Difference between revisions of "2007 USAMO Problems/Problem 5"
5849206328x (talk | contribs) (→Solutions) |
|||
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Problem == | == Problem == | ||
+ | (''Titu Andreescu'') Prove that for every [[nonnegative]] [[integer]] <math>n</math>, the number <math>7^{7^n}+1</math> is the [[product]] of at least <math>2n+3</math> (not necessarily distinct) [[prime]]s. | ||
− | + | ==Solutions== | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | == | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
=== Solution 1 === | === Solution 1 === | ||
− | + | The proof is by induction. The base is provided by the <math>n = 0</math> case, where <math>7^{7^0} + 1 = 7^1 + 1 = 2^3</math>. To prove the inductive step, it suffices to show that if <math>x = 7^{2m - 1}</math> for some positive integer <math>m</math> then <math>(x^7 + 1)/(x + 1)</math> is composite. As a consequence, <math>x^7 + 1</math> has at least two more prime factors than does <math>x + 1</math>. To confirm that <math>(x^7 + 1)/(x + 1)</math> is composite, observe that | |
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | \frac{x^7 + 1}{x + 1} &= \frac{(x + 1)^7 - ((x + 1)^7 - (x^7 + 1))}{x + 1} \\ | ||
+ | &= (x + 1)^6 - \frac{7x(x^5 + 3x^4 + 5x^3 + 5x^2 + 3x + 1)}{x + 1} \\ | ||
+ | &= (x + 1)^6 - 7x(x^4 + 2x^3 + 3x^2 + 2x + 1) \\ | ||
+ | &= (x + 1)^6 - 7^{2m}(x^2 + x + 1)^2 \\ | ||
+ | &= \{(x + 1)^3 - 7^m(x^2 + x + 1)\}\{(x + 1)^3 + 7^m(x^2 + x + 1)\}. | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | Also each factor exceeds 1. It suffices to check the smaller one; <math>\sqrt{7x}\leq x</math> gives | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | (x + 1)^3 - 7^m(x^2 + x + 1) &= (x + 1)^3 - \sqrt{7x}(x^2 + x + 1) \\ | ||
+ | &\geq x^3 + 3x^2 + 3x + 1 - x(x^2 + x + 1) \\ | ||
+ | &= 2x^2 + 2x + 1\geq 113 > 1. | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | Hence <math>(x^7 + 1)/(x + 1)</math> is composite and the proof is complete. | ||
− | + | {{alternate solutions}} | |
− | + | == See also == | |
+ | * <url>viewtopic.php?t=145849 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{{USAMO newbox|year=2007|num-b=4|num-a=6}} | {{USAMO newbox|year=2007|num-b=4|num-a=6}} | ||
− | [[Category:Olympiad | + | [[Category:Olympiad Number Theory Problems]] |
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} |
Latest revision as of 08:47, 7 August 2014
Contents
Problem
(Titu Andreescu) Prove that for every nonnegative integer , the number is the product of at least (not necessarily distinct) primes.
Solutions
Solution 1
The proof is by induction. The base is provided by the case, where . To prove the inductive step, it suffices to show that if for some positive integer then is composite. As a consequence, has at least two more prime factors than does . To confirm that is composite, observe that Also each factor exceeds 1. It suffices to check the smaller one; gives Hence is composite and the proof is complete.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See also
- <url>viewtopic.php?t=145849 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks</url>
2007 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 4 |
Followed by Problem 6 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.