Difference between revisions of "2020 AMC 8 Problems/Problem 20"

m (Minor improvements)
Line 40: Line 40:
  
 
If Tree 4 now has a height of <math>11</math>, then Tree 5 would need to have height <math>22</math>, but in that case <math>S</math> would equal <math>88</math>, which is not <math>1</math> more than a multiple of <math>5</math>. So we instead take Tree 4 to have height <math>44</math>. Then the sum of the heights of the first 4 trees is <math>22+11+22+44 = 99</math>, so using a height of <math>22</math> for Tree 5 gives <math>S=121</math>, which is <math>1</math> more than a multiple of <math>5</math> (whereas <math>88</math> gives <math>S = 187</math>, which is not). Thus the average height of the trees is <math>\frac{121}{5} = \boxed{\textbf{(B) }24.2}</math> meters.
 
If Tree 4 now has a height of <math>11</math>, then Tree 5 would need to have height <math>22</math>, but in that case <math>S</math> would equal <math>88</math>, which is not <math>1</math> more than a multiple of <math>5</math>. So we instead take Tree 4 to have height <math>44</math>. Then the sum of the heights of the first 4 trees is <math>22+11+22+44 = 99</math>, so using a height of <math>22</math> for Tree 5 gives <math>S=121</math>, which is <math>1</math> more than a multiple of <math>5</math> (whereas <math>88</math> gives <math>S = 187</math>, which is not). Thus the average height of the trees is <math>\frac{121}{5} = \boxed{\textbf{(B) }24.2}</math> meters.
 +
 +
==Video Solution==
 +
https://youtu.be/8nVSeTx5rro
 +
 +
~savannahsolver
  
 
==See also==  
 
==See also==  
 
{{AMC8 box|year=2020|num-b=19|num-a=21}}
 
{{AMC8 box|year=2020|num-b=19|num-a=21}}
 
{{MAA Notice}}
 
{{MAA Notice}}

Revision as of 17:35, 23 November 2020

Problem

A scientist walking through a forest recorded as integers the heights of $5$ trees standing in a row. She observed that each tree was either twice as tall or half as tall as the one to its right. Unfortunately some of her data was lost when rain fell on her notebook. Her notes are shown below, with blanks indicating the missing numbers. Based on her observations, the scientist was able to reconstruct the lost data. What was the average height of the trees, in meters?

\[\begingroup \setlength{\tabcolsep}{10pt} \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline Tree 1 & \rule{0.4cm}{0.15mm} meters \\ Tree 2 & 11 meters \\ Tree 3 & \rule{0.5cm}{0.15mm} meters \\ Tree 4 & \rule{0.5cm}{0.15mm} meters \\ Tree 5 & \rule{0.5cm}{0.15mm} meters \\ \hline Average height & \rule{0.5cm}{0.15mm}\text{ .}2 meters \\ \hline \end{tabular} \endgroup\]

$\textbf{(A) }22.2 \qquad \textbf{(B) }24.2 \qquad \textbf{(C) }33.2 \qquad \textbf{(D) }35.2 \qquad \textbf{(E) }37.2$

Solution 1

We will show that $22$, $11$, $22$, $44$, and $22$ meters are the heights of the trees from left to right. We are given that all tree heights are integers, so since Tree 2 has height $11$ meters, we can deduce that Trees 1 and 3 both have a height of $22$ meters. There are now three possible cases for the heights of Trees 4 and 5 (in order for them to be integers), namely heights of $11$ and $22$, $44$ and $88$, or $44$ and $22$. Checking each of these, in the first case, the average is $17.6$ meters, which doesn't end in $.2$ as the problem requires. Therefore, we consider the other cases. With $44$ and $88$, the average is $37.4$ meters, which again does not end in $.2$, but with $44$ and $22$, the average is $24.2$ meters, which does. Consequently, the answer is $\boxed{\textbf{(B) }24.2}$.

Solution 2

As in Solution 1, we shall show that the heights of the trees are $22$, $11$, $22$, $44$, and $22$ meters. Let $S$ be the sum of the heights, so that the average height will be $\frac{S}{5}$ meters. We note that $0.2 = \frac{1}{5}$, so in order for $\frac{S}{5}$ to end in $.2$, $S$ must be one more than a multiple of $5$. Moreover, as all the heights are integers, the heights of Tree 1 and Tree 3 are both $22$ meters. At this point, our table looks as follows: \[\begingroup \setlength{\tabcolsep}{10pt} \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5} \begin{tabular}{|c|c|} \hline Tree 1 & 22 meters \\ Tree 2 & 11 meters \\ Tree 3 & 22 meters \\ Tree 4 & \rule{0.5cm}{0.15mm} meters \\ Tree 5 & \rule{0.5cm}{0.15mm} meters \\ \hline Average height & \rule{0.5cm}{0.15mm}\text{ .}2 meters \\ \hline \end{tabular} \endgroup\]

If Tree 4 now has a height of $11$, then Tree 5 would need to have height $22$, but in that case $S$ would equal $88$, which is not $1$ more than a multiple of $5$. So we instead take Tree 4 to have height $44$. Then the sum of the heights of the first 4 trees is $22+11+22+44 = 99$, so using a height of $22$ for Tree 5 gives $S=121$, which is $1$ more than a multiple of $5$ (whereas $88$ gives $S = 187$, which is not). Thus the average height of the trees is $\frac{121}{5} = \boxed{\textbf{(B) }24.2}$ meters.

Video Solution

https://youtu.be/8nVSeTx5rro

~savannahsolver

See also

2020 AMC 8 (ProblemsAnswer KeyResources)
Preceded by
Problem 19
Followed by
Problem 21
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
All AJHSME/AMC 8 Problems and Solutions

The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions. AMC logo.png