Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sieve of Eratosthenes"
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This was in the article but I took this out: | This was in the article but I took this out: | ||
− | + | ''It would be nice to really run the sieve up to 15 or 20; unfortunately, I could not find any good way to represent circled and crossed out numbers; italic and bold styles are not distinctive enough and to create crossed numbers in LaTeX is a headache. Maybe somebody else has an idea how to do it...'' | |
− | Things like this need to go on the discussion page instead of the main article page. [[User:Joml88|Joe]] 15:59, 19 June 2006 (EDT) | + | Things like this need to go on the discussion page instead of the main article page. |
+ | [[User:Joml88|Joe]] 15:59, 19 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | I recommend somebody build a picture for the sieve. Also, the external link is not appropriate. We should simply build our own content.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 16:02, 19 June 2006 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 15:02, 19 June 2006
This was in the article but I took this out:
It would be nice to really run the sieve up to 15 or 20; unfortunately, I could not find any good way to represent circled and crossed out numbers; italic and bold styles are not distinctive enough and to create crossed numbers in LaTeX is a headache. Maybe somebody else has an idea how to do it...
Things like this need to go on the discussion page instead of the main article page. Joe 15:59, 19 June 2006 (EDT)
I recommend somebody build a picture for the sieve. Also, the external link is not appropriate. We should simply build our own content.--MCrawford 16:02, 19 June 2006 (EDT)