Difference between revisions of "1992 USAMO Problems/Problem 3"
(solution) |
m (→Resources) |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | ==Problem== | + | == Problem == |
− | |||
− | + | For a nonempty set <math>S</math> of integers, let <math>\sigma(S)</math> be the sum of the elements of <math>S</math>. Suppose that <math>A = \{a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_{11}\}</math> is a set of positive integers with <math>a_1 < a_2 < \cdots < a_{11}</math> and that, for each positive integer <math>n \le 1500</math>, there is a subset <math>S</math> of <math>A</math> for which <math>\sigma(S) = n</math>. What is the smallest possible value of <math>a_{10}</math>? | |
− | |||
− | <math>\mathbb{ | + | == Solution == |
+ | |||
+ | Let's a <math>n</math>-<math>p</math> set be a set <math>Z</math> such that <math>Z=\{a_1,a_2,\cdots,a_n\}</math>, where <math>\forall i<n</math>, <math>i\in \mathbb{Z}^+</math>, <math>a_i<a_{i+1}</math>, and for each <math>x\le p</math>, <math>x\in \mathbb{Z}^+</math>, <math>\exists Y\subseteq Z</math>, <math>\sigma(Y)=x</math>, <math>\nexists \sigma(Y)=p+1</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | (For Example <math>\{1,2\}</math> is a <math>2</math>-<math>3</math> set and <math>\{1,2,4,10\}</math> is a <math>4</math>-<math>8</math> set) | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Furthermore, let call a <math>n</math>-<math>p</math> set a <math>n</math>-<math>p</math> good set if <math>a_n\le p</math>, and a <math>n</math>-<math>p</math> bad set if <math>a_n\ge p+1</math> (note that <math>\nexists \sigma(Y)=p+1</math> for any <math>n</math>-<math>p</math> set. Thus, we can ignore the case where <math>a_n=p+1</math>). | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Furthermore, if you add any amount of elements to the end of a <math>n</math>-<math>p</math> bad set to form another <math>n</math>-<math>p</math> set (with a different <math>n</math>), it will stay as a <math>n</math>-<math>p</math> bad set because <math>a_{n+x}>a_{n}>p+1</math> for any positive integer <math>x</math> and <math>\nexists \sigma(Y)=p+1</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <b>Lemma</b>) If <math>Z</math> is a <math>n</math>-<math>p</math> set, <math>p\leq 2^n-1</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | For <math>n=1</math>, <math>p=0</math> or <math>1</math> because <math>a_1=1 \rightarrow p=1</math> and <math>a_1\ne1\rightarrow p=0</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Assume that the lemma is true for some <math>n</math>, then <math>2^n</math> is not expressible with the <math>n</math>-<math>p</math> set. Thus, when we add an element to the end to from a <math>n+1</math>-<math>r</math> set, <math>a_{n+1}</math> must be <math>\le p+1</math> if we want <math>r>p</math> because we need a way to express <math>p+1</math>. Since <math>p+1</math> is not expressible by the first <math>n</math> elements, <math>p+1+a_{n+1}</math> is not expressible by these <math>n+1</math> elements. Thus, the new set is a <math>n+1</math>-<math>r</math> set, where <math>r\leq p+1+a_{n+1} \leq 2^{n+1}-1</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <b>Lemma Proven</b> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | The answer to this question is <math>\max{(a_{10})}=248</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The following set is a <math>11</math>-<math>1500</math> set: | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>\{1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,247,248,750\}</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note that the first 8 numbers are power of <math>2</math> from <math>0</math> to <math>7</math>, and realize that any <math>8</math> or less digit binary number is basically sum of a combination of the first <math>8</math> elements in the set. Thus, <math>\exists Y\subseteq\{1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128\}</math>, <math>\sigma(Y)=x \forall 1\le x\leq 255</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>248\le\sigma(y)+a_9\le502</math> which implies that <math>\exists A\subseteq\{1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,247\}</math>, <math>\sigma(A)=x \forall 1\le x\leq 502</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Similarly <math>\exists B\subseteq\{1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,247,248\}</math>, <math>\sigma(A)=x \forall 1\le x\le750</math> and <math>\exists C\subseteq\{1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,247,248,750\}</math>, <math>\sigma(A)=x \forall 1\leq x\leq 1500</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br/>Thus, <math>\{1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,247,248,750\}</math> is a <math>11</math>-<math>1500</math> set. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Now, let's assume for contradiction that <math>\exists a_{10}\leq 247</math> such that <math>{a_1, a_2, \dots, a_{11}}</math> is a <math>11</math>-<math>q</math> set where <math>q\geq 1500</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>{a_1, a_2, \dots a_8}</math> is a <math>8</math>-<math>a</math> set where <math>a\leq 255</math> (lemma). | ||
+ | |||
+ | <math>max{(a_9)}=a_{10}-1\leq 246</math> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Let <math>{a_1, a_2, \dots, a_{10}}</math> be a <math>10</math>-<math>b</math> set where the first <math>8</math> elements are the same as the previous set. Then, <math>256+a_9+a_{10}</math> is not expressible as <math>\sigma(Y)</math>. Thus, <math>b\leq 255+a_9+a_{10}\leq 748</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In order to create a <math>11</math>-<math>d</math> set with <math>d>748</math> and the first <math>10</math> elements being the ones on the previous set, <math>a_{11}\leq 749</math> because we need to make <math>749</math> expressible as <math>\sigma(Y)</math>. Note that <math>b+1+a_{11}</math> is not expressible, thus <math>d<b+1+a_{11}\leq 1498</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <br/> | ||
+ | Done but not elegant... | ||
+ | |||
+ | == See Also == | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{USAMO box|year=1992|num-b=2|num-a=4}} | ||
+ | {{MAA Notice}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Olympiad Combinatorics Problems]] |
Latest revision as of 06:52, 19 July 2016
Problem
For a nonempty set of integers, let be the sum of the elements of . Suppose that is a set of positive integers with and that, for each positive integer , there is a subset of for which . What is the smallest possible value of ?
Solution
Let's a - set be a set such that , where , , , and for each , , , , .
(For Example is a - set and is a - set)
Furthermore, let call a - set a - good set if , and a - bad set if (note that for any - set. Thus, we can ignore the case where ).
Furthermore, if you add any amount of elements to the end of a - bad set to form another - set (with a different ), it will stay as a - bad set because for any positive integer and .
Lemma) If is a - set, .
For , or because and .
Assume that the lemma is true for some , then is not expressible with the - set. Thus, when we add an element to the end to from a - set, must be if we want because we need a way to express . Since is not expressible by the first elements, is not expressible by these elements. Thus, the new set is a - set, where
Lemma Proven
The answer to this question is .
The following set is a - set:
Note that the first 8 numbers are power of from to , and realize that any or less digit binary number is basically sum of a combination of the first elements in the set. Thus, , .
which implies that , .
Similarly , and , .
Thus, is a - set.
Now, let's assume for contradiction that such that is a - set where
is a - set where (lemma).
Let be a - set where the first elements are the same as the previous set. Then, is not expressible as . Thus, .
In order to create a - set with and the first elements being the ones on the previous set, because we need to make expressible as . Note that is not expressible, thus .
Done but not elegant...
See Also
1992 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 2 |
Followed by Problem 4 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.