Difference between revisions of "Without loss of generality"
() |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* [[2007_AMC_10A_Problems/Problem_19 | 2007 AMC 10A Problem 19]] | * [[2007_AMC_10A_Problems/Problem_19 | 2007 AMC 10A Problem 19]] | ||
* [[2006_AMC_12A_Problems/Problem_20 | 2006 AMC 12A Problem 20]] | * [[2006_AMC_12A_Problems/Problem_20 | 2006 AMC 12A Problem 20]] | ||
| − | * [[2012_AMC_10A_Problems/Problem_23 | 2012 AMC | + | * [[2012_AMC_10A_Problems/Problem_23 | 2012 AMC 10A Problem 23]] |
[[Category:Definition]] | [[Category:Definition]] | ||
=== Advanced Level === | === Advanced Level === | ||
* [[2017_USAJMO_Problems/Problem_3 | 2017 USAJMO Problem 3]] | * [[2017_USAJMO_Problems/Problem_3 | 2017 USAJMO Problem 3]] | ||
Revision as of 12:40, 28 August 2020
Without loss of generality is a term used in proofs to indicate that an assumption is being made that does not introduce new restrictions to the problem. For example, in the proof of Schur's Inequality, one can assume that 
without loss of generality because the inequality is symmetric in 
, 
and 
. Without loss of generality is often abbreviated WLOG or WOLOG. Be sure not to write WLOG when you mean "with loss of generality"!
WLOG means that it is ok to assume a value for a variable, or other such unknown, in order to solve the problem. This is often done in problems concerning ratios, or any other value that remains constant regardless of what is assumed
