Difference between revisions of "1970 IMO Problems/Problem 5"
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Problem== | ==Problem== | ||
+ | |||
In the tetrahedron <math>ABCD</math>, angle <math>BDC</math> is a right angle. Suppose that the foot <math>H</math> of the perpendicular from <math>D</math> to the plane <math>ABC</math> in the tetrahedron is the intersection of the altitudes of <math>\triangle ABC</math>. Prove that | In the tetrahedron <math>ABCD</math>, angle <math>BDC</math> is a right angle. Suppose that the foot <math>H</math> of the perpendicular from <math>D</math> to the plane <math>ABC</math> in the tetrahedron is the intersection of the altitudes of <math>\triangle ABC</math>. Prove that | ||
Line 7: | Line 8: | ||
For what tetrahedra does equality hold? | For what tetrahedra does equality hold? | ||
+ | |||
==Solution== | ==Solution== | ||
+ | |||
Let us show first that angles <math>ADB</math> and <math>ADC</math> are also right. Let <math>H</math> be the intersection of the altitudes | Let us show first that angles <math>ADB</math> and <math>ADC</math> are also right. Let <math>H</math> be the intersection of the altitudes | ||
of <math>ABC</math> and let <math>CH</math> meet <math>AB</math> at <math>E</math>. Planes <math>CED</math> and <math>ABC</math> are perpendicular and <math>AB</math> is perpendicular to | of <math>ABC</math> and let <math>CH</math> meet <math>AB</math> at <math>E</math>. Planes <math>CED</math> and <math>ABC</math> are perpendicular and <math>AB</math> is perpendicular to | ||
Line 21: | Line 24: | ||
We have equality if and only if we have equality in Cauchy's inequality, which means <math>AB = BC = CA.</math> | We have equality if and only if we have equality in Cauchy's inequality, which means <math>AB = BC = CA.</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>x = DH, a = BC, b = CA, c = AB</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Prob_1970_5.png|400px]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | The plan of this proof is to compute <math>HA, HB, HC</math> in terms of <math>a, b, c</math>, then | ||
+ | compute <math>DA^2, DB^2, DC^2</math> in terms of <math>a, b, c, x</math>, impose the condition that | ||
+ | <math>\angle BDC = \pi/2</math> to determine <math>x</math>, and calculate <math>DA^2 + DB^2 + DC^2</math> in | ||
+ | terms of <math>a, b, c</math>. The problem will become a simple inequality in <math>a, b, c</math> | ||
+ | which will be easy to prove. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Formulas for the distance from the orthocenter to the vertices are reasonably | ||
+ | well known, but to make this solution self contained, we compute them here. | ||
+ | From <math>\triangle ABE_B</math> we have that <math>BE_B = c \sin A</math>. From <math>\triangle CBE</math> | ||
+ | we have <math>BE = a \cos B</math>. From <math>\triangle ABE_B \sim \triangle HBE</math> we have | ||
+ | <math>\frac{HB}{c} = \frac{BE}{BE_B}</math>. It follows that | ||
+ | <math>HB = c \ \frac{a \cos B}{c \sin A} = \frac{a \cos B}{\sin A}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Similarly, we have <math>HC = \frac{a \cos C}{\sin A}</math> and | ||
+ | <math>HA = \frac{b \cos A}{\sin B} = \frac{a \cos A}{\sin A}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | (In the last equality we used the [[Law of Sines]]: | ||
+ | <math>\frac{a}{\sin A} = \frac{b}{\sin B} = \frac{c}{\sin C}.</math> We want to have | ||
+ | <math>\sin A</math> at the denominator to simplify computations.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Then <math>DA^2 = x^2 + \frac{a^2 \cos^2 A}{\sin^2 A}, | ||
+ | DB^2 = x^2 + \frac{a^2 \cos^2 B}{\sin^2 A}, | ||
+ | DC^2 = x^2 + \frac{a^2 \cos^2 C}{\sin^2 A}</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Since <math>\angle BDC = \pi/2, DB^2 + DC^2 = a^2</math>. This yields | ||
+ | <math>x^2 = \frac{a^2}{2 \sin^2 A} \ (\sin^2 A - \cos^2 B - \cos^2 C)</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Using this value for <math>x^2</math> we get | ||
+ | <math>DA^2 + DB^2 + DC^2 = | ||
+ | \frac{a^2}{2 \sin^2 A} \ (3 \sin^2 A + 2 \cos^2 A - \cos^2 B - \cos^2 C)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | After some simplifications, and using again the [[Law of Sines]], this becomes | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>DA^2 + DB^2 + DC^2 = | ||
+ | \frac{a^2}{2 \sin^2 A} \ (\sin^2 A + \sin^2 B + \sin^2 C) = | ||
+ | \frac{a^2}{2} + \frac{a^2}{2 \sin^2 A} \sin^2 B + \frac{a^2}{2 \sin^2 A} \sin^2 C =</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\frac{a^2}{2} + \frac{b^2}{2 \sin^2 B} \sin^2 B + \frac{c^2}{2 \sin^2 C} \sin^2 C = | ||
+ | \frac{1}{2} \ (a^2 + b^2 + c^2)</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | What we need to prove then is that <math>(a + b + c)^2 \le 3(a^2 + b^2 + c^2)</math>. We could | ||
+ | invoke the [[Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality]] like in the first solution, but we can | ||
+ | just as well make the computations, and notice that this is equivalent to | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>2 a^2 + 2 b^2 + 2 c^2 -2ab - 2bc - 2ca \ge 0</math> or | ||
+ | <math>(a - b)^2 + (b - c)^2 + (c - a)^2 \ge 0</math>, which is always true. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We also see that we have equality if and only if <math>a = b = c</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [Solution by pf02, December 2024] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:40, 7 December 2024
Problem
In the tetrahedron , angle is a right angle. Suppose that the foot of the perpendicular from to the plane in the tetrahedron is the intersection of the altitudes of . Prove that
.
For what tetrahedra does equality hold?
Solution
Let us show first that angles and are also right. Let be the intersection of the altitudes of and let meet at . Planes and are perpendicular and is perpendicular to the line of intersection . Hence is perpendicular to the plane and hence to . So Also Therefore But so , so angle . But angle , so is perpendicular to the plane , and hence angle = . Similarly, angle . Hence .
But now we are done, because Cauchy's inequality (applied to vectors and ) gives .
We have equality if and only if we have equality in Cauchy's inequality, which means
Solution 2
Let
The plan of this proof is to compute in terms of , then compute in terms of , impose the condition that to determine , and calculate in terms of . The problem will become a simple inequality in which will be easy to prove.
Formulas for the distance from the orthocenter to the vertices are reasonably well known, but to make this solution self contained, we compute them here. From we have that . From we have . From we have . It follows that .
Similarly, we have and .
(In the last equality we used the Law of Sines: We want to have at the denominator to simplify computations.)
Then .
Since . This yields .
Using this value for we get
After some simplifications, and using again the Law of Sines, this becomes
.
What we need to prove then is that . We could invoke the Cauchy-Schwarz Inequality like in the first solution, but we can just as well make the computations, and notice that this is equivalent to
or , which is always true.
We also see that we have equality if and only if .
[Solution by pf02, December 2024]
1970 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 4 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 6 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |