Difference between revisions of "Talk:Partition"
m (Talk:Partitions moved to Talk:Partition) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
A couple of sample problems and solutions (of increasing difficulty) would add a lot of clarity and value to this article.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 12:44, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | A couple of sample problems and solutions (of increasing difficulty) would add a lot of clarity and value to this article.--[[User:MCrawford|MCrawford]] 12:44, 26 June 2006 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | InscrutableRoot, your edit made no sense. I reverted it. --[[User:Joml88|Joe]] 17:26, 3 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:29, 30 July 2006
I don't understand the sentence "However, this formula is rather unwieldy: it is not even known for which values of n is the number of partitions of n even, despite the presence of a formula!"
That is to say that the formula is so hard to work with that it can't even be used to tell when there are an even number of partitions. --ComplexZeta 10:46, 22 June 2006 (EDT)
A couple of sample problems and solutions (of increasing difficulty) would add a lot of clarity and value to this article.--MCrawford 12:44, 26 June 2006 (EDT)
InscrutableRoot, your edit made no sense. I reverted it. --Joe 17:26, 3 July 2006 (EDT)
