Difference between revisions of "2015 AMC 10B Problems/Problem 23"
(→Solution 4) |
Aops turtle (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 2) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
By Legendre's Formula and the information given, we have that <math>3\left(\left\lfloor{\frac{n}{5}}\right\rfloor+\left\lfloor{\frac{n}{25}}\right\rfloor\right)=\left\lfloor{\frac{2n}{5}}\right\rfloor+\left\lfloor{\frac{2n}{25}}\right\rfloor</math>. | By Legendre's Formula and the information given, we have that <math>3\left(\left\lfloor{\frac{n}{5}}\right\rfloor+\left\lfloor{\frac{n}{25}}\right\rfloor\right)=\left\lfloor{\frac{2n}{5}}\right\rfloor+\left\lfloor{\frac{2n}{25}}\right\rfloor</math>. | ||
− | + | We have <math>n<100</math> as there is no way that if <math>n>100</math>, <math>n!</math> would have <math>3</math> times as many zeroes as <math>(2n)!</math>. | |
First, let's plug in the number <math>5</math> | First, let's plug in the number <math>5</math> | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
After several attempts, we realize that the RHS needs <math>1</math> to <math>2</math> more "extra" zeroes than the LHS. Hence, <math>n</math> is greater than a multiple of <math>5</math>. | After several attempts, we realize that the RHS needs <math>1</math> to <math>2</math> more "extra" zeroes than the LHS. Hence, <math>n</math> is greater than a multiple of <math>5</math>. | ||
− | + | We find that the least <math>4 n's</math> are <math>8,9,13,14</math>. | |
<math>8+9+13+14=17+27=44\implies 4+4=8\implies\boxed{B}</math>. | <math>8+9+13+14=17+27=44\implies 4+4=8\implies\boxed{B}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
===Solution 3 (Bashing)=== | ===Solution 3 (Bashing)=== | ||
We notice that for a <math>0</math> to be at the end of a factorial, one multiple of five must be there. Therefore, it is intuitive to start at <math>5</math> and work up. If you bash enough you get <math>8</math>, <math>9</math>, <math>13</math>, and <math>14</math>. Going any higher will give too many zeros, and then we can stop going higher. <math>8+9+13+14=17+27=44\implies 4+4=8\implies\boxed{\textbf{(B) }8}</math>. | We notice that for a <math>0</math> to be at the end of a factorial, one multiple of five must be there. Therefore, it is intuitive to start at <math>5</math> and work up. If you bash enough you get <math>8</math>, <math>9</math>, <math>13</math>, and <math>14</math>. Going any higher will give too many zeros, and then we can stop going higher. <math>8+9+13+14=17+27=44\implies 4+4=8\implies\boxed{\textbf{(B) }8}</math>. |
Revision as of 15:56, 30 December 2019
Contents
Problem
Let be a positive integer greater than 4 such that the decimal representation of ends in zeros and the decimal representation of ends in zeros. Let denote the sum of the four least possible values of . What is the sum of the digits of ?
Solution
Solution 1
A trailing zero requires a factor of two and a factor of five. Since factors of two occur more often than factors of five, we can focus on the factors of five. We make a chart of how many trailing zeros factorials have:
We first look at the case when has zero and has zeros. If , has only zeros. But for , has zeros. Thus, and work.
Secondly, we look at the case when has zeros and has zeros. If , has only zeros. But for , has zeros. Thus, the smallest four values of that work are , which sum to . The sum of the digits of is
Solution 2
By Legendre's Formula and the information given, we have that .
We have as there is no way that if , would have times as many zeroes as .
First, let's plug in the number We get that , which is obviously not true. Hence,
After several attempts, we realize that the RHS needs to more "extra" zeroes than the LHS. Hence, is greater than a multiple of .
We find that the least are .
.
Solution 3 (Bashing)
We notice that for a to be at the end of a factorial, one multiple of five must be there. Therefore, it is intuitive to start at and work up. If you bash enough you get , , , and . Going any higher will give too many zeros, and then we can stop going higher. .
Solution 4
Let for some natural numbers , such that . Notice that . Thus For smaller , we temporarily let To minimize , we let , then Since , , the only integral value of is , from which we havve .
Now we let and , then Since , .
If , then which is a contradiction.
Thus
Finally, the sum of the four smallest possible and .
~ Nafer
See Also
2015 AMC 10B (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 22 |
Followed by Problem 24 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
All AMC 10 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.