Art of Problem Solving
AoPS Online
Math texts, online classes, and more
for students in grades 5-12.
Visit AoPS Online ‚
Books for Grades 5-12 Online Courses
Beast Academy
Engaging math books and online learning
for students ages 6-13.
Visit Beast Academy ‚
Books for Ages 6-13 Beast Academy Online
AoPS Academy
Small live classes for advanced math
and language arts learners in grades 2-12.
Visit AoPS Academy ‚
Find a Physical Campus Visit the Virtual Campus

Difference between revisions of "1959 IMO Problems/Problem 1"

m (→‎Alternate)
(→‎First Solution)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
  
−
For this fraction to be reducible there must be a number <math>x</math> such that <math>x*(14n+3) = (21n+4)</math>, and a <math>1/x</math> such that <math>1/x*(21n+4) = (14n+3)</math>. Since <math>x</math> can only be one number (<math>x</math> is a linear term) we only have to evaluate x for one of these equations. Using the first one, <math>x</math> would have to equal <math>3/2</math>. However, <math>3*3/2</math> results in <math>9/2</math>, and is not equal to our desired <math>4</math>. Since there is no <math>x</math> to make the numerator and denominator equal, we can conclude the fraction is irreducible
+
For this fraction to be reducible there must be a number <math>x</math> such that <math>x \cdot (14n+3) = (21n+4)</math>, and a <math>1/x</math> such that <math>1/x \cdot (21n+4) = (14n+3)</math>. Since <math>x</math> can only be one number (<math>x</math> is a linear term) we only have to evaluate <math>x</math> for one of these equations. Using the first one, <math>x</math> would have to equal <math>3/2</math>. However, <math>3*3/2</math> results in <math>9/2</math>, and is not equal to our desired <math>4</math>. Since there is no <math>x</math> to make the numerator and denominator equal, we can conclude the fraction is irreducible.
 +
 
 +
EDIT: It appears to me that this solution is incorrect because it assumes that if <math>ax + b = cx + d</math>, then <math>a = c</math> and <math>b = d</math> -- the problem says irreducible for ALL <math>n</math>. If you agree, please remove this solution. 12/17/2017
  
 
=== Second Solution ===
 
=== Second Solution ===

Revision as of 14:44, 17 December 2017

Problem

Prove that the fraction $\frac{21n+4}{14n+3}$ is irreducible for every natural number $n$.


Solutions

First Solution

For this fraction to be reducible there must be a number $x$ such that $x \cdot (14n+3) = (21n+4)$, and a $1/x$ such that $1/x \cdot (21n+4) = (14n+3)$. Since $x$ can only be one number ($x$ is a linear term) we only have to evaluate $x$ for one of these equations. Using the first one, $x$ would have to equal $3/2$. However, $3*3/2$ results in $9/2$, and is not equal to our desired $4$. Since there is no $x$ to make the numerator and denominator equal, we can conclude the fraction is irreducible.

EDIT: It appears to me that this solution is incorrect because it assumes that if $ax + b = cx + d$, then $a = c$ and $b = d$ -- the problem says irreducible for ALL $n$. If you agree, please remove this solution. 12/17/2017

Second Solution

Denoting the greatest common divisor of $a, b$ as $(a,b)$, we use the Euclidean algorithm as follows:

$( 21n+4, 14n+3 ) = ( 7n+1, 14n+3 ) = ( 7n+1, 1 ) = 1$

As in the first solution, it follows that $\frac{21n+4}{14n+3}$ is irreducible. Q.E.D.

Third Solution

Proof by contradiction:

Assume that $\dfrac{14n+3}{21n+4}$ is a reducible fraction where $p$ is a divisor of both the numerator and the denominator:

$14n+3\equiv 0\pmod{p} \implies 42n+9\equiv 0\pmod{p}$

$21n+4\equiv 0\pmod{p} \implies 42n+8\equiv 0\pmod{p}$

Subtracting the second equation from the first equation we get $1\equiv 0\pmod{p}$ which is clearly absurd.

Hence $\frac{21n+4}{14n+3}$ is irreducible. Q.E.D.


Fourth Solution

We notice that:

$\frac{21n+4}{14n+3} = \frac{(14n+3)+(7n+1)}{14n+3} = 1+\frac{7n+1}{14n+3}$

So it follows that $7n+1$ and $14n+3$ must be coprime for every natural number $n$ for the fraction to be irreducible. Now the problem simplifies to proving $\frac{7n+1}{14n+3}$ irreducible. We re-write this fraction as:

$\frac{7n+1}{(7n+1)+(7n+1) + 1} = \frac{7n+1}{2(7n+1)+1}$

Since the denominator $2(7n+1) + 1$ differs from a multiple of the numerator $7n+1$ by 1, the numerator and the denominator must be relatively prime natural numbers. Hence it follows that $\frac{21n+4}{14n+3}$ is irreducible.

Q.E.D

Alternate solutions are always welcome. If you have a different, elegant solution to this problem, please add it to this page.

See Also

1959 IMO (Problems) • Resources
Preceded by
First question 		1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 Followed by
Problem 2
All IMO Problems and Solutions
Retrieved from "https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php?title=1959_IMO_Problems/Problem_1&oldid=88951"