Difference between revisions of "2018 AMC 12A Problems/Problem 23"
(→Solution 3 (Nice, I Think?)) |
Mathmagicops (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 4 (Parallel Lines)) |
||
(48 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Problem == | == Problem == | ||
+ | In <math>\triangle PAT,</math> <math>\angle P=36^{\circ},</math> <math>\angle A=56^{\circ},</math> and <math>PA=10.</math> Points <math>U</math> and <math>G</math> lie on sides <math>\overline{TP}</math> and <math>\overline{TA},</math> respectively, so that <math>PU=AG=1.</math> Let <math>M</math> and <math>N</math> be the midpoints of segments <math>\overline{PA}</math> and <math>\overline{UG},</math> respectively. What is the degree measure of the acute angle formed by lines <math>MN</math> and <math>PA?</math> | ||
+ | <math>\textbf{(A) } 76 \qquad | ||
+ | \textbf{(B) } 77 \qquad | ||
+ | \textbf{(C) } 78 \qquad | ||
+ | \textbf{(D) } 79 \qquad | ||
+ | \textbf{(E) } 80 </math> | ||
− | + | == Diagram == | |
− | + | <asy> | |
− | + | /* Made by MRENTHUSIASM */ | |
− | + | size(375); | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | == | + | pair P, A, T, U, G, M, N; |
+ | P = origin; | ||
+ | A = (10,0); | ||
+ | U = intersectionpoint(Circle(P,1),P--P+2*dir(36)); | ||
+ | G = intersectionpoint(Circle(A,1),A--A+2*dir(180-56)); | ||
+ | T = extension(P,U,A,G); | ||
+ | M = midpoint(P--A); | ||
+ | N = midpoint(U--G); | ||
+ | dot("$P$",P,1.5*SW,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$A$",A,1.5*SE,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$U$",U,1.5*(0,1),linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$G$",G,1.5*NE,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$T$",T,1.5*(0,1),linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$M$",M,1.5*S,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$N$",N,1.5*(0,1),linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | draw(P--A--T--cycle^^U--G^^M--N); | ||
+ | label("$1$",midpoint(G--A),1.5*dir(30)); | ||
+ | label("$1$",midpoint(U--P),1.5*dir(150)); | ||
+ | label("$36^\circ$",P,5*dir(18),fontsize(10)); | ||
+ | label("$56^\circ$",A,3*dir(180-56/2),fontsize(10)); | ||
+ | Label L = Label("$10$", align=(0,0), position=MidPoint, filltype=Fill(3,0,white)); | ||
+ | draw(P-(0,1)--A-(0,1), L=L, arrow=Arrows(),bar=Bars(15)); | ||
+ | add(pathticks(U--N, 2, .5, 4, 8, red)); | ||
+ | add(pathticks(N--G, 2, .5, 4, 8, red)); | ||
+ | add(pathticks(P--M, 1, .5, 0, 8, red)); | ||
+ | add(pathticks(M--A, 1, .5, 0, 8, red)); | ||
+ | </asy> | ||
+ | ~MRENTHUSIASM | ||
− | Let <math>P</math> be the origin, and <math>PA</math> lie on the x axis. | + | == Solution 1 (Trigonometry) == |
+ | Let <math>P</math> be the origin, and <math>PA</math> lie on the <math>x</math>-axis. | ||
We can find <math>U=\left(\cos(36), \sin(36)\right)</math> and <math>G=\left(10-\cos(56), \sin(56)\right)</math> | We can find <math>U=\left(\cos(36), \sin(36)\right)</math> and <math>G=\left(10-\cos(56), \sin(56)\right)</math> | ||
− | Then, we have <math>M=(5, 0)</math> and <math>N | + | Then, we have <math>M=(5, 0)</math> and <math>N</math> is the midpoint of <math>U</math> and <math>G</math>, or <math>\left(\frac{10+\cos(36)-\cos(56)}{2}, \frac{\sin(36)+\sin(56)}{2}\right)</math> |
− | Notice that the tangent of our desired points is the the absolute difference between the y coordinates of the two points divided by the absolute difference between the x coordinates of the two points. | + | Notice that the tangent of our desired points is the the absolute difference between the <math>y</math>-coordinates of the two points divided by the absolute difference between the <math>x</math>-coordinates of the two points. |
This evaluates to <cmath>\frac{\sin(36)+\sin(56)}{\cos(36)-\cos(56)}</cmath> | This evaluates to <cmath>\frac{\sin(36)+\sin(56)}{\cos(36)-\cos(56)}</cmath> | ||
Now, using sum to product identities, we have this equal to <cmath>\frac{2\sin(46)\cos(10)}{-2\sin(46)\sin({-10})}=\frac{\sin(80)}{\cos(80)}=\tan(80)</cmath> | Now, using sum to product identities, we have this equal to <cmath>\frac{2\sin(46)\cos(10)}{-2\sin(46)\sin({-10})}=\frac{\sin(80)}{\cos(80)}=\tan(80)</cmath> | ||
− | so the answer is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E)}. | + | so the answer is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E) } 80}.</math> |
+ | |||
+ | ~lifeisgood03 | ||
− | ==Solution 2 (Overkill)== | + | Note: Though this solution is excellent, setting <math>M = (0,0)</math> makes life a tad bit easier |
+ | |||
+ | ~MathleteMA | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Solution 2 (Rotation, Isosceles Triangle, Parallel Lines) == | ||
+ | We will refer to the <b>Diagram</b> section. In this solution, all angle measures are in degrees. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We rotate <math>\triangle PUM</math> by <math>180^\circ</math> about <math>M</math> to obtain <math>\triangle AU'M.</math> Let <math>H</math> be the intersection of <math>\overline{PA}</math> and <math>\overline{GU'},</math> as shown below. | ||
+ | <asy> | ||
+ | /* Made by MRENTHUSIASM */ | ||
+ | size(375); | ||
+ | |||
+ | pair P, A, T, U, G, M, N, U1, H; | ||
+ | P = origin; | ||
+ | A = (10,0); | ||
+ | U = intersectionpoint(Circle(P,1),P--P+2*dir(36)); | ||
+ | G = intersectionpoint(Circle(A,1),A--A+2*dir(180-56)); | ||
+ | T = extension(P,U,A,G); | ||
+ | M = midpoint(P--A); | ||
+ | N = midpoint(U--G); | ||
+ | U1 = rotate(180,M)*U; | ||
+ | H = intersectionpoint(P--A,G--U1); | ||
+ | fill(U--P--M--cycle^^M--U1--A--cycle,yellow); | ||
+ | dot("$P$",P,1.5*SW,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$A$",A,1.5*SE,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$U$",U,1.5*(0,1),linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$G$",G,1.5*NE,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$T$",T,1.5*(0,1),linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$M$",M,1.5*S,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$N$",N,1.5*(0,1),linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$U'$",U1,1.5*S,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$H$",H,1.5*NW,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | draw(P--A--T--cycle^^U--G^^M--N^^U--U1--A); | ||
+ | draw(G--U1,dashed); | ||
+ | label("$1$",midpoint(G--A),1.5*dir(30)); | ||
+ | label("$1$",midpoint(A--U1),1.5*dir(-30)); | ||
+ | label("$1$",midpoint(U--P),1.5*dir(150)); | ||
+ | label("$36^\circ$",P,5*dir(18),fontsize(8)); | ||
+ | label("$56^\circ$",A,2.5*dir(180-56/2),fontsize(8)); | ||
+ | label("$36^\circ$",A,2.5*dir(180+25),fontsize(8)); | ||
+ | Label L = Label("$10$", align=(0,0), position=MidPoint, filltype=Fill(3,0,white)); | ||
+ | draw(P-(0,1.5)--A-(0,1.5), L=L, arrow=Arrows(),bar=Bars(15)); | ||
+ | add(pathticks(U--N, 2, .5, 4, 8, red)); | ||
+ | add(pathticks(N--G, 2, .5, 4, 8, red)); | ||
+ | add(pathticks(U--M, 1, .5, 0, 8, red)); | ||
+ | add(pathticks(M--U1, 1, .5, 0, 8, red)); | ||
+ | </asy> | ||
+ | Note that <math>\triangle GU'A</math> is an isosceles triangle with <math>GA=U'A=1,</math> so <math>\angle AGU'=\angle AU'G=\frac{180-\angle GAU'}{2}=44.</math> In <math>\triangle GHA,</math> it follows that <math>\angle GHA=180-\angle GAH-\angle AGH=80.</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since <math>\frac{UM}{UU'}=\frac{UN}{UG}=\frac12,</math> we conclude that <math>\triangle UMN\sim\triangle UU'G</math> by SAS, from which <math>\angle UMN=\angle UU'G</math> and <math>\angle UNM=\angle UGU'.</math> By the Converse of the Corresponding Angles Postulate, we deduce that <math>\overline{MN}\parallel\overline{U'G}.</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Finally, we have <math>\angle NMA=\angle GHA=\boxed{\textbf{(E) } 80}</math> by the Corresponding Angles Postulate. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~MRENTHUSIASM | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 3 (Extending PN)== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Link <math>PN</math>, extend <math>PN</math> to <math>Q</math> so that <math>QN=PN</math>. Then link <math>QG</math> and <math>QA</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\because M,N</math> are the midpoints of <math>PA</math> and <math>PQ,</math> respectively | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\therefore MN</math> is the midsegment of <math>\bigtriangleup PAQ</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\therefore \angle QAP=\angle NMP</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Notice that <math>\bigtriangleup PUN\cong \bigtriangleup QGN</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | As a result, <math>QG=AG=UP=1</math>, <math>\angle AQG=\angle QAG</math>, <math>\angle GQN=\angle NPU</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also, <math>\angle GQN+\angle QPA=\angle QPU+\angle QPA=\angle UPA=36^{\circ}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | As a result, <math>2\angle QAG=180^{\circ}-56^{\circ}-36^{\circ}=88^{\circ}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore, <math>\angle QAP=\angle QAG+\angle TAP=56^{\circ}+44^{\circ}=100^{\circ}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since we are asked for the acute angle between the two lines, the answer to this problem is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E) } 80}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~Solution by <math>BladeRunnerAUG</math> (Frank FYC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 4 (Parallel Lines)== | ||
+ | Let the mid-point of <math>\overline{AT}</math> be <math>B</math> and the mid-point of <math>\overline{GT}</math> be <math>C</math>. | ||
+ | Since <math>BC=CG-BG</math> and <math>CG=AB-\frac{1}{2}</math>, we can conclude that <math>BC=\frac{1}{2}</math>. | ||
+ | Similarly, we can conclude that <math>BM-CN=\frac{1}{2}</math>. Construct <math>\overline{ND}\parallel\overline{BC}</math> and intersects <math>\overline{BM}</math> at <math>D</math>, which gives <math>MD=DN=\frac{1}{2}</math>. | ||
+ | Since <math>\angle{ABD}=\angle{BDN}</math>, <math>MD=DN</math>, we can find the value of <math>\angle{DMN}</math>, which is equal to <math>\frac{1}{2}\angle T=44^{\circ}</math>. Since <math>\overline{BM}\parallel\overline{PT}</math>, which means <math>\angle{DMN}+\angle{NMP}+\angle{P}=180^{\circ}</math>, we can infer that <math>\angle{NMP}=100^{\circ}</math>. | ||
+ | As we are required to give the acute angle formed, the final answer would be <math>80^{\circ}</math>, which is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E) } 80}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~Surefire2019 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 5 (Angle Bisectors)== | ||
+ | Let the bisector of <math>\angle ATP</math> intersect <math>PA</math> at <math>X.</math> We have <math>\angle ATX = \angle PTX = 44^{\circ},</math> so <math>\angle TXA = 80^{\circ}.</math> We claim that <math>MN</math> is parallel to this angle bisector, meaning that the acute angle formed by <math>MN</math> and <math>PA</math> is <math>80^{\circ},</math> meaning that the answer is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E) } 80}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | To prove this, let <math>N(x)</math> be the midpoint of <math>U(x)G(x),</math> where <math>U(x)</math> and <math>G(x)</math> are the points on <math>PT</math> and <math>AT,</math> respectively, such that <math>PU = AG = x.</math> (The points given in this problem correspond to <math>x=1,</math> but the idea we're getting at is that <math>x</math> will ultimately not matter.) Since <math>U(x)</math> and <math>G(x)</math> vary linearly with <math>x,</math> the locus of all points <math>N(x)</math> must be a line. Notice that <math>N(0) = M,</math> so <math>M</math> lies on this line. Let <math>N(x_0)</math> be the intersection of this line with <math>PT</math> (we know that this line will intersect <math>PT</math> and not <math>AT</math> because <math>PT > AT</math>). Notice that <math>G(x_0) = T.</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>AT = a, TP = b, PA = c.</math> Then <math>AG(x_0) = PU(x_0) = AT = a</math> and <math>PG(x_0) = PT = b.</math> Thus, <math>PN(x_0) = \frac{a+b}{2}.</math> By the Angle Bisector Theorem, <math>\frac{PX}{AX} = \frac{PT}{AT} = \frac{b}{a},</math> so <math>PX = \frac{bc}{a+b}.</math> Since <math>M</math> is the midpoint of <math>AP,</math> we also have <math>PM = \frac{c}{2}.</math> Notice that: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <cmath>\frac{PM}{PX} = \frac{\frac{c}{2}}{\frac{bc}{a+b}} = \frac{a+b}{2b}</cmath> | ||
+ | <cmath>\frac{PN(x_0)}{PT} = \frac{\frac{a+b}{2}}{b} = \frac{a+b}{2b}</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since <math>\frac{PN(x_0)}{PT} = \frac{PM}{PX},</math> the line containing all points <math>N(x)</math> must be parallel to <math>TX.</math> This concludes the proof. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The critical insight to finding this solution is that the length <math>1</math> probably shouldn't matter because a length ratio of <math>1:5</math> or <math>1:10</math> (as in the problem) is exceedingly unlikely to generate nice angles. This realization then motivates the idea of looking at all points similar to <math>N,</math> which then leads to looking at the most convenient such point (in this case, the one that lies on <math>PT</math>). | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~sujaykazi | ||
+ | |||
+ | Shoutout to Richard Yi and Mark Kong for working with me to discover the necessary insights to this problem! | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 6 (Overkill: Miquel Points)== | ||
Note that <math>X</math>, the midpoint of major arc <math>PA</math> on <math>(PAT)</math> is the Miquel Point of <math>PUAG</math> (Because <math>PU = AG</math>). Then, since <math>1 = \frac{UN}{NG} = \frac{PM}{MA}</math>, this spiral similarity carries <math>M</math> to <math>N</math>. Thus, we have <math>\triangle XMN \sim \triangle XAG</math>, so <math>\angle XMN = \angle XAG</math>. | Note that <math>X</math>, the midpoint of major arc <math>PA</math> on <math>(PAT)</math> is the Miquel Point of <math>PUAG</math> (Because <math>PU = AG</math>). Then, since <math>1 = \frac{UN}{NG} = \frac{PM}{MA}</math>, this spiral similarity carries <math>M</math> to <math>N</math>. Thus, we have <math>\triangle XMN \sim \triangle XAG</math>, so <math>\angle XMN = \angle XAG</math>. | ||
Line 30: | Line 169: | ||
But, we have <math>\angle XAG = \angle PAG = \angle PAX = 56 - \frac{180 - \angle PXA}{2} =56 - \frac{180 - \angle T}{2} = 56 - \frac{\angle A + \angle P}{2} = 56 - \frac{56+36}{2} = 56 - 46 = 10</math>; thus <math>\angle XMN = 10</math>. | But, we have <math>\angle XAG = \angle PAG = \angle PAX = 56 - \frac{180 - \angle PXA}{2} =56 - \frac{180 - \angle T}{2} = 56 - \frac{\angle A + \angle P}{2} = 56 - \frac{56+36}{2} = 56 - 46 = 10</math>; thus <math>\angle XMN = 10</math>. | ||
− | Then, as <math>X</math> is the midpoint of the major arc, it lies on the perpendicular bisector of <math>PA</math>, so <math>\angle XMA = 90</math>. Since we want the acute angle, we have <math>\angle NMA = \angle XMA - \angle XMN = 90 - 10 = 80</math>, so the answer is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E)}}</math>. | + | Then, as <math>X</math> is the midpoint of the major arc, it lies on the perpendicular bisector of <math>PA</math>, so <math>\angle XMA = 90</math>. Since we want the acute angle, we have <math>\angle NMA = \angle XMA - \angle XMN = 90 - 10 = 80</math>, so the answer is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E) } 80}</math>. |
+ | |||
+ | ~stronto | ||
+ | |||
+ | <u><b>Sidenote</b></u> | ||
− | + | For another way to find <math>\angle XMN</math>, note that <cmath>\angle XAM = 90 - \angle MXA = 90 - \frac{\angle AXP}{2} = 90 - \frac{\angle ATP}{2}= 90 - 44 = 46,</cmath> giving <math>\angle XMN = \angle XAG = 56 - 46 = 10</math> as desired. | |
− | ==Solution | + | == Solution 7 (Olympiad Nuke) == |
− | + | By https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h489748p2745891, we get that <math>MN</math> is parallel to the angle bisector of <math>\angle ATP.</math> Thus, <cmath>\angle NMA = 180^\circ - 56^\circ - \frac{180^\circ - 56^\circ - 36^\circ}{2} = \boxed{\textbf{(E) } 80}.</cmath> | |
− | + | == Solution 8 (Vectors) == | |
− | The | + | The argument of the average of any two unit vectors is average of the arguments of the two vectors. Thereby, the acute angle formed is <cmath>\frac{36^\circ{} + 180^\circ{} - 56^\circ{}}{2} = \boxed{\textbf{(E) } 80}.</cmath> |
− | ( | + | ~Professor-Mom (all credit for this amazing solution goes to V_Enhance) |
− | + | ||
+ | == Video Solution by Richard Rusczyk == | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://artofproblemsolving.com/videos/amc/2018amc12a/473 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~ dolphin7 | ||
==See Also== | ==See Also== | ||
{{AMC12 box|year=2018|ab=A|num-b=22|num-a=24}} | {{AMC12 box|year=2018|ab=A|num-b=22|num-a=24}} | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} |
Latest revision as of 23:53, 1 September 2024
Contents
- 1 Problem
- 2 Diagram
- 3 Solution 1 (Trigonometry)
- 4 Solution 2 (Rotation, Isosceles Triangle, Parallel Lines)
- 5 Solution 3 (Extending PN)
- 6 Solution 4 (Parallel Lines)
- 7 Solution 5 (Angle Bisectors)
- 8 Solution 6 (Overkill: Miquel Points)
- 9 Solution 7 (Olympiad Nuke)
- 10 Solution 8 (Vectors)
- 11 Video Solution by Richard Rusczyk
- 12 See Also
Problem
In and Points and lie on sides and respectively, so that Let and be the midpoints of segments and respectively. What is the degree measure of the acute angle formed by lines and
Diagram
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 1 (Trigonometry)
Let be the origin, and lie on the -axis.
We can find and
Then, we have and is the midpoint of and , or
Notice that the tangent of our desired points is the the absolute difference between the -coordinates of the two points divided by the absolute difference between the -coordinates of the two points.
This evaluates to Now, using sum to product identities, we have this equal to so the answer is
~lifeisgood03
Note: Though this solution is excellent, setting makes life a tad bit easier
~MathleteMA
Solution 2 (Rotation, Isosceles Triangle, Parallel Lines)
We will refer to the Diagram section. In this solution, all angle measures are in degrees.
We rotate by about to obtain Let be the intersection of and as shown below. Note that is an isosceles triangle with so In it follows that
Since we conclude that by SAS, from which and By the Converse of the Corresponding Angles Postulate, we deduce that
Finally, we have by the Corresponding Angles Postulate.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 3 (Extending PN)
Link , extend to so that . Then link and .
are the midpoints of and respectively
is the midsegment of
Notice that
As a result, , ,
Also,
As a result,
Therefore,
Since we are asked for the acute angle between the two lines, the answer to this problem is .
~Solution by (Frank FYC)
Solution 4 (Parallel Lines)
Let the mid-point of be and the mid-point of be . Since and , we can conclude that . Similarly, we can conclude that . Construct and intersects at , which gives . Since , , we can find the value of , which is equal to . Since , which means , we can infer that . As we are required to give the acute angle formed, the final answer would be , which is .
~Surefire2019
Solution 5 (Angle Bisectors)
Let the bisector of intersect at We have so We claim that is parallel to this angle bisector, meaning that the acute angle formed by and is meaning that the answer is .
To prove this, let be the midpoint of where and are the points on and respectively, such that (The points given in this problem correspond to but the idea we're getting at is that will ultimately not matter.) Since and vary linearly with the locus of all points must be a line. Notice that so lies on this line. Let be the intersection of this line with (we know that this line will intersect and not because ). Notice that
Let Then and Thus, By the Angle Bisector Theorem, so Since is the midpoint of we also have Notice that:
Since the line containing all points must be parallel to This concludes the proof.
The critical insight to finding this solution is that the length probably shouldn't matter because a length ratio of or (as in the problem) is exceedingly unlikely to generate nice angles. This realization then motivates the idea of looking at all points similar to which then leads to looking at the most convenient such point (in this case, the one that lies on ).
~sujaykazi
Shoutout to Richard Yi and Mark Kong for working with me to discover the necessary insights to this problem!
Solution 6 (Overkill: Miquel Points)
Note that , the midpoint of major arc on is the Miquel Point of (Because ). Then, since , this spiral similarity carries to . Thus, we have , so .
But, we have ; thus .
Then, as is the midpoint of the major arc, it lies on the perpendicular bisector of , so . Since we want the acute angle, we have , so the answer is .
~stronto
Sidenote
For another way to find , note that giving as desired.
Solution 7 (Olympiad Nuke)
By https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h489748p2745891, we get that is parallel to the angle bisector of Thus,
Solution 8 (Vectors)
The argument of the average of any two unit vectors is average of the arguments of the two vectors. Thereby, the acute angle formed is
~Professor-Mom (all credit for this amazing solution goes to V_Enhance)
Video Solution by Richard Rusczyk
https://artofproblemsolving.com/videos/amc/2018amc12a/473
~ dolphin7
See Also
2018 AMC 12A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | |
Preceded by Problem 22 |
Followed by Problem 24 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | |
All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.