Difference between revisions of "1989 AIME Problems/Problem 8"
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) (→Solution 3 (Finite Differences by Arithmetic)) |
MRENTHUSIASM (talk | contribs) (→Solution 7 (Similar to Solutions 3 and 4)) |
||
(34 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Solution 1 (Quadratic Function) == | == Solution 1 (Quadratic Function) == | ||
− | Note that each equation is of the form <cmath>f(k)=k^2x_1+(k+1)^2x_2+(k+2)^2x_3+(k+3)^2x_4+(k+4)^2x_5+(k+5)^2x_6+(k+6)^2x_7 | + | Note that each given equation is of the form <cmath>f(k)=k^2x_1+(k+1)^2x_2+(k+2)^2x_3+(k+3)^2x_4+(k+4)^2x_5+(k+5)^2x_6+(k+6)^2x_7</cmath> for some <math>k\in\{1,2,3\}.</math> |
When we expand <math>f(k)</math> and combine like terms, we obtain a quadratic function of <math>k:</math> <cmath>f(k)=ak^2+bk+c,</cmath> where <math>a,b,</math> and <math>c</math> are linear combinations of <math>x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4,x_5,x_6,</math> and <math>x_7.</math> | When we expand <math>f(k)</math> and combine like terms, we obtain a quadratic function of <math>k:</math> <cmath>f(k)=ak^2+bk+c,</cmath> where <math>a,b,</math> and <math>c</math> are linear combinations of <math>x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4,x_5,x_6,</math> and <math>x_7.</math> | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Finally, the answer is <cmath>f(4)=16a+4b+c=\boxed{334}.</cmath> | Finally, the answer is <cmath>f(4)=16a+4b+c=\boxed{334}.</cmath> | ||
− | ~Azjps | + | ~Azjps ~MRENTHUSIASM |
− | |||
− | ~MRENTHUSIASM | ||
== Solution 2 (Linear Combination) == | == Solution 2 (Linear Combination) == | ||
Line 49: | Line 47: | ||
Finally, applying the Transitive Property to <math>(8)</math> and <math>(9)</math> gives <math>S-234=100,</math> from which <math>S=\boxed{334}.</math> | Finally, applying the Transitive Property to <math>(8)</math> and <math>(9)</math> gives <math>S-234=100,</math> from which <math>S=\boxed{334}.</math> | ||
− | ~Duohead | + | ~Duohead ~MRENTHUSIASM |
− | |||
− | ~MRENTHUSIASM | ||
== Solution 3 (Finite Differences by Arithmetic) == | == Solution 3 (Finite Differences by Arithmetic) == | ||
− | Note that the second differences of all quadratic sequences must be constant (but nonzero). | + | Note that the second differences of all quadratic sequences must be constant (but nonzero). One example is the following sequence of perfect squares: |
− | |||
− | One example | ||
<asy> | <asy> | ||
Line 63: | Line 57: | ||
for (real i=1; i<=10; ++i) { | for (real i=1; i<=10; ++i) { | ||
− | label("$"+string(i^2)+"$",(i-1,0)); | + | label("\boldmath{$"+string(i^2)+"$}",(i-1,0)); |
} | } | ||
Line 75: | Line 69: | ||
for (real i=1; i<=9; ++i) { | for (real i=1; i<=9; ++i) { | ||
− | draw((0. | + | draw((0.1+(i-1),-0.15)--(0.4+(i-1),-0.6),red); |
} | } | ||
for (real i=1; i<=8; ++i) { | for (real i=1; i<=8; ++i) { | ||
− | draw(( | + | draw((0.6+(i-1),-0.9)--(0.9+(i-1),-1.35),red); |
} | } | ||
for (real i=1; i<=9; ++i) { | for (real i=1; i<=9; ++i) { | ||
− | draw(( | + | draw((0.6+(i-1),-0.6)--(0.9+(i-1),-0.15),red); |
} | } | ||
for (real i=1; i<=8; ++i) { | for (real i=1; i<=8; ++i) { | ||
− | draw((0. | + | draw((0.1+i,-1.35)--(0.4+i,-0.9),red); |
} | } | ||
− | label("First Differences",(-0.75,-0.75),align=W); | + | label("\textbf{First Differences}",(-0.75,-0.75),align=W); |
− | label("Second Differences",(-0.75,-1.5),align=W); | + | label("\textbf{Second Differences}",(-0.75,-1.5),align=W); |
</asy> | </asy> | ||
Line 98: | Line 92: | ||
It follows that the second differences of <math>(1,12,123,S)</math> must be constant, as shown below: | It follows that the second differences of <math>(1,12,123,S)</math> must be constant, as shown below: | ||
− | < | + | <asy> |
+ | /* Made by MRENTHUSIASM */ | ||
+ | size(10cm); | ||
+ | |||
+ | label("\boldmath{$1$}",(0,0)); | ||
+ | label("\boldmath{$12$}",(1,0)); | ||
+ | label("\boldmath{$123$}",(2,0)); | ||
+ | label("\boldmath{$S$}",(3,0)); | ||
+ | |||
+ | label("$11$",(0.5,-0.75)); | ||
+ | label("$111$",(1.5,-0.75)); | ||
+ | label("$d_1$",(2.5,-0.75)); | ||
+ | |||
+ | label("$100$",(1,-1.5)); | ||
+ | label("$d_2$",(2,-1.5)); | ||
+ | |||
+ | for (real i=1; i<=3; ++i) { | ||
+ | draw((0.1+(i-1),-0.15)--(0.4+(i-1),-0.6),red); | ||
+ | } | ||
− | + | for (real i=1; i<=2; ++i) { | |
+ | draw((0.6+(i-1),-0.9)--(0.9+(i-1),-1.35),red); | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | for (real i=1; i<=3; ++i) { | ||
+ | draw((0.6+(i-1),-0.6)--(0.9+(i-1),-0.15),red); | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | for (real i=1; i<=2; ++i) { | ||
+ | draw((0.1+i,-1.35)--(0.4+i,-0.9),red); | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | label("\textbf{First Differences}",(-0.75,-0.75),align=W); | ||
+ | label("\textbf{Second Differences}",(-0.75,-1.5),align=W); | ||
+ | </asy> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Finally, we have <math>d_2=100,</math> from which | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align*} | ||
+ | S&=123+d_1 \\ | ||
+ | &=123+(111+d_2) \\ | ||
+ | &=\boxed{334}. | ||
+ | \end{align*}</cmath> | ||
~MRENTHUSIASM | ~MRENTHUSIASM | ||
Line 120: | Line 152: | ||
Alternatively, applying finite differences, one obtains <cmath>c_4 = {3 \choose 2}f(2) - {3 \choose 1}f(1) + {3 \choose 0}f(0) =334.</cmath> | Alternatively, applying finite differences, one obtains <cmath>c_4 = {3 \choose 2}f(2) - {3 \choose 1}f(1) + {3 \choose 0}f(0) =334.</cmath> | ||
− | ==Solution 5 ( | + | == Solution 5 (Assumption) == |
+ | The idea is to multiply the first, second and third equations by <math>a,b,</math> and <math>c,</math> respectively. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can only consider the coefficients of <math>x_1,x_2,</math> and <math>x_3:</math> | ||
+ | <cmath>\begin{align} | ||
+ | a+4b+9c&=16, \\ | ||
+ | 4a+9b+16c&=25, \\ | ||
+ | 9a+16b+25c&=36. | ||
+ | \end{align}</cmath> | ||
+ | Subtracting <math>(1)</math> from <math>(2),</math> we get <cmath>3a+5b+7c=9. \hspace{15mm}(4)</cmath> | ||
+ | Subtracting <math>3\cdot(4)</math> from <math>(3),</math> we get <cmath>b+4c=9. \hspace{25.5mm}(5)</cmath> | ||
+ | Subtracting <math>(1)</math> from <math>4\cdot(5),</math> we get <cmath>7c-a=20. \hspace{23mm}(6)</cmath> | ||
+ | From <math>(5)</math> and <math>(6),</math> we have <math>(a,b,c)=(7c-20,9-4c,c).</math> Substituting this into <math>(2)</math> gives <math>(a,b,c)=(1,-3,3).</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore, the answer is <math>1\cdot1+12\cdot(-3) + 123\cdot3 = \boxed{334}.</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 6 (Assumption)== | ||
We let <math>(x_4,x_5,x_6,x_7)=(0,0,0,0)</math>. Thus, we have | We let <math>(x_4,x_5,x_6,x_7)=(0,0,0,0)</math>. Thus, we have | ||
− | <cmath>\begin{ | + | <cmath>\begin{align*} |
− | x_1+4x_2+9x_3&=1\\ | + | x_1+4x_2+9x_3&=1,\\ |
− | 4x_1+9x_2+16x_3&=12\\ | + | 4x_1+9x_2+16x_3&=12,\\ |
− | 9x_1+16x_2+25x_3&=123\\ | + | 9x_1+16x_2+25x_3&=123.\\ |
− | \end{ | + | \end{align*}</cmath> |
Grinding this out, we have <math>(x_1,x_2,x_3)=\left(\frac{797}{4},-229,\frac{319}{4}\right)</math> which gives <math>\boxed{334}</math> as our final answer. | Grinding this out, we have <math>(x_1,x_2,x_3)=\left(\frac{797}{4},-229,\frac{319}{4}\right)</math> which gives <math>\boxed{334}</math> as our final answer. | ||
− | - | + | ~Pleaseletmewin |
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution 7 (Similar to Solutions 3 and 4)== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>s_n = n^2</math> be the sequence of perfect squares. | ||
+ | By either expanding or via finite differences, one can prove the miraculous recursion | ||
+ | <cmath>s_n = 3s_{n-1} - 3s_{n-2} + s_{n-3}.</cmath> | ||
+ | Hence, the answer is simply | ||
+ | <cmath>3 \cdot 123 - 3 \cdot 12 + 1 = \boxed{334}.</cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | I first saw this in a Mathologer video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AuV93LOPcE | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~Ritwin | ||
==Video Solution== | ==Video Solution== |
Latest revision as of 03:15, 20 November 2023
Contents
Problem
Assume that are real numbers such that Find the value of .
Solution 1 (Quadratic Function)
Note that each given equation is of the form for some
When we expand and combine like terms, we obtain a quadratic function of where and are linear combinations of and
We are given that and we wish to find
We eliminate by subtracting the first equation from the second, then subtracting the second equation from the third: By either substitution or elimination, we get and Substituting these back produces
Finally, the answer is
~Azjps ~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 2 (Linear Combination)
For simplicity purposes, we number the given equations and in that order. Let Subtracting from subtracting from and subtracting from we obtain the following equations, respectively: Subtracting from and subtracting from we obtain the following equations, respectively: Finally, applying the Transitive Property to and gives from which
~Duohead ~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 3 (Finite Differences by Arithmetic)
Note that the second differences of all quadratic sequences must be constant (but nonzero). One example is the following sequence of perfect squares:
Label equations and as Solution 2 does. Since the coefficients of or respectively, all form quadratic sequences with second differences we conclude that the second differences of equations must be constant.
It follows that the second differences of must be constant, as shown below:
Finally, we have from which ~MRENTHUSIASM
Solution 4 (Finite Differences by Algebra)
Notice that we may rewrite the equations in the more compact form as: where and is what we are trying to find.
Now consider the polynomial given by (we are only treating the as coefficients).
Notice that is in fact a quadratic. We are given and are asked to find . Using the concept of finite differences (a prototype of differentiation) we find that the second differences of consecutive values is constant, so that by arithmetic operations we find .
Alternatively, applying finite differences, one obtains
Solution 5 (Assumption)
The idea is to multiply the first, second and third equations by and respectively.
We can only consider the coefficients of and Subtracting from we get Subtracting from we get Subtracting from we get From and we have Substituting this into gives
Therefore, the answer is
Solution 6 (Assumption)
We let . Thus, we have Grinding this out, we have which gives as our final answer.
~Pleaseletmewin
Solution 7 (Similar to Solutions 3 and 4)
Let be the sequence of perfect squares. By either expanding or via finite differences, one can prove the miraculous recursion Hence, the answer is simply
I first saw this in a Mathologer video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AuV93LOPcE
~Ritwin
Video Solution
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mOROTEkvWI ~ MathEx
See also
1989 AIME (Problems • Answer Key • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 7 |
Followed by Problem 9 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 • 10 • 11 • 12 • 13 • 14 • 15 | ||
All AIME Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.