Difference between revisions of "1994 IMO Problems/Problem 1"
(Created page with "Let <math>a_1, a_2, \dots a_m</math> satisfy the given conditions. We will prove that for all <math>j, 1 \le j \le m,</math> <cmath>a_j+a_{m-j+1} \ge n+1</cmath> WLOG, let <...") |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | Let <math> m</math> and <math> n</math> be two positive integers. Let <math> a_1</math>, <math> a_2</math>, <math> \ldots</math>, <math> a_m</math> be <math> m</math> different numbers from the set <math> \{1, 2,\ldots, n\}</math> such that for any two indices <math> i</math> and <math> j</math> with <math> 1\leq i \leq j \leq m</math> and <math> a_i + a_j \leq n</math>, there exists an index <math> k</math> such that <math> a_i + a_j = a_k</math>. Show that | ||
+ | <cmath>\frac{a_1+a_2+...+a_m}{m} \ge \frac{n+1}{2}</cmath>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution== | ||
Let <math>a_1, a_2, \dots a_m</math> satisfy the given conditions. We will prove that for all <math>j, 1 \le j \le m,</math> | Let <math>a_1, a_2, \dots a_m</math> satisfy the given conditions. We will prove that for all <math>j, 1 \le j \le m,</math> | ||
Line 19: | Line 23: | ||
which rearranges to | which rearranges to | ||
<cmath> \frac{a_1+a_2+ \dots a_m}{m} \ge \frac{n+1}{2} </cmath> | <cmath> \frac{a_1+a_2+ \dots a_m}{m} \ge \frac{n+1}{2} </cmath> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==See Also== | ||
+ | {{IMO box|year=1994|before=First Question|num-a=2}} |
Latest revision as of 00:28, 22 November 2023
Let and be two positive integers. Let , , , be different numbers from the set such that for any two indices and with and , there exists an index such that . Show that .
Solution
Let satisfy the given conditions. We will prove that for all
WLOG, let . Assume that for some
This implies, for each because
For each of these values of i, we must have such that is a member of the sequence for each . Because . Combining all of our conditions we have that each of must be distinct integers such that
However, there are distinct , but only integers satisfying the above inequality, so we have a contradiction. Our assumption that was false, so for all such that Summing these inequalities together for gives which rearranges to
See Also
1994 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by First Question |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 2 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |