Difference between revisions of "Talk:Harmonic mean"
IntrepidMath (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Why not just make an article called RMS-AM-GM-HM? --[[User:Chess64|Chess64]] 18:22, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | Why not just make an article called RMS-AM-GM-HM? --[[User:Chess64|Chess64]] 18:22, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think we should have an individual article for each mean, and then have big ones for major inequalities, RMS-AM-GM-HM, AM-GM, etc. --[[User:IntrepidMath|IntrepidMath]] 18:24, 18 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:24, 18 June 2006
I'm not sure I like the chosen name or statement of the inequality chain. Any thoughts on this? --MCrawford 17:45, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
I slightly changed the statement. It is now more explictly labeled. I have never seen this expressed other than AM-HM-GM, so I can't really change that...--IntrepidMath 17:54, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
I just corrected the inequality (HM is the least one of the three, not the middle one!) and added the positivity assumption. --fedja
Why not just make an article called RMS-AM-GM-HM? --Chess64 18:22, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
I think we should have an individual article for each mean, and then have big ones for major inequalities, RMS-AM-GM-HM, AM-GM, etc. --IntrepidMath 18:24, 18 June 2006 (EDT)
