Art of Problem Solving
AoPS Online
Math texts, online classes, and more
for students in grades 5-12.
Visit AoPS Online ‚
Books for Grades 5-12 Online Courses
Beast Academy
Engaging math books and online learning
for students ages 6-13.
Visit Beast Academy ‚
Books for Ages 6-13 Beast Academy Online
AoPS Academy
Small live classes for advanced math
and language arts learners in grades 2-12.
Visit AoPS Academy ‚
Find a Physical Campus Visit the Virtual Campus

Difference between revisions of "1965 IMO Problems/Problem 5"
m
 
(5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
  
 
This solution is a simplified version of the previous solution,
 
This solution is a simplified version of the previous solution,
−
it fills in some gaps. and it provides more information.  The
+
it fills in some gaps. and it provides more information.
−
idea is to just follow the degrees of the expressions and
 
−
equations in <math>\lambda, x, y</math> involved.  If we manage to conclude
 
−
that the equation for <math>H</math> is an equation of degree <math>1</math>, then we
 
−
will know that it is a line.  We don't need to know the equation
 
−
explicitly.
 
  
 
Just like in the previous solution, we use analytic (coordinate)
 
Just like in the previous solution, we use analytic (coordinate)
 
geometry, but we don't care how the axes are chosen.
 
geometry, but we don't care how the axes are chosen.
 +
 +
Let <math>A, B, O</math> have coordinates <math>(a_1, a_2), (b_1, b_2), (c_1, c_2)</math>,
 +
and let
 +
<math>M = (\lambda a_1 + (1 - \lambda b_1, \lambda a_2 + (1 - \lambda b_2)</math>
 +
with <math>\lambda \in [0, 1]</math>.
 +
The idea is to just follow the degrees of the expressions and
 +
equations in <math>\lambda, x, y</math> involved as we make the computations
 +
for obtaining the coordinates of <math>H</math>, and the equation of the
 +
curve <math>H</math> is on.  We will see that the equation for <math>H</math> is an
 +
equation of degree <math>1</math>, so we will know that it is a line.  We
 +
don't need to write out the equation explicitly.
  
 
The coordinates of <math>M</math> are expressions of degree <math>1</math> in <math>\lambda</math>.
 
The coordinates of <math>M</math> are expressions of degree <math>1</math> in <math>\lambda</math>.
  
−
The equation for <math>MP</math> is an equation of degree <math>1</math> in <math>x, y</math>
+
The equation for <math>MP</math> (the perpendicular from <math>M</math> to <math>OA</math>) is an
−
with constant coefficients for <math>x, y</math>, and whose constant term
+
equation of degree <math>1</math> in <math>x, y</math> with constant coefficients for
−
is an expression of degree <math>1</math> in <math>\lambda</math>.
+
<math>x, y</math>, and whose constant term is an expression of degree <math>1</math>
 +
in <math>\lambda</math>.
  
−
The coordinates of <math>P</math> (the intersection of <math>MP</math> and <math>OA</math>) are
+
The coordinates of <math>P</math> (the foot of the perpendicular from <math>P</math> to
−
expressions of degree <math>1</math> in <math>\lambda</math>.
+
<math>OA</math>) are expressions of degree <math>1</math> in <math>\lambda</math>.
  
 
The equation of the perpendicular from <math>P</math> to <math>OB</math> is of degree
 
The equation of the perpendicular from <math>P</math> to <math>OB</math> is of degree
Line 54: Line 61:
  
 
Now, in principle, we would have to solve the system of two
 
Now, in principle, we would have to solve the system of two
−
equations to obtain the coordinates of <math>H</math> as expressions
+
equations (1) and (2) to obtain the coordinates of <math>H</math> as
−
of <math>\lambda</math>, and then eliminate <math>\lambda</math> to obtain an
+
expressions of <math>\lambda</math>, and then eliminate <math>\lambda</math> to
−
equation in <math>x, y</math>.  Or, as a shortcut, we can eliminate
+
obtain the equation in <math>x, y</math> for <math>H</math>.  As a shortcut, we
−
<math>\lambda</math> directly from the two equations.  Either way,
+
can eliminate <math>\lambda</math> directly from the two equations (1)
−
the result is an equation of degree <math>1</math> in <math>x, y</math>.
+
and (2).  Either way, the result is an equation of degree
 +
<math>1</math> in <math>x, y</math>.
  
−
This tells us that the locus is on this line.  We just need to
+
This tells us that the locus is on a line.  We just need to
−
specify which set of points on this line is the locus.
+
specify which set of points on this line is the locus.  And,
 +
we want to make the line explicit.
  
 
The previous solution, with a good amount of hand waving, tells
 
The previous solution, with a good amount of hand waving, tells
Line 82: Line 91:
 
<math>\triangle OAB</math> from <math>A, B</math>.  This answers question (a).
 
<math>\triangle OAB</math> from <math>A, B</math>.  This answers question (a).
  
−
Again with a good amount of hand waving, the previous solution
+
For part (b) of the problem, with a good amount of hand waving,
−
says "the locus consists in the <math>\triangle OB_1A_1</math>".  We justify
+
the previous solution says "the locus consists in the
−
this by pointing out that if <math>M</math> is inside <math>\triangle OAB</math>, then
+
<math>\triangle OB_1A_1</math>".  We justify this by pointing out that if
−
we can take the triangle <math>\triangle OA'B'</math>, such that <math>A' \in OA</math>,
+
<math>M</math> is inside <math>\triangle OAB</math>, then we can take the triangle
−
<math>B' \in OB</math>, <math>A'B'</math> going through <math>M</math> and parallel to <math>AB</math>.  Then
+
<math>\triangle OA'B'</math>, such that <math>A' \in OA</math>, <math>B' \in OB</math>,
−
<math>H</math> will be on the corresponding segment <math>A_1'B_1'</math> determined by
+
<math>A'B'</math> going through <math>M</math> and parallel to <math>AB</math>.  Then <math>H</math> will
−
the feet of the perpendiculars in <math>\triangle OA'B'</math>.  Conversely,
+
be on the corresponding segment <math>A_1'B_1'</math> determined by the
 +
feet of the perpendiculars in <math>\triangle OA'B'</math>.  Conversely,
 
it is easy to see that any point <math>H \in \triangle OA_1B_1</math> is on
 
it is easy to see that any point <math>H \in \triangle OA_1B_1</math> is on
 
a segment <math>A_1'B_1'</math> obtained from a triangle <math>\triangle OA'B'</math>,
 
a segment <math>A_1'B_1'</math> obtained from a triangle <math>\triangle OA'B'</math>,
Line 94: Line 104:
 
question (b).
 
question (b).
  
−
(Solution by pf02, October 2024)
+
[Solution by pf02, October 2024]
  
  
 
== Solution 3 ==
 
== Solution 3 ==
  
 +
This solution is elementary, it does not use analytic geometry.
 +
 +
Let <math>A_1</math> be the foot of the perpendicular from <math>A</math> to <math>OB</math>, and
 +
<math>B_1</math> be the foot of the perpendicular from <math>B</math> to <math>OA</math>.  Construct
 +
<math>H</math> as described in the statement of the problem.
 +
 +
[[File:prob_1965_5.png|900px]]
  
 +
We will prove that <math>H \in A_1B_1</math>.
  
 +
First, as shown in the second picture, take <math>MQ \perp OB</math>, and let <math>H_1</math>
 +
be the intersection of <math>A_1B_1</math> with the perpendicular from <math>Q</math> to <math>OA</math>.
 +
From the triangle <math>\triangle BAA_1</math> we have
 +
<math>\frac{AM}{MB} = \frac{A_1Q}{QB}</math> because <math>AA_1 \parallel MQ</math>. From the
 +
triangle <math>\triangle A_1BB_1</math> we have
 +
<math>\frac{A_1Q}{QB} = \frac{A_1H_1}{H_1B_1}</math> because <math>QH_1 \parallel BB_1</math>.
 +
So, <math>\frac{AM}{MB} = \frac{A_1H_1}{H_1B_1}</math>.
  
 +
Second, as shown in the third picture, take <math>MP \perp OA</math>, and let <math>H_2</math>
 +
be the intersection of <math>A_1B_1</math> with the perpendicular from <math>P</math> to <math>OB</math>.
 +
By a similar argument, we have <math>\frac{AM}{MB} = \frac{A_1H_2}{H_2B_1}</math>.
  
 +
It follows that <math>H_1 = H_2</math> since the two points divide <math>A_1B_1</math> in the
 +
same ratio.  This is the point <math>H</math> from the statement of the problem.
  
 +
The solution to the problem is now completed by repeating the last two
 +
paragraphs from Solution 2.
  
−
TO BE CONTINUED.  SAVING MID WAY, SO I DON'T LOSE WORK DONE SO FAR.
+
[Solution by pf02, October 2024]
  
  
 
== See Also ==  
 
== See Also ==  
 
{{IMO box|year=1965|num-b=4|num-a=6}}
 
{{IMO box|year=1965|num-b=4|num-a=6}}

Latest revision as of 18:05, 10 November 2024

Problem

Consider $\triangle OAB$ with acute angle $AOB$. Through a point $M \neq O$ perpendiculars are drawn to $OA$ and $OB$, the feet of which are $P$ and $Q$ respectively. The point of intersection of the altitudes of $\triangle OPQ$ is $H$. What is the locus of $H$ if $M$ is permitted to range over (a) the side $AB$, (b) the interior of $\triangle OAB$?


Solution

Let $O(0,0),A(a,0),B(b,c)$. Equation of the line $AB: y=\frac{c}{b-a}(x-a)$. Point $M \in AB : M(\lambda,\frac{c}{b-a}(\lambda-a))$. Easy, point $P(\lambda,0)$. Point $Q = OB \cap MQ$, $MQ \bot OB$. Equation of $OB : y=\frac{c}{b}x$, equation of $MQ : y=-\frac{b}{c}(x-\lambda)+\frac{c}{b-a}(\lambda-a)$. Solving: $x_{Q}=\frac{1}{b^{2}+c^{2}}\left[b^{2}\lambda+\frac{c^{2}(\lambda-a)b}{b-a}\right]$. Equation of the first altitude: $x=\frac{1}{b^{2}+c^{2}}\left[b^{2}\lambda+\frac{c^{2}(\lambda-a)b}{b-a}\right] \quad (1)$. Equation of the second altitude: $y=-\frac{b}{c}(x-\lambda)\quad\quad (2)$. Eliminating $\lambda$ from (1) and (2): \[ac \cdot x + (b^{2}+c^{2}-ab)y=abc\] a line segment $MN , M \in OA , N \in OB$. Second question: the locus consists in the $\triangle OMN$.


Solution 2

This solution is a simplified version of the previous solution, it fills in some gaps. and it provides more information.

Just like in the previous solution, we use analytic (coordinate) geometry, but we don't care how the axes are chosen.

Let $A, B, O$ have coordinates $(a_1, a_2), (b_1, b_2), (c_1, c_2)$, and let $M = (\lambda a_1 + (1 - \lambda b_1, \lambda a_2 + (1 - \lambda b_2)$ with $\lambda \in [0, 1]$. The idea is to just follow the degrees of the expressions and equations in $\lambda, x, y$ involved as we make the computations for obtaining the coordinates of $H$, and the equation of the curve $H$ is on. We will see that the equation for $H$ is an equation of degree $1$, so we will know that it is a line. We don't need to write out the equation explicitly.

The coordinates of $M$ are expressions of degree $1$ in $\lambda$.

The equation for $MP$ (the perpendicular from $M$ to $OA$) is an equation of degree $1$ in $x, y$ with constant coefficients for $x, y$, and whose constant term is an expression of degree $1$ in $\lambda$.

The coordinates of $P$ (the foot of the perpendicular from $P$ to $OA$) are expressions of degree $1$ in $\lambda$.

The equation of the perpendicular from $P$ to $OB$ is of degree $1$ in $x, y$, with constant coefficients for $x, y$, and whose constant term is an expression of degree $1$ in $\lambda$. This corresponds to equation (2) in the above solution.

Similarly, the equation of the perpendicular from $Q$ to $OA$ is of degree $1$ in $x, y$, with constant coefficients for $x, y$, and whose constant term is an expression of degree $1$ in $\lambda$. This corresponds to equation (1) in the above solution.

Now, in principle, we would have to solve the system of two equations (1) and (2) to obtain the coordinates of $H$ as expressions of $\lambda$, and then eliminate $\lambda$ to obtain the equation in $x, y$ for $H$. As a shortcut, we can eliminate $\lambda$ directly from the two equations (1) and (2). Either way, the result is an equation of degree $1$ in $x, y$.

This tells us that the locus is on a line. We just need to specify which set of points on this line is the locus. And, we want to make the line explicit.

The previous solution, with a good amount of hand waving, tells us that the solution is "a line segment $B_1A_1, B_1 \in OA, A_1 \in OB$". (On top of the hand waving the solution uses the unhappy notation $M$ for $B_1$ and $N$ for $A_1$, which is bad because $M$ has already been used!) We will do better than that.

Let $A_1$ be the foot of the perpendicular from $A$ to $OB$, and $B_1$ be the foot of the perpendicular from $B$ to $OA$. (For this paragraph see the picture shown in Solution 3.) Consider the limit situation when $M = A$. Then $Q = A_1$, and $P = A$. It follows that the intersection $H$ of the perpendiculars from $P$ to $OB$ and $Q$ to $OA$ is $A_1$. Similarly, the limit situation when $M = B$ yields $H = B_1$. Now it is reasonable to say that when $M$ moves from $A$ to $B$, $H$ moves from $A_1$ to $B_1$. So, the locus is the line segment joining the feet $A_1, B_1$ of the perpendiculars in $\triangle OAB$ from $A, B$. This answers question (a).

For part (b) of the problem, with a good amount of hand waving, the previous solution says "the locus consists in the $\triangle OB_1A_1$". We justify this by pointing out that if $M$ is inside $\triangle OAB$, then we can take the triangle $\triangle OA'B'$, such that $A' \in OA$, $B' \in OB$, $A'B'$ going through $M$ and parallel to $AB$. Then $H$ will be on the corresponding segment $A_1'B_1'$ determined by the feet of the perpendiculars in $\triangle OA'B'$. Conversely, it is easy to see that any point $H \in \triangle OA_1B_1$ is on a segment $A_1'B_1'$ obtained from a triangle $\triangle OA'B'$, and $H$ is obtained from a point $M \in A'B'$. This answers question (b).

[Solution by pf02, October 2024]


Solution 3

This solution is elementary, it does not use analytic geometry.

Let $A_1$ be the foot of the perpendicular from $A$ to $OB$, and $B_1$ be the foot of the perpendicular from $B$ to $OA$. Construct $H$ as described in the statement of the problem.

Prob 1965 5.png

We will prove that $H \in A_1B_1$.

First, as shown in the second picture, take $MQ \perp OB$, and let $H_1$ be the intersection of $A_1B_1$ with the perpendicular from $Q$ to $OA$. From the triangle $\triangle BAA_1$ we have $\frac{AM}{MB} = \frac{A_1Q}{QB}$ because $AA_1 \parallel MQ$. From the triangle $\triangle A_1BB_1$ we have $\frac{A_1Q}{QB} = \frac{A_1H_1}{H_1B_1}$ because $QH_1 \parallel BB_1$. So, $\frac{AM}{MB} = \frac{A_1H_1}{H_1B_1}$.

Second, as shown in the third picture, take $MP \perp OA$, and let $H_2$ be the intersection of $A_1B_1$ with the perpendicular from $P$ to $OB$. By a similar argument, we have $\frac{AM}{MB} = \frac{A_1H_2}{H_2B_1}$.

It follows that $H_1 = H_2$ since the two points divide $A_1B_1$ in the same ratio. This is the point $H$ from the statement of the problem.

The solution to the problem is now completed by repeating the last two paragraphs from Solution 2.

[Solution by pf02, October 2024]


See Also

1965 IMO (Problems) • Resources
Preceded by
Problem 4 		1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 Followed by
Problem 6
All IMO Problems and Solutions
Retrieved from "https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=1965_IMO_Problems/Problem_5&oldid=233114"