Difference between revisions of "2005 IMO Problems/Problem 2"
(Created page with "Let <math>a_1, a_2, \dots</math> be a sequence of integers with infinitely many positive and negative terms. Suppose that for every positive integer <math>n</math> the numbers...") |
m (→Solution) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | ==Problem== | ||
+ | |||
Let <math>a_1, a_2, \dots</math> be a sequence of integers with infinitely many positive and negative terms. Suppose that for every positive integer <math>n</math> the numbers <math>a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n</math> leave <math>n</math> different remainders upon division by <math>n</math>. Prove that every integer occurs exactly once in the sequence. | Let <math>a_1, a_2, \dots</math> be a sequence of integers with infinitely many positive and negative terms. Suppose that for every positive integer <math>n</math> the numbers <math>a_1, a_2, \dots, a_n</math> leave <math>n</math> different remainders upon division by <math>n</math>. Prove that every integer occurs exactly once in the sequence. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Solution== | ||
+ | <math>{a_n}</math> satisfies the conditions if and only if <math>{a_n-a_1}</math> does. | ||
+ | Therefore we can assume that <math>a_1=0</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | First of all, <math>|a_n|<n</math> | ||
+ | Otherwise, <math>a_n = 0</math> mod <math>a_{a_n}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Claim: <math>a_{k+1}</math> is either the smallest positive number not in <math>{a_1, a_2, ..., a_k}</math> or the largest negative number not in this set. | ||
+ | *Proof by induction: the induction hypothesis implies that <math>a_1, a_2, ..., a_k</math> are consecutive. Let m and M be the smallest and largest numbers in this consecutive set, respectively. It is clear that <math>a_{k+1}=m-1=M+1</math> mod <math>k+1</math>. But since <math>|a_n|<n</math>, <math>a_{k+1}=m-1</math> or <math>M+1</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | This proves that if <math>{a_n}</math> contains an infinite number of positive and negative numbers, it must contain each integer exactly once. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ~Kscv | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==See Also== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{IMO box|year=2005|num-b=1|num-a=3}} |
Latest revision as of 08:07, 19 November 2023
Problem
Let be a sequence of integers with infinitely many positive and negative terms. Suppose that for every positive integer the numbers leave different remainders upon division by . Prove that every integer occurs exactly once in the sequence.
Solution
satisfies the conditions if and only if does. Therefore we can assume that
First of all, Otherwise, mod
Claim: is either the smallest positive number not in or the largest negative number not in this set.
- Proof by induction: the induction hypothesis implies that are consecutive. Let m and M be the smallest and largest numbers in this consecutive set, respectively. It is clear that mod . But since , or
This proves that if contains an infinite number of positive and negative numbers, it must contain each integer exactly once.
~Kscv
See Also
2005 IMO (Problems) • Resources | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | Followed by Problem 3 |
All IMO Problems and Solutions |