Difference between revisions of "Talk:Natural number"

 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Mathematicians haven't decided on the official definition of <math>\mathbb{N}</math>. --[[User:Chess64|Chess64]] 18:06, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
 
Mathematicians haven't decided on the official definition of <math>\mathbb{N}</math>. --[[User:Chess64|Chess64]] 18:06, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
Notation like <math>\mathbb{N}</math> should definitely be left for the intermediate section of the article.  The Introductory section should include a more plain-English definition.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 21:19, 21 June 2006 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 20:19, 21 June 2006

Mathematicians haven't decided on the official definition of $\mathbb{N}$. --Chess64 18:06, 19 June 2006 (EDT)


Notation like $\mathbb{N}$ should definitely be left for the intermediate section of the article. The Introductory section should include a more plain-English definition.--MCrawford 21:19, 21 June 2006 (EDT)