Difference between revisions of "Eisenstein's criterion"
(Created page with "Let <math>a_0, a_1, ... ,a_n</math> be integers. Then, '''Eisenstein's Criterion''' states that the polynomial <math>a_nx^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+ ... + a_1x+a_0</math> cannot be facto...") |
(Proof and Extended Eisentein's Criterion) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<math> 3) a_0</math> is not divisible by <math>p^2</math> | <math> 3) a_0</math> is not divisible by <math>p^2</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Proof== | ||
+ | Assume <math>f(x)=a_nx^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots+ a_1x+a_0</math> and <math>f(x)=g(x)h(x)</math> for non-constant polynomials <math>g(x)=g_rx^r+g_{r-1}x^{r-1}+\cdots+ g_1x+g_0</math> and <math>h=h_sx^s+h_{s-1}x^{s-1}+\cdots+ h_1x+h_0</math>. Since <math>a_0</math> has only one factor of <math>p</math>, we know that <math>p|g_0</math> or <math>p|h_0</math>. WLOG, assume <math>p|g_0</math>. Then, we know that <math>a_1 \equiv g_0h_1+g_1h_0 \equiv g_1h_0 \equiv 0 \pmod{p}</math>. This means <math>p|g_1</math>. Similarily, we see, since <math>r<n</math>, <math>p|g_i</math> for all <math>0\leq i \leq r</math>. This means that <math>p|g(x)</math>, so <math>p|f(x)</math>. However, we know that <math>p\nmid a_n</math>, a contradiction. Therefore, <math>f(x)</math> is irreducible. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Extended Eisenstein's Criterion== | ||
+ | Let <math>a_0, a_1, ... ,a_n</math> be integers. Then, '''Eisenstein's Criterion''' states that the polynomial | ||
+ | <math>a_nx^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+ ... + a_1x+a_0</math> has an irreducible factor of degree more than <math>k</math> if: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math> 1) p</math> is a prime which divides each of <math>a_0,a_1,a_2,...,a_{k} </math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math> 2) a_{k+1}</math> is not divisible by <math> p</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math> 3) a_0</math> is not divisible by <math>p^2</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Proof=== | ||
+ | Let <math>f(x)=g(x)h(x)</math>, where <math>g(x)=g_rx^r+g_{r-1}x^{r-1}+\cdots+ g_1x+g_0</math> and <math>h=h_sx^s+h_{s-1}x^{s-1}+\cdots+ h_1x+h_0</math>. Since <math>a_0</math> has only one factor of <math>p</math>, we know that <math>p|g_0</math> or <math>p|h_0</math>. WLOG, assume <math>p|g_0</math>. Then, we know that <math>a_1 \equiv g_0h_1+g_1h_0 \equiv g_1h_0 \equiv 0 \pmod{p}</math>. This means <math>p|g_1</math>. Similarily, we see, if <math>r\leq k</math>, <math>p|g_i</math> for all <math>0\leq i \leq r</math>. This means that <math>p|g(x)</math>, so <math>p|f(x)</math>. However, we know that <math>p\nmid a_{k+1}</math>, a contradiction. Therefore, <math>r\geq k+1</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} |
Latest revision as of 13:47, 14 August 2018
Let be integers. Then, Eisenstein's Criterion states that the polynomial cannot be factored into the product of two non-constant polynomials if:
is a prime which divides each of
is not divisible by
is not divisible by
Proof
Assume and for non-constant polynomials and . Since has only one factor of , we know that or . WLOG, assume . Then, we know that . This means . Similarily, we see, since , for all . This means that , so . However, we know that , a contradiction. Therefore, is irreducible.
Extended Eisenstein's Criterion
Let be integers. Then, Eisenstein's Criterion states that the polynomial has an irreducible factor of degree more than if:
is a prime which divides each of
is not divisible by
is not divisible by
Proof
Let , where and . Since has only one factor of , we know that or . WLOG, assume . Then, we know that . This means . Similarily, we see, if , for all . This means that , so . However, we know that , a contradiction. Therefore, .
This article is a stub. Help us out by expanding it.