Difference between revisions of "2016 JBMO Problems/Problem 3"
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
<math>xy(x+y) + 4 = 2 \cdot 2016^n</math> | <math>xy(x+y) + 4 = 2 \cdot 2016^n</math> | ||
− | <math>2016 = 2^5 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 7</math> | + | <math>2016 = 2^5 \cdot 3^2 \cdot 7</math> is the unique prime factorization. |
Using module arithmetic, it can be proved that there is no solution. | Using module arithmetic, it can be proved that there is no solution. | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
In general, it is impossible to find integer values for <math>x,y</math> to satisfy the last statement. | In general, it is impossible to find integer values for <math>x,y</math> to satisfy the last statement. | ||
− | One way to show this is by checking all 27 cases modulo 9. An other one is the following: | + | One way to show this is by checking all 27 possible cases modulo 9. An other one is the following: |
<math>xy(x+y) + 4 = 0 \equiv (\mod 3)</math> | <math>xy(x+y) + 4 = 0 \equiv (\mod 3)</math> | ||
Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
'''Method 2:''' Using modulo 7 | '''Method 2:''' Using modulo 7 | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>xy(x+y) + 4 = 0 \equiv (\mod 7)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>xy(x+y) = 3 \equiv (\mod 7)</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | In general, it is impossible to find integer values for <math>x,y</math> to satisfy the last statement. | ||
+ | |||
+ | One way to show this is by checking all 15 possible cases modulo 7. | ||
== See also == | == See also == |
Revision as of 01:39, 23 April 2018
Problem
Find all triplets of integers such that the number
is a power of .
(A power of is an integer of form ,where is a non-negative integer.)
Solution
It is given that
Let and then and
We can then distinguish between two cases:
Case 1: If
and all cyclic permutations, with
Case 2: If
is the unique prime factorization.
Using module arithmetic, it can be proved that there is no solution.
Method 1: Using modulo 9
In general, it is impossible to find integer values for to satisfy the last statement.
One way to show this is by checking all 27 possible cases modulo 9. An other one is the following:
and
which is absurd since .
Method 2: Using modulo 7
In general, it is impossible to find integer values for to satisfy the last statement.
One way to show this is by checking all 15 possible cases modulo 7.
See also
2016 JBMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 2 |
Followed by Problem 4 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 | ||
All JBMO Problems and Solutions |