Difference between revisions of "2024 AMC 10A Problems/Problem 6"
(→Solution 2) |
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) (→Video Solution by SpreadTheMathLove) |
||
(33 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Problem == | == Problem == | ||
What is the minimum number of successive swaps of adjacent letters in the string <math>ABCDEF</math> that are needed to change the string to <math>FEDCBA?</math> (For example, <math>3</math> swaps are required to change <math>ABC</math> to <math>CBA;</math> one such sequence of swaps is | What is the minimum number of successive swaps of adjacent letters in the string <math>ABCDEF</math> that are needed to change the string to <math>FEDCBA?</math> (For example, <math>3</math> swaps are required to change <math>ABC</math> to <math>CBA;</math> one such sequence of swaps is | ||
− | <math>ABC\ | + | <math>ABC\to BAC\to BCA\to CBA.</math>) |
<math>\textbf{(A)}~6\qquad\textbf{(B)}~10\qquad\textbf{(C)}~12\qquad\textbf{(D)}~15\qquad\textbf{(E)}~24</math> | <math>\textbf{(A)}~6\qquad\textbf{(B)}~10\qquad\textbf{(C)}~12\qquad\textbf{(D)}~15\qquad\textbf{(E)}~24</math> | ||
− | == Solution == | + | == Solution 1 (Analysis) == |
Procedurally, it takes: | Procedurally, it takes: | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
~MRENTHUSIASM | ~MRENTHUSIASM | ||
− | == Solution 2 == | + | == Solution 2 (Recursive Approach)== |
− | |||
We can proceed by a recursive tactic on the number of letters in the string. | We can proceed by a recursive tactic on the number of letters in the string. | ||
Line 35: | Line 34: | ||
There are <math>6</math> moves needed to change <math>ABCD</math> to <math>DCBA</math>. | There are <math>6</math> moves needed to change <math>ABCD</math> to <math>DCBA</math>. | ||
− | We see a pattern of <math>0,1,3,6,...</math>. We notice that the difference between consecutive terms is increasing by <math>1</math>, so in the same way, for <math>5</math> letters, we would need <math>10</math> moves, and for <math>6</math>, we would need <math>\boxed{15}</math> moves. | + | We see a pattern of <math>0,1,3,6,...</math>. We notice that the difference between consecutive terms is increasing by <math>1</math>, so in the same way, for <math>5</math> letters, we would need <math>10</math> moves, and for <math>6</math>, we would need <math>\boxed{\textbf{(D)}~15}</math> moves. |
Thinking why, when we start making these moves, we see that for a string of length <math>n</math>, it takes <math>n-1</math> moves to move the last letter to the front. After, we get a string that will be changed identically to a string of length <math>n-1</math>. This works in our pattern above and is another way to think about the problem! | Thinking why, when we start making these moves, we see that for a string of length <math>n</math>, it takes <math>n-1</math> moves to move the last letter to the front. After, we get a string that will be changed identically to a string of length <math>n-1</math>. This works in our pattern above and is another way to think about the problem! | ||
~world123 | ~world123 | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Note: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The sequence consists of triangular numbers shifted a term up (as it starts with <math>0</math> on term <math>1</math> and <math>1</math> on term <math>2</math>.) | ||
+ | Thus, our explicit formula is <cmath>\dfrac{(n-1)(n+1-1)}{2} = \dfrac{(n)(n-1)}{2}</cmath> and as <math>n = 6</math> in this case (<math>6</math> letters), our answer is <math>\dfrac{(6)(6-1)}{2} = \boxed{\textbf{(D)}~15}</math> ~ NSAoPS | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Solution 3 (Solution 2 Done Fast)== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can see that the most efficient way to change <math>ABCDEF</math> to <math>FEDCBA</math> is the same as changing <math>ABCDE</math> to <math>EDCBA</math> and then moving <math>F</math> to the front in <math>5</math> moves. Similarly, this would carry on downwards, where to change <math>ABCDE</math> to <math>EDCBA</math> would be to change <math>ABCD</math> to <math>DCBA</math> and move <math>E</math> <math>4</math> times to the front. This pattern will carry on until <math>AB</math> to <math>BA</math> would be <math>1</math>, and <math>A</math> to <math>A</math> would be <math>0</math>. The answer would be <math>0(A)+1(B)+2(C)+3(D)+4(E)+5(F)</math>, which is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(D)}~15}</math> moves. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~Moonwatcher22 | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Solution 4 (If you don't notice anything)== | ||
+ | Simply, just blindly doing it, the most straightforward way is to shift F all the way back. From ABCDEF: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ABCDFE -> ABCFDE -> ABFCDE -> AFBCDE -> FABCDE | ||
+ | |||
+ | For E: | ||
+ | |||
+ | FABCED -> FABECD -> FAEBCD -> FEABCD | ||
+ | |||
+ | For D: | ||
+ | |||
+ | FEABDC -> FEADBC -> FEDABC | ||
+ | |||
+ | For C: | ||
+ | |||
+ | FEDACB -> FEDCAB | ||
+ | |||
+ | For B: | ||
+ | |||
+ | FEDCBA | ||
+ | |||
+ | That's it, you don't need to do it with A. Still <math>\boxed{\textbf{(D)}~15}</math> moves. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~pepper2831 | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 5 (Inversions of Permutations)== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let the letters <math>A, B, C, D, E, F</math> correspond to the numbers <math>1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6</math> respectively. We want to find the number of swaps required to transform the permutation <math>1 2 3 4 5 6</math> into the permutation <math>6 5 4 3 2 1</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here, we let <math>1 2 3 4 5 6</math> be the natural order. Then the total number of inversions of the permutation <math>6 5 4 3 2 1</math> is <math>1+2+3+4+5=15</math>. Hence the answer is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(D)}~15}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~tsun26 | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Video Solution by Pi Academy == | ||
+ | https://youtu.be/6qYaJsgqkbs?si=K2Ebwqg-Ro8Yqoiv | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Video Solution 1 by Power Solve == | ||
+ | https://youtu.be/j-37jvqzhrg?si=ieBRx0-CUihcKttE&t=616 | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Video Solution by Daily Dose of Math == | ||
+ | |||
+ | https://youtu.be/-EFTk2pBFug | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~Thesmartgreekmathdude | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Video Solution by SpreadTheMathLove== | ||
+ | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_o5zagJVe1U | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Video Solution by Just Math⚡== | ||
+ | https://youtu.be/KrkjGpk1uZs | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
{{AMC10 box|year=2024|ab=A|num-b=5|num-a=7}} | {{AMC10 box|year=2024|ab=A|num-b=5|num-a=7}} | ||
{{MAA Notice}} | {{MAA Notice}} |
Latest revision as of 23:57, 17 November 2024
Contents
- 1 Problem
- 2 Solution 1 (Analysis)
- 3 Solution 2 (Recursive Approach)
- 4 Solution 3 (Solution 2 Done Fast)
- 5 Solution 4 (If you don't notice anything)
- 6 Solution 5 (Inversions of Permutations)
- 7 Video Solution by Pi Academy
- 8 Video Solution 1 by Power Solve
- 9 Video Solution by Daily Dose of Math
- 10 Video Solution by SpreadTheMathLove
- 11 Video Solution by Just Math⚡
- 12 See also
Problem
What is the minimum number of successive swaps of adjacent letters in the string that are needed to change the string to (For example, swaps are required to change to one such sequence of swaps is )
Solution 1 (Analysis)
Procedurally, it takes:
- swaps for to move to the sixth spot, giving
- swaps for to move to the fifth spot, giving
- swaps for to move to the fourth spot, giving
- swaps for to move to the third spot, giving
- swap for to move to the second spot (so becomes the first spot), giving
Together, the answer is
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 2 (Recursive Approach)
We can proceed by a recursive tactic on the number of letters in the string.
Looking at the string , there are moves needed to change it to the string
Then, there is move to change to .
Similarly, there is moves needed for three letters (said in the problem).
There are moves needed to change to .
We see a pattern of . We notice that the difference between consecutive terms is increasing by , so in the same way, for letters, we would need moves, and for , we would need moves.
Thinking why, when we start making these moves, we see that for a string of length , it takes moves to move the last letter to the front. After, we get a string that will be changed identically to a string of length . This works in our pattern above and is another way to think about the problem!
~world123
Note:
The sequence consists of triangular numbers shifted a term up (as it starts with on term and on term .) Thus, our explicit formula is and as in this case ( letters), our answer is ~ NSAoPS
Solution 3 (Solution 2 Done Fast)
We can see that the most efficient way to change to is the same as changing to and then moving to the front in moves. Similarly, this would carry on downwards, where to change to would be to change to and move times to the front. This pattern will carry on until to would be , and to would be . The answer would be , which is moves.
~Moonwatcher22
Solution 4 (If you don't notice anything)
Simply, just blindly doing it, the most straightforward way is to shift F all the way back. From ABCDEF:
ABCDFE -> ABCFDE -> ABFCDE -> AFBCDE -> FABCDE
For E:
FABCED -> FABECD -> FAEBCD -> FEABCD
For D:
FEABDC -> FEADBC -> FEDABC
For C:
FEDACB -> FEDCAB
For B:
FEDCBA
That's it, you don't need to do it with A. Still moves.
~pepper2831
Solution 5 (Inversions of Permutations)
Let the letters correspond to the numbers respectively. We want to find the number of swaps required to transform the permutation into the permutation .
Here, we let be the natural order. Then the total number of inversions of the permutation is . Hence the answer is
~tsun26
Video Solution by Pi Academy
https://youtu.be/6qYaJsgqkbs?si=K2Ebwqg-Ro8Yqoiv
Video Solution 1 by Power Solve
https://youtu.be/j-37jvqzhrg?si=ieBRx0-CUihcKttE&t=616
Video Solution by Daily Dose of Math
~Thesmartgreekmathdude
Video Solution by SpreadTheMathLove
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_o5zagJVe1U
Video Solution by Just Math⚡
See also
2024 AMC 10A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 5 |
Followed by Problem 7 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | ||
All AMC 10 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.