Difference between revisions of "2013 USAJMO Problems/Problem 1"
Alexlikemath (talk | contribs) |
Alexlikemath (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
==Solution 6== | ==Solution 6== | ||
+ | I claim there are no such a or b such that both expressions are cubes. | ||
− | Assume to the contrary <math>a^5b +3</math> and <math>ab^5 + 3</math> are cubes. Since cubes are congruent to any of <math>0, 1, -1 \pmod 9</math>, <math>ab^5,a^5b \equiv 5,6,7 \pmod 9</math>. But if <math>ab^5 \equiv 6 \pmod 9</math>, <math>3|a</math>, so <math>a^5b \equiv 0 \pmod 9</math>, contradiction. A similar argument can be made for <math>ab^5 \neq 6 \pmod 9</math>. Thus, we get that: | + | Assume to the contrary <math>a^5b +3</math> and <math>ab^5 + 3</math> are cubes. |
+ | |||
+ | Since cubes are congruent to any of <math>0, 1, -1 \pmod 9</math>, <math>ab^5,a^5b \equiv 5,6,7 \pmod 9</math>. But if <math>ab^5 \equiv 6 \pmod 9</math>, <math>3|a</math>, so <math>a^5b \equiv 0 \pmod 9</math>, contradiction. | ||
+ | |||
+ | A similar argument can be made for <math>ab^5 \neq 6 \pmod 9</math>. Thus, we get that: | ||
<cmath>ab^5,a^5b \equiv 5,7 \pmod 9</cmath> | <cmath>ab^5,a^5b \equiv 5,7 \pmod 9</cmath> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
A critical idea is that since cubes are congruent to <math>0, 1, -1 \pmod 9</math>, 6th powers are congruent to <math>0, 1 \pmod 9</math>. And, <math>ab^5 \cdot a^5b = a^6 b^6 = (ab)^6</math>, making the the product of <math>ab^5, a^5b</math> a perfect 6th power. | A critical idea is that since cubes are congruent to <math>0, 1, -1 \pmod 9</math>, 6th powers are congruent to <math>0, 1 \pmod 9</math>. And, <math>ab^5 \cdot a^5b = a^6 b^6 = (ab)^6</math>, making the the product of <math>ab^5, a^5b</math> a perfect 6th power. | ||
Line 48: | Line 51: | ||
But, we can substitiute our possible values of <math>ab^5, a^5b</math>. <math>5 \cdot 5 \equiv 7 \pmod 9</math>, <math>5 \cdot 7 \equiv 8 \pmod 9</math>, and <math>7 \cdot 7 \equiv 4 \pmod 9</math>. None of these are congruent to <math>0, 1 \pmod 9</math>, but perfect 6th powers have to be congruent to <math>0, 1 \pmod 9</math>. We have a contradiction. <math>\blacksquare</math> | But, we can substitiute our possible values of <math>ab^5, a^5b</math>. <math>5 \cdot 5 \equiv 7 \pmod 9</math>, <math>5 \cdot 7 \equiv 8 \pmod 9</math>, and <math>7 \cdot 7 \equiv 4 \pmod 9</math>. None of these are congruent to <math>0, 1 \pmod 9</math>, but perfect 6th powers have to be congruent to <math>0, 1 \pmod 9</math>. We have a contradiction. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | -AlexLikeMath | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} |
Revision as of 12:53, 15 June 2020
Problem
Are there integers and such that and are both perfect cubes of integers?
Solution
No, such integers do not exist. This shall be proven by contradiction, by showing that if is a perfect cube then cannot be.
Remark that perfect cubes are always congruent to , , or modulo . Therefore, if , then .
If , then note that . (This is because if then .) Therefore and , contradiction.
Otherwise, either or . Note that since is a perfect sixth power, and since neither nor contains a factor of , . If , then Similarly, if , then Therefore , contradiction.
Therefore no such integers exist.
Solution 2
We shall prove that such integers do not exist via contradiction. Suppose that and for integers x and y. Rearranging terms gives and . Solving for a and b (by first multiplying the equations together and taking the sixth root) gives a = and b = . Consider a prime p in the prime factorization of and . If it has power in and power in , then - is a multiple of 24 and - also is a multiple of 24.
Adding and subtracting the divisions gives that - divides 12. (actually, is a multiple of 4, as you can verify if . So the rest of the proof is invalid.) Because - also divides 12, divides 12 and thus divides 3. Repeating this trick for all primes in , we see that is a perfect cube, say . Then and , so that and . Clearly, this system of equations has no integer solutions for or , a contradiction, hence completing the proof.
Therefore no such integers exist.
Solution 3
Let and . Then, , , and Now take (recall that perfect cubes and perfect sixth powers ) on both sides. There are cases to consider on what values that and take. Checking these cases, we see that only or yield a valid residue (specifically, ). But this means that , so so contradiction.
Solution 4
If is a perfect cube, then can be one of , so can be one of , , or . If were divisible by , we'd have , which we've ruled out. So , which means , and therefore .
We've shown that can be one of , so can be one of . None of these are possibilities for a perfect cube, so if is a perfect cube, cannot be.
Solution 5
As in previous solutions, notice . Now multiplying gives , which is only , so after testing all cases we find that . Then since , and (Note that cannot be ). Thus we find that the inverse of is itself under modulo , a contradiction.
Solution 6
I claim there are no such a or b such that both expressions are cubes.
Assume to the contrary and are cubes.
Since cubes are congruent to any of , . But if , , so , contradiction.
A similar argument can be made for . Thus, we get that:
A critical idea is that since cubes are congruent to , 6th powers are congruent to . And, , making the the product of a perfect 6th power.
But, we can substitiute our possible values of . , , and . None of these are congruent to , but perfect 6th powers have to be congruent to . We have a contradiction.
-AlexLikeMath
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.