Difference between revisions of "1975 Canadian MO Problems/Problem 2"
(→Solution) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
== Solution == | == Solution == | ||
− | + | I claim <math>a_n=\frac{1}{(n)(n+1)}</math> with a proof by induction. First we can use partial fraction decomposition to rewrite <math>\frac{1}{(n)(n+1)}</math> as <math>\frac{A}{n}+\frac{B}{n+1}</math>. We have <cmath>\frac{An+A+Bn}{(n)(n+1)}=\frac{1}{(n)(n+1)}.</cmath> We can set coefficients equal, <math>A+B=0</math> and <math>A=1</math>. Now, <cmath>\frac{1}{(n)(n+1)}=\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+1}.</cmath> | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Base Case:''' If <math>n=1</math>, then <math>\frac{1}{(1)(1+1)}=\frac{1}{2}.</math> So, <math>a_n=\frac{1}{(n)(n+1)}</math> when <math>n=1</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Inductive Step:''' Suppose conclusion is true for <math>n=k</math>, such that we have <math>a_k=\frac{1}{k}-\frac{1}{k+1}.</math> We also have <math>a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_k=k^2a_k.</math> Add <math>a_{k+1}</math> to both sides. The left side becomes <math>\frac{1}{1}-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{3}+\cdots+\frac{1}{k}-\frac{1}{k+1}+a_{k+1}</math> which is a telescoping series equal to <math>1-\frac{1}{k+1}+a_{k+1}=\frac{k}{k+1}+a_{k+1}</math>. Now, we have <cmath>a_1+a_2+\cdots+a_k+a_{k+1}=\frac{k}{k+1}+a_{k+1}=(k+1)^2a_{k+1}.</cmath> We have <cmath>\frac{k}{k+1}+a_{k+1}=(k+1)^2a_{k+1}\implies \frac{k}{k+1}=(k^2+2k+1-1)(a_{k+1}) \implies \left(\frac{k}{k+1}\right)\left(\frac{1}{(k)(k+2)}\right)=a_{k+1} \implies a_{k+1}=\frac{1}{(k+1)(k+2)},</cmath> thus the conclusion being true for <math>n=k</math>, implies that it holds for <math>n=k+1</math>, so our induction is complete.<math>\blacksquare</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
{{Old CanadaMO box|num-b=1|num-a=3|year=1975}} | {{Old CanadaMO box|num-b=1|num-a=3|year=1975}} |
Latest revision as of 16:42, 20 June 2018
Problem 2
A sequence of numbers satisfies
(i)
(ii)
Determine the value of
Solution
I claim with a proof by induction. First we can use partial fraction decomposition to rewrite as . We have We can set coefficients equal, and . Now,
Base Case: If , then So, when .
Inductive Step: Suppose conclusion is true for , such that we have We also have Add to both sides. The left side becomes which is a telescoping series equal to . Now, we have We have thus the conclusion being true for , implies that it holds for , so our induction is complete.
1975 Canadian MO (Problems) | ||
Preceded by Problem 1 |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • | Followed by Problem 3 |