smallest
to make the expression divisible by
is just
. Similarly, we can reason that the smallest
to make the expression divisible by
is just
.
Finally, for , take
and
of each quantity (They happen to both be
and
respectively, so you only need to compute once). One knows from Fermat's theorem that the maximum possible minimum
for divisibility by
is
, and other values are factors of
. Testing all of them(just
,
,
using mods-not too bad),
is indeed the smallest value to make the expression divisible by
, and this clearly is NOT divisible by
.
Therefore, the smallest
to make this expression divisible by
is
.
Calculating the LCM of all these, one gets . Using the factor counting formula,
the answer is
=
.
~Solution by thanosaops
~formatted by MY-2
~also formatted by pandyhu2001
Solution 3 (Elementary and Thorough)
As usual, denote the highest power of prime
that divides
. For divisibility by
, notice that
as
, and upon checking mods,
is divisible by
but not
. In addition,
is divisible by
because
, and the rightmost factor equates to
. In fact,
is the least possible choice to ensure divisibility by
because if
, with
and
, we write
Then, the rightmost factor is equivalent to
, and
.
For divisibility by , we'll induct, claiming that
for whole numbers
. The base case is clear. Then,
By the induction hypothesis,
. Then, notice that
This tells us that
is divisible by
, but not
so that
, completing our induction. We can verify that
is the least choice of
to ensure divisibility by
by arguing similarly to the
case.
Finally, for , we take the powers of
and
in mod
and mod
. Writing out these mods, we have that
if and only if
, in which
. So here we claim that
and perform yet another induction. The base case is true:
, but
. Now then, assuming the induction statement to hold for some
,
Note that
equates to
in both mod
and mod
. We notice that
. Writing out the powers of
mod
, we have
. Also
when
is a multiple of
. Hence for
,
. Thus,
, completing our induction. Applying the same argument from the previous two cases,
is the least choice to ensure divisibility by
.
Our answer is the number of divisors of . It is
.
~hnkevin42
Solution 4 (Official MAA)
Analyze each prime power separately.
Start with the case of . By the Binomial Theorem,
Because
is divisible by
, all terms after the first two are divisible by
, and the exponent of
in the first term is less than that in the second term. Hence it is necessary and sufficient that
, that is,
.
For the
case, consider the same expansion as in the previous case. Because
is divisible by
, all terms after the first three are divisible by
, and the exponent of
in the first term is less than that in the second and third term. Hence it is necessary and sufficient that
, that is,
.
For the
case, working modulo
gives
, so it must be that
. Let
, and let
. Note that
is an integer not divisible by
. Expand by the Binomial Theorem again to get
All terms after the first four are divisible by
, and the exponent of
in the first term is less than that in the second, third, or fourth term. Hence it is necessary and sufficient that
. Thus
, and it follows that
.
Therefore the least
is
. The requested number of divisors is
.
The results of the above cases can be generalized using the following lemma.
Lifting the Exponent Lemma: Let be an odd prime, and let
and
be integers relatively prime to
such that
. Let
be a positive integer. Then the number of factors of
that divide
is equal to the number of factors of
that divide
plus the number of factors of
that divide
.
See Also
2020 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 11 |
Followed by Problem 13 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.