Difference between revisions of "2016 USAMO Problems/Problem 1"
(→Solution) |
(→Solution 2) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
My proof that <math>|S|\ge 8</math> is basically the same as the one above. Here is another construction for <math>|S| = 8</math> that I like because it works with remainders and it's pretty intuitive. The basic idea is to assign different subsets to different remainders when divided by particular numbers, and then to use the Chinese Remainder Theorem to show that all of the subsets are distinct. The motivation for this comes from the fact that we want <math>X_i</math> and <math>X_{i+1}</math> to always be disjoint, so remainders are a great way to systematically make that happen, since <math>i</math> and <math>i+1</math> do not have the same remainder modulo any positive integer greater than <math>1.</math> Anyway, here is the construction: | My proof that <math>|S|\ge 8</math> is basically the same as the one above. Here is another construction for <math>|S| = 8</math> that I like because it works with remainders and it's pretty intuitive. The basic idea is to assign different subsets to different remainders when divided by particular numbers, and then to use the Chinese Remainder Theorem to show that all of the subsets are distinct. The motivation for this comes from the fact that we want <math>X_i</math> and <math>X_{i+1}</math> to always be disjoint, so remainders are a great way to systematically make that happen, since <math>i</math> and <math>i+1</math> do not have the same remainder modulo any positive integer greater than <math>1.</math> Anyway, here is the construction: | ||
− | Let <math>S = {1, 2, ..., 8}.</math> For <math>i = 1, 2, ..., 98,</math> we will choose which elements of the set <math>\left\{ {1, 2, 3, 4} \right\}</math> belong to <math>X_i</math> based on the remainder of <math>i</math> modulo <math>9,</math> and we will choose which elements of the set <math>\left\{ {5, 6, 7, 8} \right\}</math> belong to <math>X_i</math> based on the remainder of <math>i</math> modulo <math>11.</math> | + | Let <math>S = \left\{ {1, 2, ..., 8} \right\}.</math> For <math>i = 1, 2, ..., 98,</math> we will choose which elements of the set <math>\left\{ {1, 2, 3, 4} \right\}</math> belong to <math>X_i</math> based on the remainder of <math>i</math> modulo <math>9,</math> and we will choose which elements of the set <math>\left\{ {5, 6, 7, 8} \right\}</math> belong to <math>X_i</math> based on the remainder of <math>i</math> modulo <math>11.</math> We do this as follows: |
+ | <math>\begin{table} [ht] | ||
+ | \centering | ||
+ | \begin{tabular}{c c} | ||
+ | \hline | ||
+ | i (mod 9) & X_i \cap \left\{ {1, 2, 3, 4} \right\} \\ [0.5ex] | ||
+ | \hline | ||
+ | 1 & {1, 2} \\ [1ex] | ||
+ | \hline | ||
+ | \end{tabular} | ||
+ | \end{table}</math> | ||
Revision as of 21:29, 27 April 2016
Contents
Problem
Let be a sequence of mutually distinct nonempty subsets of a set . Any two sets and are disjoint and their union is not the whole set , that is, and , for all . Find the smallest possible number of elements in .
Solution 1
The answer is that .
First, we provide a inductive construction for . Actually, for we will provide a construction for which has elements in a line. (This is sufficient, since we then get for .) The idea is to start with the following construction for : Then inductively, we do the following procedure to move from to : take the chain for elements, delete an element, and make two copies of the chain (which now has even length). Glue the two copies together, joined by in between. Then place the element in alternating positions starting with the first (in particular, this hits ). For example, the first iteration of this construction gives: Now let's check is sufficient. Consider a chain on a set of size . (We need else .) Observe that there are sets of size can only be neighbored by sets of size , of which there are . So there are sets of size . Also, there are sets of size . So the total number of sets in a chain can be at most .
Solution 2
My proof that is basically the same as the one above. Here is another construction for that I like because it works with remainders and it's pretty intuitive. The basic idea is to assign different subsets to different remainders when divided by particular numbers, and then to use the Chinese Remainder Theorem to show that all of the subsets are distinct. The motivation for this comes from the fact that we want and to always be disjoint, so remainders are a great way to systematically make that happen, since and do not have the same remainder modulo any positive integer greater than Anyway, here is the construction:
Let For we will choose which elements of the set belong to based on the remainder of modulo and we will choose which elements of the set belong to based on the remainder of modulo We do this as follows: $\begin{table} [ht] \centering \begin{tabular}{c c} \hline i (mod 9) & X_i \cap \left\{ {1, 2, 3, 4} \right\} \\ [0.5ex] \hline 1 & {1, 2} \\ [1ex] \hline \end{tabular} \end{table}$ (Error compiling LaTeX. Unknown error_msg)
The problems on this page are copyrighted by the Mathematical Association of America's American Mathematics Competitions.
See also
2016 USAMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
First Problem | Followed by Problem 2 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAMO Problems and Solutions |
2016 USAJMO (Problems • Resources) | ||
Preceded by Problem 2 |
Followed by Problem 4 | |
1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 | ||
All USAJMO Problems and Solutions |