Difference between revisions of "Advanced Gmaasology"

(The actual Advanced Gmaasology)
m (added deletion request)
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Editor's note ==
 +
''The following is based on a manuscript by the creator of An Introduction to Gmaasology and has been reproduced here. It was published in <math>1321</math>, if the date is correct. We apologize for any errors in transcript. What follows is the manuscript, beginning with the introduction.''
 
=Advanced Gmaasology=
 
=Advanced Gmaasology=
== Editor's note ==
 
The following is based on a manuscript by the creator of An Introduction to Gmaasology and has been reproduced here. It was published in <math>1321</math>, if the date is correct. We apologize for any errors in transcript. What follows is the manuscript, beginning with the introduction.
 
  
= The actual Advanced Gmaasology =
+
==Introduction: Why is this book needed?==
== Introduction: Why is this book needed? ==
+
 
Gmaasology is more popular then it has ever been before, but few properly know about it.
+
Gmaasology is more popular than it has ever been before, but few properly know about it. In fact, of the 'experts' who claim to know about it, the majority are, in fact, frauds. Gmaasological experts can be distinguished from the imitations by simple procedure of asking them just ''what'' they know about Gmaas. For instance, I would reply 'education about Gmaas'.
 +
{{delete|looks like spam from [[Gmaasology|this]]}}

Latest revision as of 16:04, 4 September 2024

Editor's note

The following is based on a manuscript by the creator of An Introduction to Gmaasology and has been reproduced here. It was published in $1321$, if the date is correct. We apologize for any errors in transcript. What follows is the manuscript, beginning with the introduction.

Advanced Gmaasology

Introduction: Why is this book needed?

Gmaasology is more popular than it has ever been before, but few properly know about it. In fact, of the 'experts' who claim to know about it, the majority are, in fact, frauds. Gmaasological experts can be distinguished from the imitations by simple procedure of asking them just what they know about Gmaas. For instance, I would reply 'education about Gmaas'.

This article has been proposed for deletion. The reason given is: looks like spam from this.

Sysops: Before deleting this article, please check the article discussion pages and history.