Difference between revisions of "1995 USAMO Problems/Problem 4"
Euler brick (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Suppose <math>q_1,q_2,...</math> is an infinite sequence of integers satisfying the following two conditions: (a) <math>m - n </math> divides <math>q_m - q_n</math> for <math>m>...") |
Yojan sushi (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ==Problem== | ||
Suppose <math>q_1,q_2,...</math> is an infinite sequence of integers satisfying the following two conditions: | Suppose <math>q_1,q_2,...</math> is an infinite sequence of integers satisfying the following two conditions: | ||
Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
Prove that there is a polynomial <math>Q</math> such that <math>q_n = Q(n)</math> for each <math>n</math>. | Prove that there is a polynomial <math>Q</math> such that <math>q_n = Q(n)</math> for each <math>n</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution== | ||
+ | Step 1: Suppose <math>P</math> has degree <math>d</math>. Let <math>Q</math> be the polynomial of degree at most <math>d</math> with <math>Q(x)=q_x</math> for <math>0\leq x\leq d</math>. Since the <math>q_x</math> are all integers, <math>Q</math> has rational coefficients, and there exists <math>k</math> so that <math>kQ</math> has integer coefficients. Then <math>m-n|kQ(m)-kQ(n)</math> for all <math>m,n\in \mathbb N_0</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Step 2: We show that <math>Q</math> is the desired polynomial. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>x>n</math> be given. Now | ||
+ | <cmath>kq_x\equiv kq_m\pmod{x-m}\text{ for all integers }m\in[0,d]</cmath> | ||
+ | Since <math>kQ(x)</math> satisfies these relations as well, and <math>kq_m=kQ(m)</math>, | ||
+ | <cmath>kq_x\equiv kQ(x)\pmod{x-m}\text{ for all integers }m\in[0,d]</cmath> | ||
+ | and hence | ||
+ | <cmath>kq_x\equiv kQ(x)\pmod{\text{lcm}(x,x-1,\ldots, x-d)}. \;(1) | ||
+ | </cmath> | ||
+ | Now | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | \text{lcm}(x,x-1,\ldots, x-i-1)&=\text{lcm}[\text{lcm}(x,x-1,\ldots, x-i),x-i-1]\\ | ||
+ | &=\frac{\text{lcm}(x,x-1,\ldots, x-i)(x-i-1)}{\text{gcd}[\text{lcm}(x,x-1,\ldots, x-i),(x-i-1)]}\\ | ||
+ | &\geq \frac{\text{lcm}(x,x-1,\ldots, x-i)(x-i-1)}{\text{gcd}[x(x-1)\cdots(x-i),(x-i-1)]}\\ | ||
+ | &\geq \frac{\text{lcm}(x,x-1,\ldots, x-i)(x-i-1)}{(i+1)!} | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
+ | so by induction <math>\text{lcm}(x,x-1,\ldots, x-d)\geq \frac{x(x-1)\cdots (x-d)}{d!(d-1)!\cdots 1!}</math>. Since <math>P(x), Q(x)</math> have degree <math>d</math>, for large enough <math>x</math> (say <math>x>L</math>) we have <math>\left|Q(x)\pm\frac{x(x-1)\cdots (x-d)}{kd!(d-1)!\cdots 1!}\right|>P(x)</math>. By (1) <math>kq_x</math> must differ by a multiple of <math>\text{lcm}(x,x-1,\ldots, x-d)</math> from <math>kQ(x)</math>; hence <math>q_x</math> must differ by a multiple of <math>\frac{x(x-1)\cdots (x-d)}{kd!(d-1)!\cdots 1!}</math> from <math>Q(x)</math>, and for <math>x>L</math> we must have <math>q_x=Q(x)</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now for any <math>y</math> we have <math>kQ(y)\equiv kQ(x)\equiv kq_x \equiv kq_y\pmod{x-y}</math> for any <math>x>L</math>. Since <math>x-y</math> can be arbitrarily large, we must have <math>Q(y)=q_y</math>, as needed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==See Also== | ||
+ | {{USAMO box|year=1995|num-b=3|num-a=5}} | ||
+ | {{MAA Notice}} | ||
+ | [[Category:Olympiad Algebra Problems]] |
Latest revision as of 14:27, 11 May 2018
Problem
Suppose is an infinite sequence of integers satisfying the following two conditions:
(a) divides for
(b) There is a polynomial such that for all .
Prove that there is a polynomial such that for each .
Solution
Step 1: Suppose has degree . Let be the polynomial of degree at most with for . Since the are all integers, has rational coefficients, and there exists so that has integer coefficients. Then for all .
Step 2: We show that is the desired polynomial.
Let be given. Now Since satisfies these relations as well, and , and hence Now so by induction . Since have degree , for large enough (say ) we have . By (1) must differ by a multiple of from ; hence must differ by a multiple of from , and for we must have .
Now for any we have for any . Since can be arbitrarily large, we must have , as needed.
See Also
1995 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 3 |
Followed by Problem 5 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.