Difference between revisions of "1970 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
m (Take out a link to a page which does not exist.) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
<cmath> \frac{A_{n-1}}{A_n} = 1 - \frac{x_n a^n}{A_n} < 1 - \frac{x_n b^n}{B_n} = \frac{B_{n-1}}{B_n} . </cmath> | <cmath> \frac{A_{n-1}}{A_n} = 1 - \frac{x_n a^n}{A_n} < 1 - \frac{x_n b^n}{B_n} = \frac{B_{n-1}}{B_n} . </cmath> | ||
On the other hand, if <math>a=b</math>, then evidently <math>A_{n-1}/A_n = B_{n-1}/B_n</math>, and if <math>a < b</math>, then by what we have just shown, <math>A_{n-1}/A_n > B_{n-1}/B_n</math>. Hence <math>A_{n-1}/A_n < B_{n-1}/B_n</math> if and only if <math>a>b</math>, as desired. <math>\blacksquare</math> | On the other hand, if <math>a=b</math>, then evidently <math>A_{n-1}/A_n = B_{n-1}/B_n</math>, and if <math>a < b</math>, then by what we have just shown, <math>A_{n-1}/A_n > B_{n-1}/B_n</math>. Hence <math>A_{n-1}/A_n < B_{n-1}/B_n</math> if and only if <math>a>b</math>, as desired. <math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Remarks (added by pf02, November 2024)== | ||
+ | |||
+ | 1. A comment about the problem: it is disappointing. It is surprisingly | ||
+ | easy compared to other problems given at an International Mathematical | ||
+ | Olympiad, and frankly, uninteresting. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 2. It is not stated with the usual rigor typical at this competition. The | ||
+ | problem is really the following two statements: | ||
+ | |||
+ | S1: Let <math>a, b, n > 0</math> and <math>x_n, x_{n-1}, \cdots, x_0</math> be integers, | ||
+ | <math>x_k < a, b</math> for all <math>k</math>, <math>x_n > 0</math>, and <math>x_{n-1}, \cdots, x_0</math> not all <math>0</math>. | ||
+ | Define <math>A_n, A_{n-1}, B_n, B_{n-1}</math> as described in the problem. If | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\frac{A_{n-1}}{A_{n}} < \frac{B_{n-1}}{B_{n}}\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (1)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | then <math>a > b</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | S2: If <math>a > b</math>, then (1) is true for any <math>x_n, x_{n-1}, \cdots, x_0</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 3. I will give a variation of the solution in which the computations | ||
+ | and argumentation are slightly simpler and more direct. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 2== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Rewrite inequality (1), and give a few steps in which we state | ||
+ | equivalent inequalities: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\frac{x_{n-1} a^{n-1} + \cdots + x_1 a + x_0}{x_n a^n + x_{n-1} a^{n-1} + \cdots + x_1 a + x_0} < | ||
+ | \frac{x_{n-1} b^{n-1} + \cdots + x_1 b + x_0}{x_n b^n + x_{n-1} b^{n-1} + \cdots + x_1 b + x_0}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\frac{x_{n-1} a^{n-1} + \cdots + x_1 a + x_0}{x_n a^n} < | ||
+ | \frac{x_{n-1} b^{n-1} + \cdots + x_1 b + x_0}{x_n b^n}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\frac{x_{n-1} a^{n-1} + \cdots + x_1 a + x_0}{a^n} < | ||
+ | \frac{x_{n-1} b^{n-1} + \cdots + x_1 b + x_0}{b^n}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>x_{n-1} \frac{1}{a} + \cdots + x_1 \frac{1}{a^{n-1}} + x_0 \frac{1}{a^n} < | ||
+ | x_{n-1} \frac{1}{b} + \cdots + x_1 \frac{1}{b^{n-1}} + x_0 \frac{1}{b^n}\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ (2)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Now it is clear that if <math>a > b</math> then (2) is true for any | ||
+ | <math>x_n, x_{n-1}, \cdots, x_0</math>. This proves statement S2 from the Remarks. | ||
+ | |||
+ | (Note that the problem said <math>x_n, x_{n-1} > 0</math>. This is not necessary. | ||
+ | All we need is that <math>x_n > 0</math> and at least one of <math>x_{n-1}, \cdots, x_1, x_0</math> | ||
+ | is <math>\neq 0</math>.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | We prove statement S1 from the Remarks by contradiction. We want to show | ||
+ | that if (1) is true for some <math>x_n, \cdots, x_1, x_0</math>, then <math>a > b</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Assume <math>a \le b</math>. If we had <math>a = b</math> then (1) would be an equality, not an | ||
+ | inequality. | ||
+ | |||
+ | If <math>a < b</math> then by S1, it would follow that | ||
+ | <math>\frac{A_{n-1}}{A_{n}} > \frac{B_{n-1}}{B_{n}}</math> for all values of | ||
+ | <math>x_n, \cdots, x_1, x_0</math> which contradicts the hypothesis. Either way, we | ||
+ | get a contradiction, which proves S1. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [Solution by pf02, November 2024] | ||
Latest revision as of 18:28, 26 November 2024
Problem
Let , and be integers greater than 1, and let and be the bases of two number systems. and are numbers in the system with base and and are numbers in the system with base ; these are related as follows:
,
,
.
Prove:
if and only if .
Solution
Suppose . Then for all integers , , with equality only when or . (In particular, we have strict inequality for .) In summation, this becomes or which is equivalent to This implies On the other hand, if , then evidently , and if , then by what we have just shown, . Hence if and only if , as desired.
Remarks (added by pf02, November 2024)
1. A comment about the problem: it is disappointing. It is surprisingly easy compared to other problems given at an International Mathematical Olympiad, and frankly, uninteresting.
2. It is not stated with the usual rigor typical at this competition. The problem is really the following two statements:
S1: Let and be integers, for all , , and not all . Define as described in the problem. If
then .
S2: If , then (1) is true for any .
3. I will give a variation of the solution in which the computations and argumentation are slightly simpler and more direct.
Solution 2
Rewrite inequality (1), and give a few steps in which we state equivalent inequalities:
Now it is clear that if then (2) is true for any . This proves statement S2 from the Remarks.
(Note that the problem said . This is not necessary. All we need is that and at least one of is .)
We prove statement S1 from the Remarks by contradiction. We want to show that if (1) is true for some , then .
Assume . If we had then (1) would be an equality, not an inequality.
If then by S1, it would follow that for all values of which contradicts the hypothesis. Either way, we get a contradiction, which proves S1.
[Solution by pf02, November 2024]
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
Resources
1970 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |