Difference between revisions of "2021 AIME I Problems/Problem 13"

Latest revision as of 07:40, 4 February 2025

Problem

Circles $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$ with radii $961$ and $625$ , respectively, intersect at distinct points $A$ and $B$ . A third circle $\omega$ is externally tangent to both $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$ . Suppose line $AB$ intersects $\omega$ at two points $P$ and $Q$ such that the measure of minor arc $\widehat{PQ}$ is $120^{\circ}$ . Find the distance between the centers of $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$ .

Quick, Olympiad-Style Solution

Let $D\equiv\omega\cap\omega_{1}$ and $E\equiv\omega\cap\omega_{2}$ . The solution relies on the following key claim:

Claim. $DPEQ$ is a harmonic quadrilateral.

Proof. Using the radical axis theorem, the tangents to circle $\omega$ at $D$ and $E$ are concurrent with line $\overline{ABPQ}$ at the radical center, implying that our claim is true by harmonic quadrilateral properties. $\blacksquare$

Thus, we deduce the tangents to $\omega$ at $P$ and $Q$ are concurrent at $F$ with line $\overline{DE}$ . Denote by $O_{1}, O_{2}, O$ the centers of $\omega_{1}, \omega_{2}, \omega$ respectively.

Now suppose $G\equiv\overline{FDE}\cap\overline{O_{1}O_{2}}$ . Note that $\overline{OF}\parallel\overline{O_{1}O_{2}}$ giving us the pairs of similar triangles $\triangle O_{1}GD\sim\triangle OFD~\text{and}~\triangle O_{2}GE\sim\triangle OFE.$ We thereby obtain $\dfrac{O_{1}G}{O_{1}D}=\dfrac{OF}{OD}=\dfrac{r\sec\tfrac{120^{\circ}}{2}}{r}=\sec 60^{\circ}=2$ since $\widehat{PQ}=120^{\circ}$ , where $r$ denotes the radius of $\omega$ , and $\dfrac{O_{2}G}{O_{2}E}=\dfrac{OF}{OE}=\sec 60^{\circ}=2$ as well. It follows that $O_{1}O_{2}=O_{1}G-O_{2}G=2(O_{1}D-O_{2}E)=2(961-625)=\textbf{672}.$

Solution 1 (Radical Axis)

Let $O_i$ and $r_i$ be the center and radius of $\omega_i$ , and let $O$ and $r$ be the center and radius of $\omega$ .

Since $\overline{AB}$ extends to an arc with arc $120^\circ$ , the distance from $O$ to $\overline{AB}$ is $r/2$ . Let $X=\overline{AB}\cap \overline{O_1O_2}$ . Consider $\triangle OO_1O_2$ . The line $\overline{AB}$ is perpendicular to $\overline{O_1O_2}$ and passes through $X$ . Let $H$ be the foot from $O$ to $\overline{O_1O_2}$ ; so $HX=r/2$ . We have by tangency $OO_1=r+r_1$ and $OO_2=r+r_2$ . Let $O_1O_2=d$ . $[asy] unitsize(3cm); pointpen=black; pointfontpen=fontsize(9); pair A=dir(110), B=dir(230), C=dir(310); DPA(A--B--C--A); pair H = foot(A, B, C); draw(A--H); pair X = 0.3*B + 0.7*C; pair Y = A+X-H; draw(X--1.3*Y-0.3*X); draw(A--Y, dotted); pair R1 = 1.3*X-0.3*Y; pair R2 = 0.7*X+0.3*Y; draw(R1--X); D("O",A,dir(A)); D("O_1",B,dir(B)); D("O_2",C,dir(C)); D("H",H,dir(270)); D("X",X,dir(225)); D("A",R1,dir(180)); D("B",R2,dir(180)); draw(rightanglemark(Y,X,C,3)); [/asy]$ Since $X$ is on the radical axis of $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$ , it has equal power with respect to both circles, so $O_1X^2 - r_1^2 = O_2X^2-r_2^2 \implies O_1X-O_2X = \frac{r_1^2-r_2^2}{d}$ since $O_1X+O_2X=d$ . Now we can solve for $O_1X$ and $O_2X$ , and in particular, $\begin{align*} O_1H &= O_1X - HX = \frac{d+\frac{r_1^2-r_2^2}{d}}{2} - \frac{r}{2} \\ O_2H &= O_2X + HX = \frac{d-\frac{r_1^2-r_2^2}{d}}{2} + \frac{r}{2}. \end{align*}$ We want to solve for $d$ . By the Pythagorean Theorem (twice): $\begin{align*} &\qquad -OH^2 = O_2H^2 - (r+r_2)^2 = O_1H^2 - (r+r_1)^2 \\ &\implies \left(d+r-\tfrac{r_1^2-r_2^2}{d}\right)^2 - 4(r+r_2)^2 = \left(d-r+\tfrac{r_1^2-r_2^2}{d}\right)^2 - 4(r+r_1)^2 \\ &\implies 2dr - 2(r_1^2-r_2^2)-8rr_2-4r_2^2 = -2dr+2(r_1^2-r_2^2)-8rr_1-4r_1^2 \\ &\implies 4dr = 8rr_2-8rr_1 \\ &\implies d=2r_2-2r_1 \end{align*}$ Therefore, $d=2(r_2-r_1) = 2(961-625)=\boxed{672}$ .

Solution 2 (Linearity)

Let $O_{1}$ , $O_{2}$ , and $O$ be the centers of $\omega_{1}$ , $\omega_{2}$ , and $\omega$ with $r_{1}$ , $r_{2}$ , and $r$ their radii, respectively. Then, the distance from $O$ to the radical axis $\ell\equiv\overline{AB}$ of $\omega_{1}, \omega_{2}$ is equal to $\frac{1}{2}r$ . Let $x=O_{1}O_{2}$ and $O^{\prime}$ the orthogonal projection of $O$ onto line $\ell$ . Define the function $f:\mathbb{R}^{2}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ by $f(X)=\text{Pow}_{\omega_{1}}(X)-\text{Pow}_{\omega_{2}}(X).$ Then $\begin{align*} f(O_{1})=-r_{1}^{2}-(x-r_{2})(x+r_{2})&=-x^{2}+r_{2}^{2}-r_{1}^{2}, \\ f(O_{2})=(x-r_{1})(x+r_{1})-(-r_{2}^{2})&=x^{2}+r_{2}^{2}-r_{1}^{2}, \\ f(O)=r(r+2r_{1})-r(r+2r_{2})&=2r(r_{1}-r_{2}), \\ f(O^{\prime})&=0. \end{align*}$ By linearity, $\frac{f(O_{2})-f(O_{1})}{f(O)-f(O^{\prime})}=\frac{O_{1}O_{2}}{OO^{\prime}}=\frac{x}{\tfrac{1}{2}r}=\frac{2x}{r}.$ Notice that $f(O_{2})-f(O_{1})=x^{2}-(-x^{2})=2x^{2}$ and $f(O)-f(O^{\prime})=2r(r_{1}-r_{2})$ , thus $\begin{align*}\frac{2x^{2}}{2r(r_{1}-r_{2})}&=\frac{2x}{r}\end{align*}$ Dividing both sides by $\frac{2x}{r}$ (which is obviously nonzero as $x$ is nonzero) gives us $\begin{align*}\frac{x}{2(r_{1}-r_{2})}&=1\end{align*}$ so $x=2(r_{1}-r_{2})$ . Since $r_{1}=961$ and $r_{2}=625$ , the answer is $x=2\cdot(961-625)=\boxed{672}$ .

Solution 3

Denote by $O_1$ , $O_2$ , and $O$ the centers of $\omega_1$ , $\omega_2$ , and $\omega$ , respectively. Let $R_1 = 961$ and $R_2 = 625$ denote the radii of $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$ respectively, $r$ be the radius of $\omega$ , and $\ell$ the distance from $O$ to the line $AB$ . We claim that $\dfrac{\ell}{r} = \dfrac{R_2-R_1}{d},$ where $d = O_1O_2$ . This solves the problem, for then the $\widehat{PQ} = 120^\circ$ condition implies $\tfrac{\ell}r = \cos 60^\circ = \tfrac{1}{2}$ , and then we can solve to get $d = \boxed{672}$ . $[asy] import olympiad; size(230pt); defaultpen(linewidth(0.8)+fontsize(10pt)); real r1 = 17, r2 = 27, d = 35, r = 18; pair O1 = origin, O2 = (d,0); path w1 = circle(origin,r1), w2 = circle((d,0),r2), w1p = circle(origin,r1+r), w2p = circle((d,0), r2 + r); pair[] X = intersectionpoints(w1,w2), Y = intersectionpoints(w1p,w2p); pair O = Y[1]; path w = circle(Y[1],r); pair Xp = 5 * X[1] - 4 * X[0]; pair[] P = intersectionpoints(Xp--X[0],w); label("$O_1$",origin,N); label("$O_2$",(d,0),N); label("$O$",Y[1],SW); draw(origin--Y[1]--(d,0)--cycle,gray(0.6)); pair T = foot(O,O1,O2), Tp = foot(O,X[0],X[1]); draw(Tp--O--T^^rightanglemark(O,T,O1,60)^^rightanglemark(O,Tp,X[0],60),gray(0.6)); draw(w^^w1^^w2^^P[0]--X[0]); dot(Y[1]^^origin^^(d,0)); label("$X$",T,N,gray(0.6)); label("$Y$",foot(X[0],O1,O2),NE,gray(0.6)); label("$\ell$",(O+Tp)/2,S,gray(0.6)); [/asy]$

Denote by $O_1$ and $O_2$ the centers of $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$ respectively. Set $X$ as the projection of $O$ onto $O_1O_2$ , and denote by $Y$ the intersection of $AB$ with $O_1O_2$ . Note that $\ell = XY$ . Now recall that $d(O_2Y-O_1Y) = O_2Y^2 - O_1Y^2 = R_2^2 - R_1^2.$ Furthermore, note that $\begin{align*}d(O_2X - O_1X) &= O_2X^2 - O_1X^2= O_2O^2 - O_1O^2 \\ &= (R_2 + r)^2 - (R_1+r)^2 = (R_2^2 - R_1^2) + 2r(R_2 - R_1).\end{align*}$ Substituting the first equality into the second one and subtracting yields $2r(R_2 - R_1) = d(O_2X - O_1X) - d(O_2Y - O_1Y) = 2dXY,$ which rearranges to the desired.

Solution 4 (Quick)

Suppose we label the points as shown below. $[asy] defaultpen(fontsize(12)+0.6); size(300); pen p=fontsize(10)+royalblue+0.4; var r=1200; pair O1=origin, O2=(672,0), O=OP(CR(O1,961+r),CR(O2,625+r)); path c1=CR(O1,961), c2=CR(O2,625), c=CR(O,r); pair A=IP(CR(O1,961),CR(O2,625)), B=OP(CR(O1,961),CR(O2,625)), P=IP(L(A,B,0,0.2),c), Q=IP(L(A,B,0,200),c), F=IP(CR(O,625+r),O--O1), M=(F+O2)/2, D=IP(CR(O,r),O--O1), E=IP(CR(O,r),O--O2), X=extension(E,D,O,O+O1-O2), Y=extension(D,E,O1,O2); draw(c1^^c2); draw(c,blue+0.6); draw(O1--O2--O--cycle,black+0.6); draw(O--X^^Y--O2,black+0.6); draw(X--Y,heavygreen+0.6); draw((X+O)/2--O,MidArrow); draw(O2--Y-(300,0),MidArrow); dot("$A$",A,dir(A-O2/2)); dot("$B$",B,dir(B-O2/2)); dot("$O_2$",O2,right+up); dot("$O_1$",O1,left+up); dot("$O$",O,dir(O-O2)); dot("$D$",D,dir(170)); dot("$E$",E,dir(E-O1)); dot("$X$",X,dir(X-D)); dot("$Y$",Y,dir(Y-D)); label("$R$",O--E,right+up,p); label("$R$",O--D,left+down,p); label("$2R$",(X+O)/2-(150,0),down,p); label("$961$",O1--D,2*(left+down),p); label("$625$",O2--E,2*(right+up),p); MA("",E,D,O1,100,fuchsia+linewidth(1)); MA("",X,D,O,100,fuchsia+linewidth(1)); MA("",Y,E,O2,100,orange+linewidth(1)); MA("",D,E,O,100,orange+linewidth(1)); [/asy]$ By radical axis, the tangents to $\omega$ at $D$ and $E$ intersect on $AB$ . Thus $PDQE$ is harmonic, so the tangents to $\omega$ at $P$ and $Q$ intersect at $X \in DE$ . Moreover, $OX \parallel O_1O_2$ because both $OX$ and $O_1O_2$ are perpendicular to $AB$ , and $OX = 2OP$ because $\angle POQ = 120^{\circ}$ . Thus $O_1O_2 = O_1Y - O_2Y = 2 \cdot 961 - 2\cdot 625 = \boxed{672}$ by similar triangles.

~mathman3880

Solution 5 (Official MAA)

Like in other solutions, let $O$ be the center of $\omega$ with $r$ its radius; also, let $O_{1}$ and $O_{2}$ be the centers of $\omega_{1}$ and $\omega_{2}$ with $R_{1}$ and $R_{2}$ their radii, respectively. Let line $OP$ intersect line $O_{1}O_{2}$ at $T$ , and let $u=TO_{2}$ , $v=TO_{1}$ , $x=PT$ , where the length $O_{1}O_{2}$ splits as $u+v$ . Because the lines $PQ$ and $O_{1}O_{2}$ are perpendicular, lines $OT$ and $O_{1}O_{2}$ meet at a $60^{\circ}$ angle.

Applying the Law of Cosines to $\triangle O_{2}PT$ , $\triangle O_{1}PT$ , $\triangle O_{2}OT$ , and $\triangle O_{1}OT$ gives $\begin{align*}\triangle O_{2}PT&:O_{2}P^{2}=u^{2}+x^{2}-ux \\ \triangle O_{1}PT&:O_{1}P^{2}=v^{2}+x^{2}+vx \\ \triangle O_{2}OT&:(r+R_{2})^{2}=u^{2}+(r+x)^{2}-u(r+x) \\ \triangle O_{1}OT&:(r+R_{1})^{2}=v^{2}+(r+x)^{2}+v(r+x)\end{align*}$

Adding the first and fourth equations, then subtracting the second and third equations gives us $\left(O_{2}P^{2}-O_{1}P^{2}\right)+\left(R_{1}^{2}-R_{2}^{2}\right)+2r(R_{1}-R_{2})=r(u+v)$

Since $P$ lies on the radical axis of $\omega_{1}$ and $\omega_{2}$ , the power of point $P$ with respect to either circle is $O_{2}P^{2}-R_{2}^{2}=O_{1}P^{2}-R_{1}^{2}.$

Hence $2r(R_{1}-R_{2})=r(u+v)$ which simplifies to $u+v=2(R_{1}-R_{2}).$

The requested distance $O_{1}O_{2}=O_{1}T+O_{2}T=u+v$ is therefore equal to $2\cdot(961-625)=\boxed{672}$ .

Solution 6 (Geometry)

Let circle $\omega$ tangent circles $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2,$ respectively at distinct points $C$ and $D$ . Let $O, O_1, O_2 (r, r_1, r_2)$ be the centers (the radii) of $\omega, \omega_1$ and $\omega_2,$ respectively. WLOG $r_1 < r_2.$ Let $F$ be the point of $OO_2$ such, that $OO_1 =OF.$ Let $M$ be the midpoint $FO_1, OE \perp AB, CT$ be the radical axes of $\omega_1$ and $\omega, T \in AB.$

Then $T$ is radical center of $\omega, \omega_1$ and $\omega_2, TD = CT.$

In $\triangle OFO_1 (OF = OO_1) OT$ is bisector of $\angle O, OM$ is median

$\hspace{10mm} \implies O,T,$ and $M$ are collinear.

$\angle OCT = \angle ODT = \angle OET = 90^\circ \implies$

$OCTDE$ is cyclic (in $\Omega), OT$ is diameter $\Omega.$ $O_1O_2 \perp AB, OM \perp FO_1 \implies \angle FO_1O_2 = \angle OTE$ $\angle OTE = \angle ODE$ as they intercept the same arc $\overset{\Large\frown}{OE}$ in $\Omega.$ $OE \perp AB, O_1O_2 \perp AB \implies O_1 O_2 || OE \implies$ $\angle OO_2O_1 = \angle O_2 OE \implies \triangle ODE \sim \triangle O_2 O_1 F \implies$ $\frac {OE}{OD} = \frac {O_2F}{O_1O_2} \implies \cos \frac {120^\circ}{2} = \frac{r_2 + r - r_1 -r} {O_1O_2}\implies {O_1O_2}= 2|r_2 – r_1|.$

Since $r_{1}=625$ and $r_{2}=961$ , the answer is $2\cdot|961-625|=\boxed{672}$ .

vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss

Solution 7

We are not given the radius of circle $w$ , but based on the problem statement, that radius isn't important. We can set $w$ to have radius infinity (solution 8), but if you didn't observe that, you could also set the radius to be $2r$ so that the line containing the center of $w$ , call it $W$ , and $w_2$ , call it $W_2$ , is perpendicular to the line containing the center of $w_1$ , call it $W_1$ and $w_2$ . Let $AB = 2h$ and $W_1W_2 = x$ . Also, let the projections of $W$ and $W_1$ onto line $AB$ be $X$ and $Y$ , respectively.

By Pythagorean Theorem on $\triangle WW_1W_2$ , we get $x^2+(625+2r)^2=(961+2r)^2 \;(1)$ Note that since $\angle PWQ = 120$ , $\angle PWX = 60$ . So, $WX = 2r/2 = r = W_1Y$ . We now get two more equations from Pythag: $h^2+r^2 = 625^2 \; (2)$ $h^2+(x-r)^2 = 961^2 \; (3)$ From subtracting $(2)$ and $(3)$ , $x^2-2rx=961^2-625^2 \; (4)$ . Rearranging $(1)$ yields $x^2-1344r = 961^2-625^2$ . Plugging in our result from $(4)$ , $x^2-1344r= x^2-2rx \implies 1344r = 2rx \implies x=\boxed{672}$ .

~sml1809

Solution 8 (Cheese)

Let the circle $\omega$ be infinitely big (a line). Then for it to be split into an arc of $120^{\circ}$ , $\overline{PQ}$ must intersect at a $60^{\circ}$ with line $\omega$ .

Notice the 30-60-90 triangle in the image. $O_1R = 961 - 625$ .

Thus, the distance between the centers of $\omega_1$ and $\omega_2$ is $2(961-625)=\boxed{672}$

picture by afly

Video Solution by MOP 2024

https://youtu.be/GQT73xqvtXA

~r00tsOfUnity

Video Solution

https://youtu.be/gN7Ocu3D62M

~Math Problem Solving Skills

Video Solution

Who wanted to see animated video solutions can see this. I found this really helpful.

https://youtu.be/YtZ8_7i833E

P.S: This video is not made by me. And solution is same like below solutions.

≈@rounak138

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Circles <math>\omega_1</math> and <math>\omega_2</math> with radii <math>961</math> and <math>625</math>, respectively, intersect at distinct points <math>A</math> and <math>B</math>. A third circle <math>\omega</math> is externally tangent to both <math>\omega_1</math> and <math>\omega_2</math>. Suppose line <math>AB</math> intersects <math>\omega</math> at two points <math>P</math> and <math>Q</math> such that the measure of minor arc <math>\widehat{PQ}</math> is <math>120^{\circ}</math>. Find the distance between the centers of <math>\omega_1</math> and <math>\omega_2</math>.
-==Solution 1 (Properties of Radical Axis)==
+==Quick, Olympiad-Style Solution==
+Let <math>D\equiv\omega\cap\omega_{1}</math> and <math>E\equiv\omega\cap\omega_{2}</math>. The solution relies on the following key claim:
+<font color=red><b>Claim.</b></font color> <math>DPEQ</math> is a harmonic quadrilateral.
+<font color=blue><b>Proof.</b></font color> Using the radical axis theorem, the tangents to circle <math>\omega</math> at <math>D</math> and <math>E</math> are concurrent with line <math>\overline{ABPQ}</math> at the radical center, implying that our claim is true by harmonic quadrilateral properties. <math>\blacksquare</math>
+Thus, we deduce the tangents to <math>\omega</math> at <math>P</math> and <math>Q</math> are concurrent at <math>F</math> with line <math>\overline{DE}</math>. Denote by <math>O_{1}, O_{2}, O</math> the centers of <math>\omega_{1}, \omega_{2}, \omega</math> respectively.
+Now suppose <math>G\equiv\overline{FDE}\cap\overline{O_{1}O_{2}}</math>. Note that <math>\overline{OF}\parallel\overline{O_{1}O_{2}}</math> giving us the pairs of similar triangles <cmath>\triangle O_{1}GD\sim\triangle OFD~\text{and}~\triangle O_{2}GE\sim\triangle OFE.</cmath> We thereby obtain <cmath>\dfrac{O_{1}G}{O_{1}D}=\dfrac{OF}{OD}=\dfrac{r\sec\tfrac{120^{\circ}}{2}}{r}=\sec 60^{\circ}=2</cmath> since <math>\widehat{PQ}=120^{\circ}</math>, where <math>r</math> denotes the radius of <math>\omega</math>, and <cmath>\dfrac{O_{2}G}{O_{2}E}=\dfrac{OF}{OE}=\sec 60^{\circ}=2</cmath> as well. It follows that <cmath>O_{1}O_{2}=O_{1}G-O_{2}G=2(O_{1}D-O_{2}E)=2(961-625)=\textbf{672}.</cmath>
+[[File:AIME 2021-I13 Geogebra Diagram.png|672px]]
+==Solution 1 (Radical Axis)==
 Let <math>O_i</math> and <math>r_i</math> be the center and radius of <math>\omega_i</math>, and let <math>O</math> and <math>r</math> be the center and radius of <math>\omega</math>.
@@ Line 51: / Line 65: @@
 &\qquad -OH^2 = O_2H^2 - (r+r_2)^2 = O_1H^2 - (r+r_1)^2 \\
 &\implies \left(d+r-\tfrac{r_1^2-r_2^2}{d}\right)^2 - 4(r+r_2)^2 = \left(d-r+\tfrac{r_1^2-r_2^2}{d}\right)^2 - 4(r+r_1)^2 \\
-&\implies 2dr - 2(r_1^2-r_2)^2-8rr_2-4r_2^2 = -2dr+2(r_1^2-r_2^2)-8rr_1-4r_1^2 \\
+&\implies 2dr - 2(r_1^2-r_2^2)-8rr_2-4r_2^2 = -2dr+2(r_1^2-r_2^2)-8rr_1-4r_1^2 \\
 &\implies 4dr = 8rr_2-8rr_1 \\
 &\implies d=2r_2-2r_1
@@ Line 58: / Line 72: @@
 ==Solution 2 (Linearity)==
-Let <math>O_{1}</math> and <math>O_{2}</math> be the centers of <math>\omega_{1}</math> and <math>\omega_{2}</math>, respectively, and let <math>O</math> be the center of <math>\omega</math>. Then, the distance from <math>O</math> to the radical axis <math>\ell\equiv\overline{AB}</math> of <math>\omega_{1}, \omega_{2}</math> is equal to <math>\frac{1}{2}r</math>. Let <math>x=O_{1}O_{2}</math> and <math>O^{\prime}</math> the orthogonal projection of <math>O</math> onto line <math>\ell</math>. Define the function <math>f:\mathbb{R}^{2}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}</math> by <cmath>f(X)=\text{Pow}_{\omega_{1}}(X)-\text{Pow}_{\omega_{2}}(X).</cmath> Then <cmath>\begin{align*} f(O_{1})=-961^{2}-(x-625)(x+625)&=-x^{2}+625^{2}-961^{2}, \\ f(O_{2})=(x-961)(x+961)-(-625^{2})&=x^{2}+625^{2}-961^{2}, \\ f(O)=r(r+2\cdot961)-r(r+2\cdot625)&=672r, \\ f(O^{\prime})&=0. \end{align*}</cmath> By [https://services.artofproblemsolving.com/download.php?id=YXR0YWNobWVudHMvMC84LzkzZjZjZmFlMGViY2E3MDMxNWQzY2IzNzFlZTk5NWFmOTM5ZGY1LnBkZg==&rn=TGluZWFyaXR5IG9mIFBvd2VyIG9mIGEgUG9pbnQucGRm Linearity of Power of a Point], <cmath>\frac{f(O_{2})-f(O_{1})}{f(O)-f(O^{\prime})}=\frac{O_{2}O_{1}}{OO^{\prime}}=\frac{x}{\tfrac{1}{2}r}=\frac{2x}{r}.</cmath> Notice that <math>f(O_{2})-f(O_{1})=2x^{2}</math> and <math>f(O)-f(O^{\prime})=672r</math>, thus <cmath>\begin{align*}\frac{2x^{2}}{672r}&=\frac{2x}{r} \\ 2\cdot x^{2}\cdot r&=2\cdot x\cdot 672\cdot r \\ x^{2}&=672\cdot x \\ x&=\boxed{672}\end{align*}</cmath> since <math>x</math> is nonzero.
+Let <math>O_{1}</math>, <math>O_{2}</math>, and <math>O</math> be the centers of <math>\omega_{1}</math>, <math>\omega_{2}</math>, and <math>\omega</math> with <math>r_{1}</math>, <math>r_{2}</math>, and <math>r</math> their radii, respectively. Then, the distance from <math>O</math> to the radical axis <math>\ell\equiv\overline{AB}</math> of <math>\omega_{1}, \omega_{2}</math> is equal to <math>\frac{1}{2}r</math>. Let <math>x=O_{1}O_{2}</math> and <math>O^{\prime}</math> the orthogonal projection of <math>O</math> onto line <math>\ell</math>. Define the function <math>f:\mathbb{R}^{2}\rightarrow\mathbb{R}</math> by <cmath>f(X)=\text{Pow}_{\omega_{1}}(X)-\text{Pow}_{\omega_{2}}(X).</cmath> Then <cmath>\begin{align*} f(O_{1})=-r_{1}^{2}-(x-r_{2})(x+r_{2})&=-x^{2}+r_{2}^{2}-r_{1}^{2}, \\ f(O_{2})=(x-r_{1})(x+r_{1})-(-r_{2}^{2})&=x^{2}+r_{2}^{2}-r_{1}^{2}, \\ f(O)=r(r+2r_{1})-r(r+2r_{2})&=2r(r_{1}-r_{2}), \\ f(O^{\prime})&=0. \end{align*}</cmath> By [https://services.artofproblemsolving.com/download.php?id=YXR0YWNobWVudHMvMC84LzkzZjZjZmFlMGViY2E3MDMxNWQzY2IzNzFlZTk5NWFmOTM5ZGY1LnBkZg==&rn=TGluZWFyaXR5IG9mIFBvd2VyIG9mIGEgUG9pbnQucGRm linearity], <cmath>\frac{f(O_{2})-f(O_{1})}{f(O)-f(O^{\prime})}=\frac{O_{1}O_{2}}{OO^{\prime}}=\frac{x}{\tfrac{1}{2}r}=\frac{2x}{r}.</cmath> Notice that <math>f(O_{2})-f(O_{1})=x^{2}-(-x^{2})=2x^{2}</math> and <math>f(O)-f(O^{\prime})=2r(r_{1}-r_{2})</math>, thus <cmath>\begin{align*}\frac{2x^{2}}{2r(r_{1}-r_{2})}&=\frac{2x}{r}\end{align*}</cmath> Dividing both sides by <math>\frac{2x}{r}</math> (which is obviously nonzero as <math>x</math> is nonzero) gives us <cmath>\begin{align*}\frac{x}{2(r_{1}-r_{2})}&=1\end{align*}</cmath> so <math>x=2(r_{1}-r_{2})</math>. Since <math>r_{1}=961</math> and <math>r_{2}=625</math>, the answer is <math>x=2\cdot(961-625)=\boxed{672}</math>.
 ==Solution 3==
@@ Line 90: / Line 104: @@
 ==Solution 4 (Quick)==
-Suppose we label the points as shown [https://services.artofproblemsolving.com/download.php?id=YXR0YWNobWVudHMvNC9mLzRiM2JjYThjYmZlY2ViZGI0ODhjYzE4YzMyMmM0M2QyOTZlMmU5LmpwZw==&rn=MTU4ODUxMDg3XzczMDI0ODE4MTAwNjA5N184NDQzMjQxMjM3MDQ2NzQ5NjM4X24uanBn here]. By radical axis, the tangents to <math>\omega</math> at <math>D</math> and <math>E</math> intersect on <math>AB</math>. Thus <math>PDQE</math> is harmonic, so the tangents to <math>\omega</math> at <math>P</math> and <math>Q</math> intersect at <math>X \in DE</math>. Moreover, <math>OX \parallel O_1O_2</math> because both <math>OX</math> and <math>O_1O_2</math> are perpendicular to <math>AB</math>, and <math>OX = 2OP</math> because <math>\angle POQ = 120^{\circ}</math>. Thus<cmath>O_1O_2 = O_1Y - O_2Y = 2 \cdot 961 - 2\cdot 625 = \boxed{672}</cmath>by similar triangles.
+Suppose we label the points as shown [https://services.artofproblemsolving.com/download.php?id=YXR0YWNobWVudHMvNC9mLzRiM2JjYThjYmZlY2ViZGI0ODhjYzE4YzMyMmM0M2QyOTZlMmU5LmpwZw==&rn=MTU4ODUxMDg3XzczMDI0ODE4MTAwNjA5N184NDQzMjQxMjM3MDQ2NzQ5NjM4X24uanBn below].
+<asy>
+defaultpen(fontsize(12)+0.6); size(300);
+pen p=fontsize(10)+royalblue+0.4;
+var r=1200;
+pair O1=origin, O2=(672,0), O=OP(CR(O1,961+r),CR(O2,625+r));
+path c1=CR(O1,961), c2=CR(O2,625), c=CR(O,r);
+pair
+A=IP(CR(O1,961),CR(O2,625)), B=OP(CR(O1,961),CR(O2,625)),
+P=IP(L(A,B,0,0.2),c),
+Q=IP(L(A,B,0,200),c),
+F=IP(CR(O,625+r),O--O1),
+M=(F+O2)/2,
+D=IP(CR(O,r),O--O1),
+E=IP(CR(O,r),O--O2),
+X=extension(E,D,O,O+O1-O2),
+Y=extension(D,E,O1,O2);
+draw(c1^^c2); draw(c,blue+0.6); draw(O1--O2--O--cycle,black+0.6); draw(O--X^^Y--O2,black+0.6); draw(X--Y,heavygreen+0.6);
+draw((X+O)/2--O,MidArrow); draw(O2--Y-(300,0),MidArrow);
+dot("$A$",A,dir(A-O2/2));
+dot("$B$",B,dir(B-O2/2));
+dot("$O_2$",O2,right+up);  dot("$O_1$",O1,left+up);
+dot("$O$",O,dir(O-O2));
+dot("$D$",D,dir(170));
+dot("$E$",E,dir(E-O1));
+dot("$X$",X,dir(X-D));
+dot("$Y$",Y,dir(Y-D));
+label("$R$",O--E,right+up,p);
+label("$R$",O--D,left+down,p);
+label("$2R$",(X+O)/2-(150,0),down,p);
+label("$961$",O1--D,2*(left+down),p);
+label("$625$",O2--E,2*(right+up),p);
+MA("",E,D,O1,100,fuchsia+linewidth(1));
+MA("",X,D,O,100,fuchsia+linewidth(1));
+MA("",Y,E,O2,100,orange+linewidth(1));
+MA("",D,E,O,100,orange+linewidth(1));
+</asy>
+By radical axis, the tangents to <math>\omega</math> at <math>D</math> and <math>E</math> intersect on <math>AB</math>. Thus <math>PDQE</math> is harmonic, so the tangents to <math>\omega</math> at <math>P</math> and <math>Q</math> intersect at <math>X \in DE</math>. Moreover, <math>OX \parallel O_1O_2</math> because both <math>OX</math> and <math>O_1O_2</math> are perpendicular to <math>AB</math>, and <math>OX = 2OP</math> because <math>\angle POQ = 120^{\circ}</math>. Thus<cmath>O_1O_2 = O_1Y - O_2Y = 2 \cdot 961 - 2\cdot 625 = \boxed{672}</cmath>by similar triangles.
 ~mathman3880
 ==Solution 5 (Official MAA)==
-Like in other solutions, let <math>O</math> be the center of <math>\omega</math> with <math>r</math> its radius; also, let <math>O_{1}</math> and <math>O_{2}</math> be the centers of <math>\omega_{1}</math> and <math>\omega_{2}</math> with <math>r_{1}</math> and <math>r_{2}</math> their radii, respectively. Let line <math>OP</math> intersect line <math>O_{1}O_{2}</math> at <math>T</math>, and let <math>u=TO_{2}</math>, <math>v=TO_{1}</math>, <math>x=PT</math> . Because the lines <math>PQ</math> and <math>O_{1}O_{2}</math> are perpendicular, lines <math>OT</math> and <math>O_{1}O_{2}</math> meet at a <math>60^{\circ}</math> angle. Applying the Law of Cosines four times: <cmath>\begin{align*}\triangle O_{2}PT&:O_{2}P^{2}=u^{2}+x^{2}-ux \\ \triangle O_{1}PT&:O_{1}P^{2}=v^{2}+x^{2}+vx \\ \triangle O_{2}OT&:(r+R_{2})^{2}=u^{2}+(r+x)^{2}-u(r+x) \\ \triangle O_{1}OT&:(r+R_{1})^{2}=v^{2}+(r+x)^{2}+v(r+x)\end{align*}</cmath>
+Like in other solutions, let <math>O</math> be the center of <math>\omega</math> with <math>r</math> its radius; also, let <math>O_{1}</math> and <math>O_{2}</math> be the centers of <math>\omega_{1}</math> and <math>\omega_{2}</math> with <math>R_{1}</math> and <math>R_{2}</math> their radii, respectively. Let line <math>OP</math> intersect line <math>O_{1}O_{2}</math> at <math>T</math>, and let <math>u=TO_{2}</math>, <math>v=TO_{1}</math>, <math>x=PT</math>, where the length <math>O_{1}O_{2}</math> splits as <math>u+v</math>. Because the lines <math>PQ</math> and <math>O_{1}O_{2}</math> are perpendicular, lines <math>OT</math> and <math>O_{1}O_{2}</math> meet at a <math>60^{\circ}</math> angle.
+Applying the Law of Cosines to <math>\triangle O_{2}PT</math>, <math>\triangle O_{1}PT</math>, <math>\triangle O_{2}OT</math>, and <math>\triangle O_{1}OT</math> gives <cmath>\begin{align*}\triangle O_{2}PT&:O_{2}P^{2}=u^{2}+x^{2}-ux \\ \triangle O_{1}PT&:O_{1}P^{2}=v^{2}+x^{2}+vx \\ \triangle O_{2}OT&:(r+R_{2})^{2}=u^{2}+(r+x)^{2}-u(r+x) \\ \triangle O_{1}OT&:(r+R_{1})^{2}=v^{2}+(r+x)^{2}+v(r+x)\end{align*}</cmath>
 Adding the first and fourth equations, then subtracting the second and third equations gives us <cmath>\left(O_{2}P^{2}-O_{1}P^{2}\right)+\left(R_{1}^{2}-R_{2}^{2}\right)+2r(R_{1}-R_{2})=r(u+v)</cmath>
@@ Line 113: / Line 171: @@
 In <math>\triangle OFO_1 (OF = OO_1) OT</math> is bisector of <math>\angle O, OM</math> is median
-<math>\hspace{10mm} \implies O,T,</math>  and <math>M</math> are colinear.
+<math>\hspace{10mm} \implies O,T,</math>  and <math>M</math> are collinear.
 <cmath>\angle OCT = \angle ODT = \angle OET = 90^\circ \implies</cmath>
-<math>OCTDE</math> is inscribed in <math>\Omega, OT</math> is diameter <math>\Omega.</math>
+<math>OCTDE</math> is cyclic (in <math>\Omega), OT</math> is diameter <math>\Omega.</math>
 <math>O_1O_2 \perp AB, OM \perp FO_1 \implies \angle FO_1O_2 = \angle OTE</math>
-<math>\angle OTE = \angle ODE</math> as they intersept the same arc  <math>\overline{OE}</math> in <math>\Omega.</math>
+<math>\angle OTE = \angle ODE</math> as they intercept the same arc  <math> \overset{\Large\frown}{OE}</math> in <math>\Omega.</math>
 <cmath>OE \perp AB, O_1O_2 \perp AB \implies O_1 O_2 || OE \implies</cmath>
 <cmath>\angle OO_2O_1 = \angle O_2 OE \implies \triangle ODE \sim \triangle O_2 O_1 F \implies</cmath>
-<cmath>\frac {OE}{OD} = \frac {O_2F}{O_1O_2} \implies \sin \frac {120^\circ}{2} = \frac{r_2 + r - r_1 -r} {O_1O_2}\implies {O_1O_2}= 2|r_2 – r_1|.</cmath>
+<cmath>\frac {OE}{OD} = \frac {O_2F}{O_1O_2} \implies \cos \frac {120^\circ}{2} = \frac{r_2 + r - r_1 -r} {O_1O_2}\implies {O_1O_2}= 2|r_2 – r_1|.</cmath>
+Since <math>r_{1}=625</math> and <math>r_{2}=961</math>, the answer is <math>2\cdot|961-625|=\boxed{672}</math>.
+'''vladimir.shelomovskii@gmail.com, vvsss'''
+==Solution 7==
+We are not given the radius of circle <math>w</math>, but based on the problem statement, that radius isn't important. We can set <math>w</math> to have radius infinity (solution 8), but if you didn't observe that, you could also set the radius to be <math>2r</math> so that the line containing the center of <math>w</math>, call it <math>W</math>, and <math>w_2</math>, call it <math>W_2</math>, is perpendicular to the line containing the center of <math>w_1</math>, call it <math>W_1</math> and <math>w_2</math>. Let <math>AB = 2h</math> and <math>W_1W_2 = x</math>. Also, let the projections of <math>W</math> and <math>W_1</math> onto line <math>AB</math> be <math>X</math> and <math>Y</math>, respectively.
+By [[Pythagorean Theorem]] on <math>\triangle WW_1W_2</math>, we get
+<cmath>x^2+(625+2r)^2=(961+2r)^2 \;(1)</cmath>
+Note that since <math>\angle PWQ = 120</math>, <math>\angle PWX = 60</math>. So, <math>WX = 2r/2 = r = W_1Y</math>. We now get two more equations from Pythag:
+<cmath>h^2+r^2 = 625^2 \; (2)</cmath>
+<cmath>h^2+(x-r)^2 = 961^2 \; (3)</cmath>
+From subtracting <math>(2)</math> and <math>(3)</math>, <math>x^2-2rx=961^2-625^2 \; (4)</math>. Rearranging <math>(1)</math> yields <math>x^2-1344r = 961^2-625^2</math>. Plugging in our result from <math>(4)</math>, <math>x^2-1344r= x^2-2rx \implies 1344r = 2rx \implies x=\boxed{672}</math>.
+~sml1809
+==Solution 8 (Cheese)==
+Let the [[circle]] <math>\omega</math> be infinitely big (a line). Then for it to be split into an [[arc]] of <math>120^{\circ}</math>, <math>\overline{PQ}</math> must intersect at a <math>60^{\circ}</math> with line <math>\omega</math>.
+Notice the 30-60-90 triangle in the image. <math>O_1R = 961 - 625</math>.
+Thus, the distance between the centers of <math>\omega_1</math> and <math>\omega_2</math> is <math>2(961-625)=\boxed{672}</math>
+[[File:Cheesed circle.png|thumb|800px]]
+picture by afly
+==Video Solution by MOP 2024==
+https://youtu.be/GQT73xqvtXA
-'''Shelomovskii, vvsss,  www.deoma-cmd.ru'''
+~r00tsOfUnity
 ==Video Solution==
-https://youtu.be/gN7Ocu3D62M  ~Math Problem Solving Skills
+https://youtu.be/gN7Ocu3D62M
+~Math Problem Solving Skills
 ==Video Solution==

2021 AIME I (Problems • Answer Key • Resources)
Preceded by Problem 12	Followed by Problem 14
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15
All AIME Problems and Solutions

Page

Toolbox

Search

Difference between revisions of "2021 AIME I Problems/Problem 13"

Latest revision as of 07:40, 4 February 2025

Contents

Problem

Quick, Olympiad-Style Solution

Solution 1 (Radical Axis)

Solution 2 (Linearity)

Solution 3

Solution 4 (Quick)

Solution 5 (Official MAA)

Solution 6 (Geometry)

Solution 7

Solution 8 (Cheese)

Video Solution by MOP 2024

Video Solution

Video Solution

See Also