Difference between revisions of "Talk:Ceva's Theorem"
m (Feel free to edit/upload image.) |
m |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Feel free to edit or upload as you see fit [billydorminy.homelinux.com/aopswiki/cevathm.png]. --[[User:Solafidefarms|solafidefarms]] 16:04, 23 June 2006 (EDT) | Feel free to edit or upload as you see fit [billydorminy.homelinux.com/aopswiki/cevathm.png]. --[[User:Solafidefarms|solafidefarms]] 16:04, 23 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It would be nicer if the image were cropped, but it's good to see images popping up in the AoPSWiki!--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 17:14, 23 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The planetmath proof MUST BE REWRITTEN! AoPS is NOT accepting the viral GNU documentation license. Please rewrite this proof in your own words.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 17:15, 23 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | What happened to the image Billy? --[[User:Joml88|Joe]] 10:15, 18 August 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nevermind, I added my own image and rewrote the proof. Hm, I just realized that I left out the 'sufficient' part of the 'necessary and sufficient'.... --[[User:Joml88|Joe]] 11:08, 18 August 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Eh, I'll finish the trig formulation proof later. Getting annoyed at the TeX right now. --[[User:Joml88|Joe]] 09:27, 22 December 2006 (EST) | ||
Latest revision as of 09:27, 22 December 2006
Feel free to edit or upload as you see fit [billydorminy.homelinux.com/aopswiki/cevathm.png]. --solafidefarms 16:04, 23 June 2006 (EDT)
It would be nicer if the image were cropped, but it's good to see images popping up in the AoPSWiki!--MCrawford 17:14, 23 June 2006 (EDT)
The planetmath proof MUST BE REWRITTEN! AoPS is NOT accepting the viral GNU documentation license. Please rewrite this proof in your own words.--MCrawford 17:15, 23 June 2006 (EDT)
What happened to the image Billy? --Joe 10:15, 18 August 2006 (EDT)
Nevermind, I added my own image and rewrote the proof. Hm, I just realized that I left out the 'sufficient' part of the 'necessary and sufficient'.... --Joe 11:08, 18 August 2006 (EDT)
Eh, I'll finish the trig formulation proof later. Getting annoyed at the TeX right now. --Joe 09:27, 22 December 2006 (EST)
