Difference between revisions of "1990 OIM Problems/Problem 1"
(Created page with "== Problem == Let <math>f</math> be a function defined in the set of integers greater or equal to zero such that: (i) If <math>n=2^j-1</math>, for all <math>n=0, 1, 2, \cdots...") |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<cmath>f(n)+n=2^k-1</cmath> | <cmath>f(n)+n=2^k-1</cmath> | ||
− | b. Calculate <math>f(2^1990)</math>. | + | b. Calculate <math>f(2^{1990})</math>. |
~translated into English by Tomas Diaz. ~orders@tomasdiaz.com | ~translated into English by Tomas Diaz. ~orders@tomasdiaz.com | ||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
− | {{ | + | |
+ | '''Part a.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>f(2^j-1)=0</math>, <math>f(2^j)=-1</math>, <math>f(2^j+1)=-2</math>, and so on.. | ||
+ | |||
+ | So we pick a range where <math>f(n)\ne 0</math> which is <math>2^j-1<2^j+b<2^{j+1}-1</math> where <math>b</math> is a non-negative integer. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore, <math>2^j\le2^j+b\le2^{j+1}-2</math> which provides the range for <math>b</math> as: <math>0\le b \le 2^{j+1}-2-2^j</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | In that range, this gives <math>f(2^j+b)=-(b+1)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | When <math>n=2^j-1</math>, <math>f(n)+n=f(2^j-1)+2^j-1=0+2^j-1=2^k-1</math> which proves the equality since <math>j=k</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | When <math>n \ne 2^j-1</math>, <math>f(n)+n=f(2^j+b)+2^j+b=-(b+1)+2^j+b=2^j-1=2^k-1</math> which also proves the equality since <math>j=k</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''Part b.''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>f(2^{1990})=f(2^{1990}-1)-1=0-1=-1</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | * This seems to be one of the easiest problems I've seen in these types of competitions, unless I'm missing something. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~Tomas Diaz. orders@tomasdiaz.com | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{Alternate solutions}} | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
https://www.oma.org.ar/enunciados/ibe5.htm | https://www.oma.org.ar/enunciados/ibe5.htm |
Latest revision as of 00:21, 23 December 2023
Problem
Let be a function defined in the set of integers greater or equal to zero such that:
(i) If , for all then
(ii) If , for all then
a. Prove that for all integer , greater or equal to zero, there exist an integer grater than zero such that
b. Calculate .
~translated into English by Tomas Diaz. ~orders@tomasdiaz.com
Solution
Part a.
, , , and so on..
So we pick a range where which is where is a non-negative integer.
Therefore, which provides the range for as:
In that range, this gives
When , which proves the equality since .
When , which also proves the equality since .
Part b.
- This seems to be one of the easiest problems I've seen in these types of competitions, unless I'm missing something.
~Tomas Diaz. orders@tomasdiaz.com
Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.