Difference between revisions of "1988 IMO Problems/Problem 6"
Bobwang001 (talk | contribs) (Ph.D degree, IMO coach,https://www.youtube.com/@math000) |
Franklin2013 (talk | contribs) (→Solution 3) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usEQRx4J_ew ~KevinChen_Yay | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usEQRx4J_ew ~KevinChen_Yay | ||
− | |||
− | |||
==Solution 3== | ==Solution 3== | ||
Given that <math>ab+1</math> divides <math>a^2+b^2</math>, we have <math>a^2+b^2=k(ab+1)</math> for some integer <math>k</math>. | Given that <math>ab+1</math> divides <math>a^2+b^2</math>, we have <math>a^2+b^2=k(ab+1)</math> for some integer <math>k</math>. | ||
Line 60: | Line 58: | ||
Simplifying, we have <math>b^2=k</math>. Therefore, <math>\frac{a^2+b^2}{ab+1}=\frac{(kb-b)^2+b^2}{b(k)+1}=\frac{b^2}{b+1}=b</math>, which is the square of an integer. | Simplifying, we have <math>b^2=k</math>. Therefore, <math>\frac{a^2+b^2}{ab+1}=\frac{(kb-b)^2+b^2}{b(k)+1}=\frac{b^2}{b+1}=b</math>, which is the square of an integer. | ||
By M. Nazaryan. | By M. Nazaryan. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{IMO box|year=1988|num-b=5|after=Last question}} |
Latest revision as of 19:24, 25 September 2024
Contents
Problem
Let and be positive integers such that divides . Show that is the square of an integer.
Video Solution
Solution 1
Choose integers such that Now, for fixed , out of all pairs choose the one with the lowest value of . Label . Thus, is a quadratic in . Should there be another root, , the root would satisfy: Thus, isn't a positive integer (if it were, it would contradict the minimality condition). But , so is an integer; hence, . In addition, so that . We conclude that so that .
This construction works whenever there exists a solution for a fixed , hence is always a perfect square.
Solution 2 (Sort of Root Jumping)
We proceed by way of contradiction.
WLOG, let and fix to be the nonsquare positive integer such that such that or Choose a pair out of all valid pairs such that is minimized. Expanding and rearranging, This quadratic has two roots, and , such that WLOG, let . By Vieta's, and From , is an integer, because both and are integers.
From is nonzero since is not square, from our assumption.
We can plug in for in the original expression, because yielding . If then and and because is a positive integer.
We construct the following inequalities: since is positive. Adding , contradicting the minimality of
-Benedict T (countmath1)
Video Solution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usEQRx4J_ew ~KevinChen_Yay
Solution 3
Given that divides , we have for some integer .
Expanding the right side, we get . Rearranging terms, we have .
Consider this as a quadratic equation in . By the quadratic formula, we have
For to be an integer, the discriminant must be a perfect square. Let for some integer .
Rearranging terms, we get . Factoring the right side, we have .
Thus, and or . In either case, we have .
Substitute back into , we get .
Simplifying, we have . Therefore, , which is the square of an integer. By M. Nazaryan.
1988 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 5 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Last question |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |