Difference between revisions of "1999 USAMO Problems/Problem 3"
Mathophobia (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
Mathophobia (talk | contribs) (→Solution) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
(This solution makes absolutely no sense. Why is <math>k^4\equiv 1</math>? And how do we know that only <math>3</math> and <math>5</math> work!?) | (This solution makes absolutely no sense. Why is <math>k^4\equiv 1</math>? And how do we know that only <math>3</math> and <math>5</math> work!?) | ||
− | why can't you have 2,2,2,4 p = 5 r=1? it doesn't say distinct integers | + | why can't you have a,b,c,d = 2,2,2,4 p = 5 r=1? it doesn't say distinct integers |
== See Also == | == See Also == |
Latest revision as of 00:18, 11 November 2024
Problem
Let be a prime and let be integers not divisible by , such that for any integer not divisible by . Prove that at least two of the numbers , , , , , are divisible by . (Note: denotes the fractional part of .)
Solution
We see that means that . Now, since does not divide and is prime, their GCD is 1 so .
Since , then we see that they have to represent mods , and thus, our possible values of are all such that for all that are relatively prime to . This happens when or .
When then is not divisible by 3, thus two are , and the other two are . Thus, four pairwise sums sum to 3.
When then is not divisible by 5 so are and , so two pairwise sums sum to 5.
All three possible cases work so we are done.
(This solution makes absolutely no sense. Why is ? And how do we know that only and work!?) why can't you have a,b,c,d = 2,2,2,4 p = 5 r=1? it doesn't say distinct integers
See Also
1999 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 2 |
Followed by Problem 4 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.