Difference between revisions of "1991 USAMO Problems/Problem 2"
(problem and solution) |
m (→Resources) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
{{alternate solutions}} | {{alternate solutions}} | ||
− | == | + | == See Also == |
{{USAMO box|year=1991|num-b=1|num-a=3}} | {{USAMO box|year=1991|num-b=1|num-a=3}} | ||
* [http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=356425#p356425 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks] | * [http://www.artofproblemsolving.com/Forum/viewtopic.php?p=356425#p356425 Discussion on AoPS/MathLinks] | ||
+ | {{MAA Notice}} | ||
[[Category:Olympiad Algebra Problems]] | [[Category:Olympiad Algebra Problems]] |
Latest revision as of 06:38, 19 July 2016
Problem
For any nonempty set of numbers, let and denote the sum and product, respectively, of the elements of . Prove that where "" denotes a sum involving all nonempty subsets of .
Solution
Let denote the set . Since , the empty sum, is equal to zero, and , the empty product, is equal to 1, the equation is equivalent to the desired equation when . We will prove this equation, but first, we prove a lemma.
Lemma. For all nonnegative integers , .
Proof. Evidently, But the terms of this sum are the coefficients of the polynomial , and the sum of the coefficients of this polynomial is as desired.
We now prove our equation by induction on . For , we have the simple equation 0=0.
Suppose the equation holds when . Then By inductive hypothesis, and by the lemma, Since , our equation thus holds by induction. Thus the problem statement is proven.
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.
See Also
1991 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
Followed by Problem 3 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.