Difference between revisions of "2018 AMC 12A Problems/Problem 23"
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) (→Diagram) |
Mathmagicops (talk | contribs) m (→Solution 4 (Parallel Lines)) |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Diagram == | == Diagram == | ||
− | |||
<asy> | <asy> | ||
/* Made by MRENTHUSIASM */ | /* Made by MRENTHUSIASM */ | ||
− | size( | + | size(375); |
pair P, A, T, U, G, M, N; | pair P, A, T, U, G, M, N; | ||
Line 35: | Line 34: | ||
label("$56^\circ$",A,3*dir(180-56/2),fontsize(10)); | label("$56^\circ$",A,3*dir(180-56/2),fontsize(10)); | ||
Label L = Label("$10$", align=(0,0), position=MidPoint, filltype=Fill(3,0,white)); | Label L = Label("$10$", align=(0,0), position=MidPoint, filltype=Fill(3,0,white)); | ||
− | draw(P-(0, | + | draw(P-(0,1)--A-(0,1), L=L, arrow=Arrows(),bar=Bars(15)); |
add(pathticks(U--N, 2, .5, 4, 8, red)); | add(pathticks(U--N, 2, .5, 4, 8, red)); | ||
add(pathticks(N--G, 2, .5, 4, 8, red)); | add(pathticks(N--G, 2, .5, 4, 8, red)); | ||
Line 66: | Line 65: | ||
We rotate <math>\triangle PUM</math> by <math>180^\circ</math> about <math>M</math> to obtain <math>\triangle AU'M.</math> Let <math>H</math> be the intersection of <math>\overline{PA}</math> and <math>\overline{GU'},</math> as shown below. | We rotate <math>\triangle PUM</math> by <math>180^\circ</math> about <math>M</math> to obtain <math>\triangle AU'M.</math> Let <math>H</math> be the intersection of <math>\overline{PA}</math> and <math>\overline{GU'},</math> as shown below. | ||
− | + | <asy> | |
+ | /* Made by MRENTHUSIASM */ | ||
+ | size(375); | ||
+ | |||
+ | pair P, A, T, U, G, M, N, U1, H; | ||
+ | P = origin; | ||
+ | A = (10,0); | ||
+ | U = intersectionpoint(Circle(P,1),P--P+2*dir(36)); | ||
+ | G = intersectionpoint(Circle(A,1),A--A+2*dir(180-56)); | ||
+ | T = extension(P,U,A,G); | ||
+ | M = midpoint(P--A); | ||
+ | N = midpoint(U--G); | ||
+ | U1 = rotate(180,M)*U; | ||
+ | H = intersectionpoint(P--A,G--U1); | ||
+ | fill(U--P--M--cycle^^M--U1--A--cycle,yellow); | ||
+ | dot("$P$",P,1.5*SW,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$A$",A,1.5*SE,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$U$",U,1.5*(0,1),linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$G$",G,1.5*NE,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$T$",T,1.5*(0,1),linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$M$",M,1.5*S,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$N$",N,1.5*(0,1),linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$U'$",U1,1.5*S,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | dot("$H$",H,1.5*NW,linewidth(4)); | ||
+ | draw(P--A--T--cycle^^U--G^^M--N^^U--U1--A); | ||
+ | draw(G--U1,dashed); | ||
+ | label("$1$",midpoint(G--A),1.5*dir(30)); | ||
+ | label("$1$",midpoint(A--U1),1.5*dir(-30)); | ||
+ | label("$1$",midpoint(U--P),1.5*dir(150)); | ||
+ | label("$36^\circ$",P,5*dir(18),fontsize(8)); | ||
+ | label("$56^\circ$",A,2.5*dir(180-56/2),fontsize(8)); | ||
+ | label("$36^\circ$",A,2.5*dir(180+25),fontsize(8)); | ||
+ | Label L = Label("$10$", align=(0,0), position=MidPoint, filltype=Fill(3,0,white)); | ||
+ | draw(P-(0,1.5)--A-(0,1.5), L=L, arrow=Arrows(),bar=Bars(15)); | ||
+ | add(pathticks(U--N, 2, .5, 4, 8, red)); | ||
+ | add(pathticks(N--G, 2, .5, 4, 8, red)); | ||
+ | add(pathticks(U--M, 1, .5, 0, 8, red)); | ||
+ | add(pathticks(M--U1, 1, .5, 0, 8, red)); | ||
+ | </asy> | ||
Note that <math>\triangle GU'A</math> is an isosceles triangle with <math>GA=U'A=1,</math> so <math>\angle AGU'=\angle AU'G=\frac{180-\angle GAU'}{2}=44.</math> In <math>\triangle GHA,</math> it follows that <math>\angle GHA=180-\angle GAH-\angle AGH=80.</math> | Note that <math>\triangle GU'A</math> is an isosceles triangle with <math>GA=U'A=1,</math> so <math>\angle AGU'=\angle AU'G=\frac{180-\angle GAU'}{2}=44.</math> In <math>\triangle GHA,</math> it follows that <math>\angle GHA=180-\angle GAH-\angle AGH=80.</math> | ||
Line 99: | Line 136: | ||
~Solution by <math>BladeRunnerAUG</math> (Frank FYC) | ~Solution by <math>BladeRunnerAUG</math> (Frank FYC) | ||
− | ==Solution 4== | + | ==Solution 4 (Parallel Lines)== |
Let the mid-point of <math>\overline{AT}</math> be <math>B</math> and the mid-point of <math>\overline{GT}</math> be <math>C</math>. | Let the mid-point of <math>\overline{AT}</math> be <math>B</math> and the mid-point of <math>\overline{GT}</math> be <math>C</math>. | ||
Since <math>BC=CG-BG</math> and <math>CG=AB-\frac{1}{2}</math>, we can conclude that <math>BC=\frac{1}{2}</math>. | Since <math>BC=CG-BG</math> and <math>CG=AB-\frac{1}{2}</math>, we can conclude that <math>BC=\frac{1}{2}</math>. | ||
Similarly, we can conclude that <math>BM-CN=\frac{1}{2}</math>. Construct <math>\overline{ND}\parallel\overline{BC}</math> and intersects <math>\overline{BM}</math> at <math>D</math>, which gives <math>MD=DN=\frac{1}{2}</math>. | Similarly, we can conclude that <math>BM-CN=\frac{1}{2}</math>. Construct <math>\overline{ND}\parallel\overline{BC}</math> and intersects <math>\overline{BM}</math> at <math>D</math>, which gives <math>MD=DN=\frac{1}{2}</math>. | ||
− | Since <math>\angle{ABD}=\angle{BDN}</math>, <math>MD=DN</math>, we can find the value of <math>\angle{DMN}</math>, which is equal to <math>\frac{1}{2}\angle T=44^{\circ}</math>. Since <math>\overline{BM}\parallel\overline{PT}</math>, which means <math>\angle{DMN}+\angle{ | + | Since <math>\angle{ABD}=\angle{BDN}</math>, <math>MD=DN</math>, we can find the value of <math>\angle{DMN}</math>, which is equal to <math>\frac{1}{2}\angle T=44^{\circ}</math>. Since <math>\overline{BM}\parallel\overline{PT}</math>, which means <math>\angle{DMN}+\angle{NMP}+\angle{P}=180^{\circ}</math>, we can infer that <math>\angle{NMP}=100^{\circ}</math>. |
As we are required to give the acute angle formed, the final answer would be <math>80^{\circ}</math>, which is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E) } 80}</math>. | As we are required to give the acute angle formed, the final answer would be <math>80^{\circ}</math>, which is <math>\boxed{\textbf{(E) } 80}</math>. | ||
Line 113: | Line 150: | ||
To prove this, let <math>N(x)</math> be the midpoint of <math>U(x)G(x),</math> where <math>U(x)</math> and <math>G(x)</math> are the points on <math>PT</math> and <math>AT,</math> respectively, such that <math>PU = AG = x.</math> (The points given in this problem correspond to <math>x=1,</math> but the idea we're getting at is that <math>x</math> will ultimately not matter.) Since <math>U(x)</math> and <math>G(x)</math> vary linearly with <math>x,</math> the locus of all points <math>N(x)</math> must be a line. Notice that <math>N(0) = M,</math> so <math>M</math> lies on this line. Let <math>N(x_0)</math> be the intersection of this line with <math>PT</math> (we know that this line will intersect <math>PT</math> and not <math>AT</math> because <math>PT > AT</math>). Notice that <math>G(x_0) = T.</math> | To prove this, let <math>N(x)</math> be the midpoint of <math>U(x)G(x),</math> where <math>U(x)</math> and <math>G(x)</math> are the points on <math>PT</math> and <math>AT,</math> respectively, such that <math>PU = AG = x.</math> (The points given in this problem correspond to <math>x=1,</math> but the idea we're getting at is that <math>x</math> will ultimately not matter.) Since <math>U(x)</math> and <math>G(x)</math> vary linearly with <math>x,</math> the locus of all points <math>N(x)</math> must be a line. Notice that <math>N(0) = M,</math> so <math>M</math> lies on this line. Let <math>N(x_0)</math> be the intersection of this line with <math>PT</math> (we know that this line will intersect <math>PT</math> and not <math>AT</math> because <math>PT > AT</math>). Notice that <math>G(x_0) = T.</math> | ||
− | Let <math>AT = a, TP = b, | + | Let <math>AT = a, TP = b, PA = c.</math> Then <math>AG(x_0) = PU(x_0) = AT = a</math> and <math>PG(x_0) = PT = b.</math> Thus, <math>PN(x_0) = \frac{a+b}{2}.</math> By the Angle Bisector Theorem, <math>\frac{PX}{AX} = \frac{PT}{AT} = \frac{b}{a},</math> so <math>PX = \frac{bc}{a+b}.</math> Since <math>M</math> is the midpoint of <math>AP,</math> we also have <math>PM = \frac{c}{2}.</math> Notice that: |
<cmath>\frac{PM}{PX} = \frac{\frac{c}{2}}{\frac{bc}{a+b}} = \frac{a+b}{2b}</cmath> | <cmath>\frac{PM}{PX} = \frac{\frac{c}{2}}{\frac{bc}{a+b}} = \frac{a+b}{2b}</cmath> | ||
Line 141: | Line 178: | ||
== Solution 7 (Olympiad Nuke) == | == Solution 7 (Olympiad Nuke) == | ||
− | By https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h489748p2745891, we get that <math>MN</math> is parallel to the angle bisector of <math>\angle ATP.</math> Thus, < | + | By https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h489748p2745891, we get that <math>MN</math> is parallel to the angle bisector of <math>\angle ATP.</math> Thus, <cmath>\angle NMA = 180^\circ - 56^\circ - \frac{180^\circ - 56^\circ - 36^\circ}{2} = \boxed{\textbf{(E) } 80}.</cmath> |
+ | |||
+ | == Solution 8 (Vectors) == | ||
+ | |||
+ | The argument of the average of any two unit vectors is average of the arguments of the two vectors. Thereby, the acute angle formed is <cmath>\frac{36^\circ{} + 180^\circ{} - 56^\circ{}}{2} = \boxed{\textbf{(E) } 80}.</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~Professor-Mom (all credit for this amazing solution goes to V_Enhance) | ||
== Video Solution by Richard Rusczyk == | == Video Solution by Richard Rusczyk == |
Latest revision as of 23:53, 1 September 2024
Contents
- 1 Problem
- 2 Diagram
- 3 Solution 1 (Trigonometry)
- 4 Solution 2 (Rotation, Isosceles Triangle, Parallel Lines)
- 5 Solution 3 (Extending PN)
- 6 Solution 4 (Parallel Lines)
- 7 Solution 5 (Angle Bisectors)
- 8 Solution 6 (Overkill: Miquel Points)
- 9 Solution 7 (Olympiad Nuke)
- 10 Solution 8 (Vectors)
- 11 Video Solution by Richard Rusczyk
- 12 See Also
Problem
In and Points and lie on sides and respectively, so that Let and be the midpoints of segments and respectively. What is the degree measure of the acute angle formed by lines and
Diagram
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 1 (Trigonometry)
Let be the origin, and lie on the -axis.
We can find and
Then, we have and is the midpoint of and , or
Notice that the tangent of our desired points is the the absolute difference between the -coordinates of the two points divided by the absolute difference between the -coordinates of the two points.
This evaluates to Now, using sum to product identities, we have this equal to so the answer is
~lifeisgood03
Note: Though this solution is excellent, setting makes life a tad bit easier
~MathleteMA
Solution 2 (Rotation, Isosceles Triangle, Parallel Lines)
We will refer to the Diagram section. In this solution, all angle measures are in degrees.
We rotate by about to obtain Let be the intersection of and as shown below. Note that is an isosceles triangle with so In it follows that
Since we conclude that by SAS, from which and By the Converse of the Corresponding Angles Postulate, we deduce that
Finally, we have by the Corresponding Angles Postulate.
~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 3 (Extending PN)
Link , extend to so that . Then link and .
are the midpoints of and respectively
is the midsegment of
Notice that
As a result, , ,
Also,
As a result,
Therefore,
Since we are asked for the acute angle between the two lines, the answer to this problem is .
~Solution by (Frank FYC)
Solution 4 (Parallel Lines)
Let the mid-point of be and the mid-point of be . Since and , we can conclude that . Similarly, we can conclude that . Construct and intersects at , which gives . Since , , we can find the value of , which is equal to . Since , which means , we can infer that . As we are required to give the acute angle formed, the final answer would be , which is .
~Surefire2019
Solution 5 (Angle Bisectors)
Let the bisector of intersect at We have so We claim that is parallel to this angle bisector, meaning that the acute angle formed by and is meaning that the answer is .
To prove this, let be the midpoint of where and are the points on and respectively, such that (The points given in this problem correspond to but the idea we're getting at is that will ultimately not matter.) Since and vary linearly with the locus of all points must be a line. Notice that so lies on this line. Let be the intersection of this line with (we know that this line will intersect and not because ). Notice that
Let Then and Thus, By the Angle Bisector Theorem, so Since is the midpoint of we also have Notice that:
Since the line containing all points must be parallel to This concludes the proof.
The critical insight to finding this solution is that the length probably shouldn't matter because a length ratio of or (as in the problem) is exceedingly unlikely to generate nice angles. This realization then motivates the idea of looking at all points similar to which then leads to looking at the most convenient such point (in this case, the one that lies on ).
~sujaykazi
Shoutout to Richard Yi and Mark Kong for working with me to discover the necessary insights to this problem!
Solution 6 (Overkill: Miquel Points)
Note that , the midpoint of major arc on is the Miquel Point of (Because ). Then, since , this spiral similarity carries to . Thus, we have , so .
But, we have ; thus .
Then, as is the midpoint of the major arc, it lies on the perpendicular bisector of , so . Since we want the acute angle, we have , so the answer is .
~stronto
Sidenote
For another way to find , note that giving as desired.
Solution 7 (Olympiad Nuke)
By https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c6h489748p2745891, we get that is parallel to the angle bisector of Thus,
Solution 8 (Vectors)
The argument of the average of any two unit vectors is average of the arguments of the two vectors. Thereby, the acute angle formed is
~Professor-Mom (all credit for this amazing solution goes to V_Enhance)
Video Solution by Richard Rusczyk
https://artofproblemsolving.com/videos/amc/2018amc12a/473
~ dolphin7
See Also
2018 AMC 12A (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | |
Preceded by Problem 22 |
Followed by Problem 24 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 • 16 • 17 • 18 • 19 • 20 • 21 • 22 • 23 • 24 • 25 | |
All AMC 12 Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.