Difference between revisions of "Well Ordering Principle"
(New page: The '''Well Ordering Principle''' states that every nonempty set of positive integers contains a smallest member. {{stub}} Category:Axioms) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | The '''Well Ordering Principle''' states that every nonempty | + | The '''Well Ordering Principle''' states that every nonempty subset of the positive integers <math>\mathbb{Z}^{+}</math> contains a smallest element. While this theorem is mostly brushed off as common sense, there is a bit of formalism required to actually prove it sufficiently. We will do this here. |
− | {{ | + | |
− | + | '''Definition''': A subset <math>A</math> of the real numbers is said to be inductive if it contains the number <math>1</math>, and if for every <math>x\in A</math>, the number <math>x+1\in A</math> as well. Let <math>\mathcal{A}</math> be the collection of all the inductive subsets of <math>\mathbb{R}</math>. Then the positive integers denoted <math>\mathbb{Z}^{+}</math> are defined by the equation | |
+ | <center><math>\mathbb{Z}^{+}=\bigcap_{A\in \mathcal{A}}A</math>.</center> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Using this definition, we can rephrase the principle of mathematical induction as follows: if <math>A</math> is an inductive set of the positive integers, then <math>A=\mathbb{Z}^{+}</math>. We can now proceed with the proof. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ''Proof'': We first show that for any <math>n\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}</math>, every nonempty subset of <math>\{1,2,\ldots, n\}</math> has a smallest element. Let <math>A</math> be the set of all positive integers <math>n</math> where this statement holds. We see <math>A</math> contains <math>1</math>, since if <math>n=1</math> then the only subset of <math>\{1,2,\ldots, n\}</math> is <math>\{1\}</math> itself. Then, supposing <math>A</math> contains <math>n</math> we show that it must contain <math>n+1</math>. Let <math>C</math> be a nonempty subset of <math>\{1,2,\ldots, n+1\}</math>. If <math>C=\{n+1\}</math> then <math>n+1</math> is its smallest element. Otherwise, consider <math>C\cap \{1,2,\ldots,n\}</math>, which is nonempty. Because <math>n\in A</math>, this set has a smallest element, which will be the smallest element of <math>C</math> also. This means that <math>A</math> is inductive and <math>A=\mathbb{Z}^{+}</math>, so the statement is true for all <math>n\in\mathbb{Z}^{+}</math>. | ||
+ | Now suppose <math>D\in \mathbb{Z}^{+}</math> is nonempty. By choosing some <math>n\in D</math>, the set <math>A\cap\{1,2\ldots, n\}</math> is also nonempty which means that <math>A</math> has a smallest element <math>k</math>. This means that <math>k</math> is the smallest element of <math>D</math> too, which completes the proof <math>\square</math> |
Latest revision as of 21:20, 12 May 2022
The Well Ordering Principle states that every nonempty subset of the positive integers contains a smallest element. While this theorem is mostly brushed off as common sense, there is a bit of formalism required to actually prove it sufficiently. We will do this here.
Definition: A subset of the real numbers is said to be inductive if it contains the number , and if for every , the number as well. Let be the collection of all the inductive subsets of . Then the positive integers denoted are defined by the equation
Using this definition, we can rephrase the principle of mathematical induction as follows: if is an inductive set of the positive integers, then . We can now proceed with the proof.
Proof: We first show that for any , every nonempty subset of has a smallest element. Let be the set of all positive integers where this statement holds. We see contains , since if then the only subset of is itself. Then, supposing contains we show that it must contain . Let be a nonempty subset of . If then is its smallest element. Otherwise, consider , which is nonempty. Because , this set has a smallest element, which will be the smallest element of also. This means that is inductive and , so the statement is true for all .
Now suppose is nonempty. By choosing some , the set is also nonempty which means that has a smallest element . This means that is the smallest element of too, which completes the proof